Evidence of the Great Flood has been found; or not?

[james dixon]

It was not a reply directed to you.

my mistake; please forgive me -

 

[David1967]

If you are an atheist or not is not the issue here. I have provided visual evidence of a great flood that coo berates the biblical account. Coincident or not it does provide some truth to the biblical account; as I see it.

b.t.w. this did not come from a web site; next
-

I'm not an atheist, or denying biblical accounts, but I don't think that places like the grand canyon are evidence of the flood. (I'm not a young earth guy either) Best explanation is many many many years of erosion and weather and yes "floods" from time to time, in general. Note the different layers having different fossil remains representing different geological ages. For example; You don't find a T Rex fossil which is late Cretaceous, mixed in with Devonian or Cambrian Trilobites.

 

[DavidFirth]

If there were enough water on earth to flood it all, it would all be flooded now - no dry land anywhere.

And that's just the beginning of the problems with the biblical account of Noah. For one thing, if he had built an ark after warning neighbors that God had told him that He would drown the earth, once the waters started rising, his neighbors would have commandeered Noah's boat.

I'm sure that you're already familiar with the logistical problems of eight people collecting the earth's animals and sending them back home after the flood. Or housing them together. Or feeding them or cleaning their waste. Remember, eight people total.

And if you noticed, when Ken Ham built an ark, he required many millions of dollars, thousands of laborers, and technology like cranes unavailable to Noah.

Also, have you ever considered how hard it would need to rain to pour about 29,000 feet of water (the approximate height of the tallest peak) onto earth in 40 days (960 hours)? That's about 3 feet of water an hour. Two inches of rain an hour is a heavy rainfall.

Opinion noted.

 

[DavidFirth]

Rubbish.

Okay, no go back and refute every one of those links. Have fun.

 

[DavidFirth]

Yes, and pigs fly.

See above post.

 

[james dixon]

Yes, and pigs fly.

If believing this helps you sleep at knight; believe it.

may you have pleasant dreams in the nights ahead -

 

[Jayhawker Soule]

Okay, no go back and refute every one of those links. Have fun.

There is nothing fun about dealing with vile willful ignorance. I'd just as soon leave you to wallow in it.

 

[metis]

See above post.

Posted by someone with literally no evidence to offer.

 

[metis]

If believing this helps you sleep at knight; believe it.

may you have pleasant dreams in the nights ahead -

Most people have sheep jumping over the fence to help them get to sleep-- I dream of pigs, which is also why I frequent RF.

 

[ChristineM]

Yes, and pigs fly.

Damn, the price of bacon will go up

 

[metis]

Damn, the price of bacon will go up

Not if you take a plane.

 

[jonathan180iq]

Here is evidence of a Great Flood! Nothing else could have possibly caused these features other than a Global Deluge, such as was described in Genesis!!

*Please note that these images were supplied via a robotic lander from the surface of an alien world. (Mars)

 

[David1967]

Here is evidence of a Great Flood! Nothing else could have possibly caused these features other than a Global Deluge, such as was described in Genesis!!

*Please note that these images were supplied via a robotic lander from the surface of an alien world. (Mars)

Note the mermaid sitting on the rock in the bottom picture. Why would there be a mermaid if there wasn't water?

 

[ChristineM]

Not if you take a plane.

The price of bacon is even higher at 33000 feet

 

[jonathan180iq]

Note the mermaid sitting on the rock in the bottom picture. Why would there be a mermaid if there wasn't water?

No, you fool! It's an eroded sculpture of Sasquatch from the Ancient Civilization that NASA knows about but won't share with the public because it would be too dangerous! Luckily my friend Brian is a hacker and pulled these raw images directly from the deep web, to help unleash our minds.

 

[sun rise]

Only to the gullible who believe everything written in websites that confirm their faith.

So you don't believe in the scientific evidence because why?

 

[DavidFirth]

There is nothing fun about dealing with vile willful ignorance. I'd just as soon leave you to wallow in it.

Can't refute it. Yeah, I know.

 

[DavidFirth]

Posted by someone with literally no evidence to offer.

Check all the links. Plenty to offer.

 

[Mister Silver]

Check all the links. Plenty to offer.

So if I provide you with plenty of links to anything, anything at all, you'll believe what those links provide?

 

[Polymath257]

Yesterday I came across some pictures of the great flood and want to share them with you

View attachment 19165


View attachment 19166



View attachment 19167
Nothing of this kink could have created such erosion in such a great area except for a great flood.

at least in my view.
What do you see?

You need to learn the difference between wind generated erosional patterns and water generated erosional patterns. Your first two pictures are *clearly* wind-generated and NOT water generated.

The third is water generated (see the river at the bottom?) but NOT flood generated: those turns are not produced by flooding, but by cutting into the rock by a river over long periods of time. Floods produce a more straight-line type of erosion (sometimes branched).

So, no, NONE of these are remotely like what would be produced by a flood.