Bunyip
pro scapegoat
Do you mean like a white and a negro ?
No. Causasians and Negros are the same species.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Do you mean like a white and a negro ?
Erm.....buddy, of course death and decay is 'substantiated' - what a strange thing to deny. We can and have observed the death and decay of organisms. How could you possibly imagine that b to be unsubstantiated?One is not trying to make contact with a stone,
One is trying to make contact with another brain just as we
are all conscious/aware persons, carrying out our own desires and
acting them out through physical bodies with results that impact others.
In the same way other conscious/aware persons carry out their own desires
through physical bodies with results that impact on us.
Because an accepted scientific theory is not known or in affect or seen physically, it does not mean that a correlation between consciousness and our physical material world does not indeed exist in some way, shape or form. It's impossible to have laws of quantum science without consciousness, and most importantly because anyone doing anything has to be conscious in the first place.
Hypothetically, if it's the physical brain that makes the human aware and alive... Then it's creator, albeit the universe, nature, God ...must be a larger physical brain that is aware and alive.
The similarities to the human brain and the cosmos are abundant. If there is no connection between the brain and the universe, that would be one thing, but if they are the same then there is no reason we cannot make contact. Already experienced.
One is either curious for knowledge or genuinely cares for the future of man/mindkind. Either way, the only thing can change mankind would happen internally and spiritually, not physically. Religion makes this mistake, as well as much of science, and most of the world, material and physical. Same delusion of culprits. The physical.
We don't sustain the universe's life. The universe sustains ours.
Either way, whether it's higher intelligence, universe, nature... We conform to its rules, and our freewill is very limited.
We are creators ourselves carrying out creation through our consciousness, intelligence, brains, and minds. We collectively create, through the bodies we were given, and not chosen ourselves.
The body one resides in isn't their own, the knowledge and ability of one isn't their own doing, and being conscious wasn't ones own doing.
Such is true: yar what yar and not by choice or ones own selection.
"You die, you rot... End of story".... Most unsubstantiated claim of all. You've never experienced death, or rotting or an end of story.
Sure, consciousness repeats. That which was, is, and is to come. Life.
No, not at all. Intelligent design was a fraud invented by the Discovery Institute to try to disguise young earth creationism as science.Thanks for the reply, friend.
Here's how I know it:
Human beings are not descended from a lower form of animal.
As far as human bodies are concerned...
That's another story.
Human bodies are animal.
Human bodies are animal and have many characteristics in common with the lower forms via genetics etc.
Evolution applies to human bodies.
GOD
The Human BEING was created by God to enter in the body when it has evolved to the proper status.
This is where so many err.
There is a BIG difference between a human BEING and a human BODY.
The same difference as a car and it's driver.
A human body evolves and a human being is created by God.
In other words:
Evolution IS intelligent design.
Erm.....buddy, of course death and decay is 'substantiated' - what a strange thing to deny. We can and have observed the death and decay of organisms. How could you possibly imagine that b to be unsubstantiated?
Then why did you deny it? What other sort of 'matter' do you imagine is relevant by the way?Of course, the physical matter does.
No, not at all. Intelligent design was a fraud invented by the Discovery Institute to try to disguise young earth creationism as science.
How can it not matter that ID is a fraud?Essentially, it doesn't matter. As long as mindkind has a mind, much out there is fraud. It's all about love and peace and truth. Anything else is ego driven, power, control, agenda, bias, whose knowledge is bigger... None of that matters.
Then why did you deny it? What other sort of 'matter' do you imagine is relevant by the way?
How can it not matter that ID is a fraud?
What has that got to do with the topic?I know the transformation, higher conscious and awareness "God" has brought to me, and how what "God" can do for anyone who denies themselves. The world is a mess. It's a fraud just because someone else hasn't experienced anything within themselves, when the real fraud is everything physical and material, as well as religion and dogma.
What has that got to do with the topic?
What has the fact the we die and rot got to do with purpose?It matters significantly. The physical animal realm is not a place one should want to evolve in over and over, or as a place our children grow in. Why and what purpose would that matter to one who just dies and rots, and wastes the opportunity as a human?
We just got out of the food chain ten thousand years ago. Going back into it is the biggest mistake possible, and is exactly where most of mankind is heading. . Back to water. Scripture calls this hell. Darkness, abyss, worms, sulfur, water (the lake), an unquenchable fire, a deep pit, cold, etc.What has the fact the we die and rot got to do with purpose?
No. Causasians and Negros are the same species.
The first thing that you have to recognize is that there is an animal that have both gills and lungs. The Australian lungfish can respire through its gills. In other lungfish species, the gills are too atrophied to allow for adequate gas exchange. When a lungfish is obtaining oxygen from its gills, its circulatory system is configured similarly to the common fish.
One of the advantage of becoming terrestrial is access to the much oxygen richer atmosphere, water carries much less oxygen and thus can not support higher oxygen demands. For example: The reason whales and dolphins don't have gills is that a litre of air at sea level contains 210 millilitres of oxygen; a litre of seawater at 25 °C contains at most 5ml. What this means is that you need to pass roughly 40 times as much water through gills than air through lungs, in volume terms, to get the same amount of oxygen. In energy terms, things look even worse: for every gram of oxygen, air breathers have to move 3.5 grams of air, whereas those relying on gills have to move 100,000 grams of a much more viscus fluid. So, an animal that uses lungs will require a higher level of oxygenation than gills are capable of.
With thanks to: Short Sharp Science: Why whales don't have gills
They didn't.What ?
Why, did the fruit flies evolved to birds ?
They didn't.
Just as you are still a primate, so what?So still it's fly.
Just as you are still a primate, so what?