Evidence of the Great Flood has been found; or not?

[Polymath257]

Here's more evidence. Can you provide some too?
View attachment 19168

Another example that could NOT be produced by a flood, but is clearly produced by a river carving into the rock.

 

[DavidFirth]

You need to learn the difference between wind generated erosional patterns and water generated erosional patterns. Your first two pictures are *clearly* wind-generated and NOT water generated.

The third is water generated (see the river at the bottom?) but NOT flood generated: those turns are not produced by flooding, but by cutting into the rock by a river over long periods of time. Floods produce a more straight-line type of erosion (sometimes branched).

So, no, NONE of these are remotely like what would be produced by a flood.

Another example that could NOT be produced by a flood, but is clearly produced by a river carving into the rock.

Opinions noted.

 

[Polymath257]

Because this massive erosion could not have come from wind; but water; in my view -

Actually, some of the ones you posted *clearly* did come from wind erosion as opposed to water erosion. Water tends to be thicker than air and so it produces different types of erosional patterns.

 

[Polymath257]

Opinions noted.

Not an opinion at all: verifiable facts concerning how water and wind erode rocks.

 

[DavidFirth]

Not an opinion at all: verifiable facts concerning how water and wind erode rocks.

Opinion noted.

 

[Mister Silver]

Not an opinion at all: verifiable facts concerning how water and wind erode rocks.

There's no getting through to some religious people.

 

[DavidFirth]

There's no getting through to some religious people.

Opinion noted.

 

[Polymath257]

Opinion noted.

It seems you have a tough time distinguishing between opinions and verifiable facts.

 

[Mister Silver]

It seems you have a tough time distinguishing between opinions and verifiable facts.

You know how he's going to respond. After a while, why bother?

 

[DavidFirth]

It seems you have a tough time distinguishing between opinions and verifiable facts.

It seems you don't understand that verifiable theories aren't verified by assumed truths.

Opinion noted.

 

[Ubon]

Even if you do manage to proove there was a great flood, it still does not prove a God created it.

 

[DavidFirth]

Even if you do manage to proove there was a great flood, it still does not prove a God created it.

That's okay because you can't prove He didnt, either.

 

[SalixIncendium]

Okay, no go back and refute every one of those links. Have fun.

Also, Bigfoot is real.

Bigfoot is real - Google Search

Disagree? Then go back and refute those links. Have fun.

See, I can do a Google search for something that doesn't exist and get a bunch of hits, too.

 

[DavidFirth]

Also, Bigfoot is real.

Bigfoot is real - Google Search

Disagree? Then go back and refute those links. Have fun.

See, I can do a Google search for something that doesn't exist and get a bunch of hits, too.

But I never said Bigfoot isn't real. Some here say there was no global flood. Good try, though.

 

[SalixIncendium]

But I never said Bigfoot isn't real. Some here say there was no global flood. Good try, though.

Opinion noted.

 

[SalixIncendium]

But I never said Bigfoot isn't real. Some here say there was no global flood. Good try, though.

But just so I'm clear, you do believe Bigfoot is real, correct?

 

[DavidFirth]

But just so I'm clear, you do believe Bigfoot is real, correct?

No, I'm not sure and don't care, really.

 

[SalixIncendium]

No, I'm not sure and don't care, really.

You gave two answers here. Is it "no?" Or is it "I'm not sure?"

 

[DavidFirth]

You gave two answers here. Is it "no?" Or is it "I'm not sure?"

Dont know; don't care.

 

[herushura]

All Christians, Jews and Muslims believe the Earth to be 6000 years old and that a Great flood happened.

Abrahamic people that mock the OP are hypocrites.