Evolution My ToE

[Subduction Zone]

He told us centuries before how He would come, to a virgin. That means your sneaky hanky panky accusations are vile.

No, you misunderstand that part of the Bible. And there was no claim even there that it would be a virgin. So you lose doubly on that one.

 

[dad]

These arguments beg the question and are ad hoc attempts to explain the evidence.

False. You just want to declare any other belief than your own ad hoc!

There is no evidence for a world-wide flood;

Plenty. The worldwide legends and accounts of one. God's word about what happened, confirmed by Jesus. The fact that there is no evidence against it. Possibly the KT layer iridium which science says is sourced from the same places floodwaters came from-space and deep under the earth Etc.

the Genesis flood was probably a local flood (one of many in recorded history) in the valleys of the Tigris and Euphrates).

No. It clearly killed all animals and men on earth.

If you think that 'man and MOST animals on earth, and most plants also, ... could not leave ... fossil remains', you should present some evidence.

If you claim they could you need to prove nature was the same then! Otherwise, we all just believe wat we like.

The story of the 'confusion of tongues' at the time of the Tower of Babel is pseudo-history;

It is stamped with the approval of God. It fits the evidence such as where cultures religions and customs and languages came from.

there were separate languages long before the foundation of Babylon,

Prove it. Your dates will crumble like soda crackers.

and the idea that the Earth's continents were first divided in historical time is geologically and physically impossible.

Completely possible in the former nature. You seek to limit the past to the present nature, that is religion and not fact or science.


Man was on Pangaea!! Noah's ark landed on Pangaea. The tower of Babel was built in Pangaea. That is why animals and people could get around as we see has happened! The evidence fits.

 

[dad]

What was wrong with that? You were the one that called Mary a "ho". No one else made that claim.

No. I say there was a virgin birth. Try being honest.

 

[dad]

And there was no claim even there that it would be a virgin. .

Yes, there was. That was confirmed in the New Testament. I win.

 

[Subduction Zone]

False. You just want to declare any other belief than your own ad hoc!
Plenty. The worldwide legends and accounts of one. God's word about what happened, confirmed by Jesus. The fact that there is no evidence against it. Possibly the KT layer iridium which science says is sourced from the same places floodwaters came from-space and deep under the earth Etc.



No. It clearly killed all animals and men on earth.

If you claim they could you need to prove nature was the same then! Otherwise, we all just believe wat we like.

It is stamped with the approval of God. It fits the evidence such as where cultures religions and customs and languages came from.

Prove it. Your dates will crumble like soda crackers.
Completely possible in the former nature. You seek to limit the past to the present nature, that is religion and not fact or science.


Man was on Pangaea!! Noah's ark landed on Pangaea. The tower of Babel was built in Pangaea. That is why animals and people could get around as we see has happened! The evidence fits.

All of the evidence tells us that you are wrong.

Are you ready to learn what is and what is not evidence yet?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Yes, there was. That was confirmed in the New Testament. I win.

Nope, you lose. The authors of the New Testament have been shown not to be too honest in some matters. If you understood the Bible you would see this. Would you care to discuss the prophecy that you do not understand?

 

[Subduction Zone]

No. I say there was a virgin birth. Try being honest.

But you were also the only one that referred to Mary as a "ho". I can quote and link the post.

 

[Bear Wild]

No. It clearly killed all animals and men on earth

And dinosaurs too?
Why were dinosaurs not allowed on the ark. There were supposed to two of every kind.
Did the flood kill all of the plants too? Looking for your guidance on these serious issues.

 

[Bear Wild]

Man was on Pangaea!! Noah's ark landed on Pangaea. The tower of Babel was built in Pangaea. That is why animals and people could get around as we see has happened! The evidence fits.

This statement is so bizarre. Did you think this one up while smoking the hookah with the caterpillar? The fictional tower of babel build on Pangea really. Noah landed his ark on Pangea 200 million years ago? And you really believe this?

 

[Bear Wild]

But you were also the only one that referred to Mary as a "ho". I can quote and link the post.

I wonder what the genetics are like in a virgin birth. We see jesus pictured a male but Mary would have only carried the x chromosome and without a male to give the y chromosome we have a very strange jesus. That is unless god is male and mated with her giving here his y chromosome. But we need not worry because "dad" will come up with equally outrageous answer to that.

 

[YoursTrue]

If by respect you mean, believing whatever you say as the absolute truth of the universe straight from the mouth of God, without questioning it, then sorry, I'm a blasphemer and will continue to be one.

I didn't think that he meant we should believe what every religion says or teaches, but that we should a respectful conversation, even if we disagree.

 

[dad]

All of the evidence tells us that you are wrong.

All evidence agrees with me. Nor do I have your need to deny Scripture, and history and the spiritual.

 

[YoursTrue]

I wonder what the genetics are like in a virgin birth. We see jesus pictured a male but Mary would have only carried the x chromosome and without a male to give the y chromosome we have a very strange jesus. That is unless god is male and mated with her giving here his y chromosome. But we need not worry because "dad" will come up with equally outrageous answer to that.

That is interesting, because I'd like to ask when the first appearance of male and female (animals) came about, if you know.

 

[dad]

The authors of the New Testament have been shown not to be too honest in some matters.

Add that to your Satanic accusation list I guess.

 

[dad]

But you were also the only one that referred to Mary as a "ho". I can quote and link the post.

That is a nice term for what you accused her of.

 

[dad]

And dinosaurs too?
Why were dinosaurs not allowed on the ark. There were supposed to two of every kind.
Did the flood kill all of the plants too? Looking for your guidance on these serious issues.

If dinos were not already mostly extict, which I suspect may have been the case, they would not have been called to the ark unless they were original created kinds. There is much scientific speculation that some dinos and birds are related. So, if that were true we would have had birds that adapted/evolved to dinos. (since birds were here since creation week for sure). That would make dinos very evolved from the created kind. So they would not have been one of the kinds of animals invited.

 

[Subduction Zone]

All evidence agrees with me. Nor do I have your need to deny Scripture, and history and the spiritual.

No dad. You do not even understand the concept.

Why are you afraid to learn what is and what is not evidence?

 

[Subduction Zone]

That is a nice term for what you accused her of.

No, it is a term that uneducated and rude bigots use. I only said that she was human. You want to make that some sort of deadly sin.

 

[dad]

This statement is so bizarre. Did you think this one up while smoking the hookah with the caterpillar? The fictional tower of babel build on Pangea really.

Of course!

Noah landed his ark on Pangea 200 million years ago?

Doesn't matter when your dream dates have something happeneing. They are based on ratios of isotopes for the most part. Ratios that got there by either creation or/and the subsequent processes of the former different nature! Not by anything happening in this present nature. (as science has assumed and believed for no real reason at all).[/QUOTE] I can't see any way around it. Science does know that the continents were together one time in the past. If you believed in the bible would you not also deduce the same thing?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Add that to your Satanic accusation list I guess.

How are facts "Satanic"?