Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I think it's just dumb to point out the Southern Democrats because they did join the Republicans in response to civil rights and ending Jim Crow laws. Today people mock Democrats for that, but they seem to just be utterly oblivious or completely momentarily blanking out the fact that those racist Democrats went crawling to the Republican party.
I do not "know" he will be a disaster.
For stuff newer we have a really good idea, however. Without being able to sequence DNA, you're just guessing based on physiological comparisons and that can be REALLY problematic. 
That's true, but the quantities aren't close. I'm assuming you're referring to college students? College students always protest and speak out...been happening for centuries.
Evolution is fact. Look around, it's happening right now. There's more proof of evolution than gravity.
Climate change is influenced by the fossil fuel industry. Excessive CO2 in the atmosphere is creating a greenhouse effect warming the oceans and land. The fossil fuel industry are the culprits.
You mean he claimed he would do that but couldn't even drain the swamp. If the norm is capitalist cronies making more money off human health and oil then its business as usual.
It doesn't matter to what extent water vapor contributes to Earth's average temp.Solar flares and gamma ray bursts are possibly far more dangerous, and all we can do about those is tuck our heads between our legs and burn. Kinda depressing, now that I think about it.
The greenhouse gas that matters the most is actually water vapor, and nothing is going to change that. You can go as green as you want and nothing changes, but the air quality via reduction in pollution; even this has to be done carefully as electric vehicles are largely being charged by coal and make a swimming pool of toxic soup each. (In conventional cars you have the choice to drive them less, so basically the impact of them is actually LOWER if you are prudent.) Dump the pollution in the ground or the air and it's all still going to kill you.
Absolutely nothing you do will reduce the water vapor, so that's why it's a load of crap. CO2 only constitutes 0.04% of the atmosphere, so it is basically irrelevant.
So we are talking flooding in say extremely long time frames, but we'll all be dead and hopefully our future progeny have the sense to build on higher ground. Modern climate scientists are lying to keep their jobs and funding, and the proof is in things they do -- under-reporting glacial ice gains and movements, measuring temp changes that are inside their margins of error, and setting the goal-posts to pander to their biases. Even the most capable of scientists are able to do poor science, if no one challenges their assertions.
Ha, its ridiculous isn't it lol.
Mike Pence is very much that way. They are, in reality, a very major voting block.
They deny evolution, Mike Pence has heavily downplayed the risk of smoking even going as far to say it won't kill you. As for climate change and gender studies, those aren't pseudo sciences. And trying to "reform" psychosis into an identity doesn't even make sense - if someone suffers from a form of psychosis, they are psychotic. There isn't really much you can do to bypass that fact.
They could, but they don't. Their companies grow, stock prices rises, Wall Street is up, and money is flowing. But it's blowing upward. However, that is of little concern for neo-Libertarian free market Capitalists, who often see the big numbers of the big banks and big investors as the system working. From a Humanitarian perspective, one that advances the good of society rather than the wealth of a few, this is a very major concern. Historically, it does tend to lead to great civil unrest, revolt, and even rebellion. But when Capitalism is the goal, Economic numbers have improved substantially under Obama. The gains in Wall Street alone speak volumes to this. The immoral gains of corporate executives at the expense of the working class, however, which when it came to job losses, was only a problem until people started working again. Were we are at, it pretty much depends on if you think the wealthy who have succeeded in the system should reap the benefits due to claims of ownership, or do we elevate society as a whole? There is tons of research that strongly supports the idea that employees who are invested in and taken care of and are happy where are they work are far more loyal, dedicated, and much better workers and far more productive than those who feel like they are just a cog in a machine. Unfortunately, law is not based on fact and evidence.
Evolution is one of the most well understood theories in all of science. If you think DNA sequencing and physiological comparisons are the only evidence for evolution, you have not even scratched the tip of the ice berg of evidence that supports evolution. And what makes it so well understood, unlike something like gravity, is there is evidence all around us in support of it.Evolution science is pretty dicey, at least if you really know anything about it. It's very hard to sequence DNA off stuff that is older than 30,000 years old so much of what is claimed to be evolution is just a logical fallacy waiting to happen.
Yes, but, however, there are more Conservatives in America than Liberals. Fox News gets more ratings. The Vice President believes religion should be the basis of state legislation.
I'm calling it "butt hurt hippy syndrome." They're mad because they failed, and mocking people who were doing the same things they were. Except they had flowers and just too much loud, flashy, bright colors. At least they got to enjoy the good drugs.
Don't more people work for large corporations because there are more jobs than in small business?
But the economy definitely has an effect on those things.
How many times has this happened to the earth in history? Wiping out civilization like an asteroid?Solar flares and gamma ray bursts are possibly far more dangerous, and all we can do about those is tuck our heads between our legs and burn. Kinda depressing, now that I think about it.
So your logic is that CO2 isn't a problem because of it's low % in the atmosphere? Would you agree that water vapor increases in hotter/humid weather?
You miss the point. Most people who deny climate change miss the point, but that's because the point is never discussed. Everyone agrees that climate change is normal and happens in cycles. Do you know what the anomaly is?
It's far above my pay grade to confirm or dispute climate models.They're going to increase anyway, there is never a point in history where the sea was not raising sans the ice age. Antarctica and Greenland combined have enough ice melt to bring us 65 meters more water level, lol. Of course, that assumes a 100% melt-off (probably not likely). If you think that's bad, well it's rose about 30m since the last ice age, if I recall.
Anyway, I think we should control these things as pollutants. Unfortunately for most of the people here this is one of my nerd subjects, and I assure you about 90% of the global warming / climate change data is cooked. I don't take that tack lightly, in fact I find it frustrating.
To go further would just be diverting from the OP - it's probably another thread, so that's where I'll leave this.
I hope you're wrong, because I want to be dead before that happens.
Then I curse you with a long, healthy & prosperous life sipping margaritas in the shade of an Alaskan palm tree.
There's always a first time.
I'm just glad that people will replace bad Hitler references in online debate with bad Russian references.