firedragon
Veteran Member
It does not prove anything. Read it. Every tom, dick, and harry knows about the experiment but it does not provide a theory.
Go ahead and read it. Cheers.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Evolution, maybe someone can explain?
- Thread starter YoursTrue
- Start date
Go ahead and read it. Cheers.
I assumes things not in evidence. Nothing in that article implied or claimed that doctors were disregarding the research. There was nothing stating or claiming that patients cast their fortunes to the wind and went in blind or recommended they do so. There is nothing being ignored that says the theory of evolution is refuted or that what is found is being ignored.
You have no correlation.
Me too.
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
Ok ty
You may believe it, but you haven't demonstrated it.
You're position is that the science is flawed, but your evidence is unsupported claims that people are ignoring it and saying whatever they want based on what you claim is a profit motivation. Even if true, that doesn't demonstrate the science to be flawed. Only people and we know they can be. But just because they can doesn't mean they did or support your claims.
This is just circles on circles with you rejecting the evidence and claiming you are right for your own personal motivations. Just like you are claiming doctors are doing.
If you cannot see this or don't want to, there is nothing more to say about it.
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
I believe I do I have explained it.
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
Very good for you too. All six?
I haven't read all of them either. I've read parts of the other editions.
It is 150 years out of date, but still worth reading. Rather long, trying recitations of evidence, but still worth it.
Have you read any of them?
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
No. I hope to. I guess the best one to read would be the last one he wrote.
It took me a while to get through it but was worth the read.
Then there is nothing more to discuss. I can't make you learn or recognize the flaws you are following if you willfully want to ignore them.
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
Did you read the entire book or just parts of one of the editions?
I have the popup edition. It's wonderful.
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
I do not believe I am ignoring what I reviewed with regard to the scientific evidence about stents. Best we leave it at that.
Watch out for the giraffe section! I nearly lost an eye.
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
You have that wrong that you say I believe the science is flawed. My goodness, can't you come up with some accusation better than that? Frankly, it is truly possible that our discussion IS over with all these false accusations you put forth. Maybe later...
I have seen you ignore what I posted, ignore parts of the articles and seemingly add things that are not in the articles.
If no amount of evidence or reason will convince you, then what is the purpose of discussing this any further?
I am exactly correct based on the evidence. It has been noted by others as well. It is the point that you are attempting to make by the misinterpretation of the articles.
Again, we are back to the game of "prolong this without concession". Ignore the evidence. Ignore what others tell you.
I think this is enough.