lol, ok. Meantime, I'm going to ask about Spinoza. Maybe you have an opinion, maybe you don't. I'll put it on another thread.
I won't answer. Mainly because I find you insincere.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
lol, ok. Meantime, I'm going to ask about Spinoza. Maybe you have an opinion, maybe you don't. I'll put it on another thread.
that's ok, you have your opinion, but that's ok. (you're excused...)I won't answer. Mainly because I find you insincere.
Do you actually think you know when the accounts in the Bible were written?
In other words, you don't want to or can't give me an answer. I suspect you can't.is that mere ignorance, or sheer wilful refusal to recognise that the Biblical books - like the Genesis and Exodus aren’t as old as you believed to be?
Ignorance can be rectified by education. The later is just you deceiving yourself because of your biases…here, you cannot be helped.
That's ok. I'm used to no answers one way or another.I won't answer. Mainly because I find you insincere.
Not putting him down but he also made money that way. And yes he figured what he figured even though it was clearly mental gymnastics. Maybe this, maybe that.etc. fini say what you want, I see that.
In other words, you don't want to or can't give me an answer. I suspect you can't.
No coherent answers is your "modus operandi."That's ok. I'm used to no answers one way or another.
Based on the size of their wings and their weight, bees are not supposed to fly as easily as they do. According to physical laws, this is impossible, because they weigh too much compared to the size and fragility of their wings. How did a supposedly blind evolution produce such a feat if according to known laws that result cannot be possible?
Based on the size of their wings and their weight, bees are not supposed to fly as easily as they do. According to physical laws, this is impossible
Have you ever seen the many different varieties of pheasant that exist and their different colors? What blind evolution produces that result?
Have you ever seen the many different varieties of pheasant that exist and their different colors? What blind evolution produces that result?
That was said by an early German aeronautical engineer that did not understand how bees, especially bumblebees flew.Based on the size of their wings and their weight, bees are not supposed to fly as easily as they do. According to physical laws, this is impossible, because they weigh too much compared to the size and fragility of their wings. How did a supposedly blind evolution produce such a feat if according to known laws that result cannot be possible?
Evolution is not "blind". For some reason creationists cannot ever remember that all of the "forces" of evolution are working at the same time. You forgot natural selection which is not "blind". Pretty soon we will hear that "Oh, natural selection cannot add new informationHave you ever seen the many different varieties of pheasant that exist and their different colors? What blind evolution produces that result?
Wrong. A bee's wings not only flap, but they also rotate a bit to increase lift and to allow the bee to fly backwards.Based on the size of their wings and their weight, bees are not supposed to fly as easily as they do. According to physical laws, this is impossible, because they weigh too much compared to the size and fragility of their wings. How did a supposedly blind evolution produce such a feat if according to known laws that result cannot be possible?