Evolution, maybe someone can explain?

[YoursTrue]

If there is selective pressure + time +good luck, why, wouldn’t humans evolve in to a swimming creature with lungs and scales (something that would be called a “fish”)?

Because they say so that's why.

 

[YoursTrue]

As far as I can see, it is not controversial and nobody in tis forum disagrees

I don't even know what y'all are concluding from, therefore I'm not casting my ballot yet.

 

[YoursTrue]

If they (some) already belive that the universe came from nothing………. Humans evolving in to fish most look like a walk in the park for them

And I'm also saying that what mutations make can make humans to fish according to the theory

 

[Pogo]

Pathetic. I have to repeat everything a million times (when I use the word "metaphysics" I mean basis of science) and you just say you've already said it.

That's no argument it's an evasion. And modern theory is still based on experiment not claims of already having proved something.

And again, your private definition, that is what metaphysics means to English speakers. You are not doing any better with theory either.

 

[Pogo]

Then SQ is not predictive but rather counts offspring.

Remarkable! You don't see a problem with lack of experiment, lack of predictive capabilities, or an understanding that doesn't explain!

Mass isn't predictive either, your point?

 

[Pogo]

An interesting set of behavior are abortion and trans gender. If we do the math, these behavior go the opposite of evolution and natural selection, since this part of the population is taking breeding and offspring off the table. Evolution is usually a positive thing based on fitness plus procreation so the fitness genes can go forward. But these behavior, by bottlenecking breeding, are detached from evolution. Even if fit in culture, lack of breeding, does not pass their genes forward for evolution.

Does nature also cause some to leave the gene pool, so the direction of evolution can detoured? We have whales beaching themselves, essentially taking themselves out of the breeding cycle of natural selection. Does this mean, since the DNC, which is big on abortion and transgender, by departing procreation, are going the opposite way of natural selection; natural de-selection? Does this mean the DNC, itself, is heading toward extinction, by deselecting from natural selection?

Trump and the RNC, conceptually go along with evolution; fitness and breeding. Therefore is the RNC the new natural future of natural selection? Could we make a prediction? A vote for Trump, is a vote of natural selection, breeding and evolution. Ironically, most religions, tell the faithful to have babies and therefore are religions like an arm of modern evolution? Those who de-select, good luck. Do the math based on the parameters of the existing theory. I am an applied scientist doing the math.

Then explain with math etc why some species miscarry when food supplies are limited?

You might have been an engineer once, but scientist, no.

 

[Pogo]

If there is selective pressure + time +good luck, why, wouldn’t humans evolve in to a swimming creature with lungs and scales (something that would be called a “fish”)?

Do you consider whales to be fish?