Evidence -- making it useful

[Subduction Zone]

It goes against your claim, when you say, As long as a person is reasoning rationally evidence is the same for everyone.

The evidence for pre BB is pretty much non existent and controversial. In such circumstances, rational thinking carries no weight.

How so? How does that go against my claim? You may be trying to use a strawman argument. I said that there was evidence for the Big Bang. I said nothing about a before the Big Bang. A before the Big Bang may even be impossible. Time may have started with the Big Bang.

Meanwhile there still does not appear to be any evidence for a god belief.