Evolution: Do you see the resemblence

[Autodidact]

Innocent animals live in caves and brush, but Humans always build cities.

No they don't. Is anthropology just one of the subject you know nothing about? There are many people all over the world who don't live in cities. Have you heard of New Guinea? The people there never lived in cities until maybe 100 years ago.

 

[astarath]

But some now also speculate that there is amazing similarities between humanity and pigs. Does this make us a half breed of pig ape? I call us "pigape"! Spanish origin meaning ridiculous theory!

 

[Autodidact]

After 4 Million + years, Evolution Never produced anyone who built a city. Noah's grandsons produced Offspring who built the 1st Human Cities on this Planet after the universal flood. That's what happens when you combine the physical DNA of the sons of God (prehistoric beings), with the Human Intelligence of Adam's descendants. We get today's Human Beings, and you don't have to wait for Millions of years to become Civilized. Evolutionism is the odd man out.

:yes:

How old are you? Do you have a high school diploma?

 

[Autodidact]

I present You as factual evidence that God made everything that moves, including Humans. All Humans descended from Adam, the first Human. Science has NO idea How or When we inherited our Human Intelligence, but Moses knew, and told of it more than 3,000 years ago.

This evidence, which agrees with every true discovery of Science, History, is True to Scripture, and shows that Evolutionist believers would Not be here, to post their ideas, if Noah had not brought Human Intelligence to this "Planet of Apes" some 10K years ago. The fact that they can organize a thought, and type it into their computer, separates them from all other animals, and identifies them as "Human".

Mindless Evolution nor Uncaring Nature produced Human Intelligence. That's a lie and that's Evolutionism, the Evol Religion. No Un-Intelligent entity, nor Flawed Theory, ever produced anything. Jesus made it or it's Not here.

:yes:

I'm sorry, I missed the evidence you promised. What is the evidence? Do you know what the word "evidence" means?

 

[Autodidact]

Mankind (prehistoric beings) changed from prehistoric to Human just AFTER Noah arrived on this "Planet Apes" (described by some scientists). Civilization was born just South of the Mountains of Ararat, exactly as God told us.

This event took place some 10,000 + - years ago, and History agrees with Scripture. Evolutionism is odd man out, and NO Evol has been able to show us ANY evidence of an Earlier Human Civilization, than that which is listed in Scripture.
:yes:

That may be because evolution is a theory in Biology. You are now discussing anthropology, which is a different field altogether.

 

[astarath]

uhoh throwing out the ology's

 

[Autodidact]

But some now also speculate that there is amazing similarities between humanity and pigs. Does this make us a half breed of pig ape? I call us "pigape"! Spanish origin meaning ridiculous theory!

Could you please clue the rest of us in as to what you are talking about? We're talking about evolution.

 

[astarath]

I am just talking your typical theist who really doesnt care about another evolution thread jargon please feel free to ignore and continue in the name of Pigape supporters everywhere!

 

[Autodidact]

I am just talking your typical theist who really doesnt care about another evolution thread jargon please feel free to ignore and continue in the name of Pigape supporters everywhere!

What are you trying to say? Maybe some punctuation would help?

 

[astarath]

Punctuation...I dont need no stinkin punctuation!!!LOL

 

[Autodidact]

O.K., now to get back to the theory of evolution. I hope that everyone here who wants to criticize it has read my basic explanation of the theory and understands it. If you think I have not explained it correctly, please say so, and why. Otherwise, that established, at last we move on.

More intro:

First, you have to understand that evolution is not a philosophy or world view, it's a very specific scientific theory about a very specific thing. A "theory" in science is a complete explanation of something in nature, incorporating and explaining all known facts. For example, there is a theory of gravity, the atomic theory of matter, and the like.

Science is not about proof, and we are not going to prove anything. Science is all about evidence. All of what we consider scientific knowledge is based on evidence, not proof.

For that reason, all scientific knowledge is provisional. Nothing is ever known for absolute certainty, not even that the earth is round. It's all on a sliding scale, from wild speculation to virtual certainty. When something reaches that virtual certainty, and explains an important phenomenon completely, it's an accepted scientific theory. That's where we are with evolution now. Nevertheless, we are constantly gathering new data, advancing and refining that theory. That's how science works: it builds on well-established theories and goes forward to more accurate and precise explanations. At the fringe there are always questions that are not yet resolved, and controversies.

 

[Autodidact]

Punctuation...I dont need no stinkin punctuation!!!LOL

Well that may depend on whether you want us to understand you or not.

 

[astarath]

As I clearly stated before In yet another evolution thread punction is not really going to bridge the gap of understanding regardless of how effectively it may be placed :"',.?!

 

[Autodidact]

As I clearly stated before In yet another evolution thread punction is not really going to bridge the gap of understanding regardless of how effectively it may be placed :"',.?!

O.K., well if you can't make yourself understood, you may want to stop posting.

 

[astarath]

Or I may wish to continue until the point I just made is grasped within the thread!

 

[Autodidact]

Or I may wish to continue until the point I just made is grasped within the thread!

Well, as I said, punctuation helps. What was your point about pigs?

 

[Papersock]

Or I may wish to continue until the point I just made is grasped within the thread!

Is your point that it is pointless to try to explain anything so why bother?

 

[Azakel]

I am just talking your typical theist who really doesnt care about another evolution thread jargon please feel free to ignore and continue in the name of Pigape supporters everywhere!

Then why come in here and read it. You're doing nothing but Trolling right now.

 

[Aasimar]

I'm no mod, but I think it's fair to declare the troll to be fully fed and this thread to be completely dead at this point, it's just another lawlmonkeysaren'tpeopleandIrefusetolearnanythingaboutevolutionbutIwillattackitwheneverIcan thread.

 

[Autodidact]

I hereby resurrect this thread, so I'm not a liar.

O.K., the evidence. The first piece. You will remember that according to ToE, new species branch out from existing species. You have one species, and another one branches out from it just like the branch of a tree. Now eventually the first one is going to go extinct, but nevertheless if you had total knowledge, and all the species that have every lived (hundreds of millions of them) they would all be related to each other just like a tree, with a single trunk, a few large limbs, each limb having branches growing out of it, and so on, down to the newest tiny little twig at the end. Therefore, ToE says, all of the organisms on earth should show just this pattern of relationship, and no other. You should see a branching pattern of similarity, and this should be the only logical and objective way to organize them and understand their relationships.

And in fact this turns out to be true. Every organism ever discovered, current or extinct, is related to all the others, and can objectively, by multiple traits, be arranged into this "tree of life." This isn't really a prediction of ToE, because Linneaus (a creationist) observed that this was the best way to organize living things before ToE was figured out. However, the grand ToE, the one that says that this is how all species originated, does predict that this will be the case for each and every organism, period. So in that sense it contains millions of predictions that have been borne out.

Before Linneus, the common view was that life was organized in one big chain or ladder, with the "highest" at the top (people) and the "lowest" at the bottom (slime molds?). This turned out to be wrong, as Linneus and ToE discovered. You might also arrange things in a chart form, or just willy nilly, with no particular pattern of relationships. According to ToE, the only objective, coherent way life could possibly be organized is in this tree shape, which Biologists call a "nested hierarchy."
And we see that in fact this is reality on the ground. And in the air. And in the sea.

There is a lot more to say about this important fact, which IMO in itself is powerful evidence for ToE, once you understand its implication, so please post if you want to discuss or argue.