I agree that people performing cannibalism doesn't make them not people. I just don't agree that not eating people makes them not animals. People are still animals, just with a high opinion of themselves lol.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Evolution, violence and the existence of God
- Thread starter Nirvana
- Start date
Bob the Unbeliever
Well-Known Member
But. You CAN cross wolves with german shepherds, and get non-sterile pups. So much for "kind"--- it's a BS term, devoid of useful meaning.
siti
Well-Known Member
Something like this:
arjuna
Member
evolution is towards non-ego and non-violence.
Fossils- List of human evolution fossils - WikipediaSomething like this:or this:but probably with a brain size larger than the first and smaller than the second.
I dont know how it looked like, we dont have the fossils yet but we`re sure of it because of DNA evidence. FOr more information, read Finding Darwin`s God by Ken Miller or watch this-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_c3CkSmT3c
and this-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ohd5uqzlwsU
Read Douglas Theobald`s peer reviewed article on Nature. You can find other amazing books too and peer reviewed articles. Read the chapter on fossils in Dawkins` the greatest show on earth.
We have lots of fossils, the most recent being tiktaalik which is the perfect representative of the evolutionary transition fromfish to amphibians. This animal is really half-fish half-amphibian. We have other fossils which shows human evolution like homo erectus,Australopithecus etc. Just look, the evidence is there to see
Sorry, it was intended for that other guy oops.Something like this:or this:but probably with a brain size larger than the first and smaller than the second.
Guy Threepwood
Mighty Pirate
Bob the Unbeliever
Well-Known Member
Proof of evolution:
1) 15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense
2) Lines of evidence: The science of evolution
3) http://io9.gizmodo.com/8-scientific-discoveries-that-prove-evolution-is-real-1729902558
4) Human Evolution Evidence | The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program
5) How Did Multicellular Life Evolve? - Astrobiology Magazine
6) TalkOrigins Archive: Exploring the Creation/Evolution Controversy
7) Evolution
8) http://ideonexus.com/2012/02/12/101-reasons-why-evolution-is-true/
9) http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence
10) http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/…/topicbrowse2.php…
11) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent
12) http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/03/0308_060308_evolution.html
13) http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/home.php
14) http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evo_01
Guy Threepwood
Mighty Pirate
Sorry, it was intended for that other guy oops.
something like... ?
which do you think it closer?
Last edited:
Bob the Unbeliever
Well-Known Member
something like... ?
which do you think it closer?
Chick is a well known abuser of children, a world-class liar, and a bigot too. No thanks.
Guy Threepwood
Mighty Pirate
Never heard of him, but he didn't invent Piltdown man, which do you think looks more like the common ancestor, why no fossil/evidence yet?
Last edited:
That is because they have Not gone past their ' kind '. Same family type.
Can't mate a wolf with a cat, can't mate a german shepherd with a cat because they are of different ' kinds '.
There are hybrid flowers but they also reach the limit of their ' kind '.
If evolution is towards non-ego and non-violence, and was graded today would evolution get an "A" or ?
Rather I see the selfish distorted form of love being displayed in today's world as described at 2 Timothy 3:1-5,13.
That is in sharp contrast to the definition of love as defined at 1 Corinthians 13:4-6.
To me evolution is Not teaching non-ego but the verses at Philippians 2:3-4 is teaching to do nothing out of egotism, but with humility consider others as superior to you.
Bob the Unbeliever
Well-Known Member
"never heard of him"? WHAT? You QUOTED his CARTOON! Wow.
That's kind of stealing... isn't it?
Bob the Unbeliever
Well-Known Member
Meaningless term. ABSOLUTELY MEANINGLESS, then. You might as well say "GLUB-GLUB" as opposed to "KIND"
You CHANGE the "meaning" of the term to fit WHATEVER YOU WISH, WILLY-NILLY.
As I said before: "Kind" is a BS term, devoid of any use in Intelligent conversation.
siti
Well-Known Member
Not to worry - I can easily see why you might associate Guy's comments with my avatar.Sorry, it was intended for that other guy oops.
Jose Fly
Fisker of men
Chick tract material? Oh for the love of.........something like... ?
which do you think it closer?
You just completely eliminated whatever credibility you had here.
Bob the Unbeliever
Well-Known Member
Agreed-- he claims he never heard of this guy-- but was willing to pass on one of Chick's ugly memes?
That's not good, credibility-wise.
I did Not change the meaning of the term ' kind ' because the term 'kind ' is found in Scripture.
Each reproduces according to its ' kind '.
Not asking for use in any conversation intelligent or otherwise, just letting you know what the Bible teaches.
Cats will remain cats, dogs will remain dogs, within their ' kinds '.
Bob the Unbeliever
Well-Known Member
I am aware the bible is grossly wrong on this issue-- it is one of countless reasons why the bible cannot possibly be from a god-- too many mistakes like this one.
Except that isn't how it actually works, is it?
A simplistic observation easily demonstrates that isn't how life actually works on Earth-- dogs and wolves being the funniest and best proof--- they most certainly are not the same kind. Yet, you can create hybrid offspring that are non-sterile. Proof that your statement "dogs will remain dogs" is 100% false.
Were that NOT the case? There would be no chihuahuas, no French Poodles, no dachshunds, no bull dogs, no Irish Wolf Hounds, no German Shepherds, no Australian Blue Heelers--- NONE OF THAT COULD HAPPEN, if "dogs remain dogs".
We can show Evolution is True quite easy enough--- and that the primitive Bronze Age bible is quite False.
It is not MY fault your worldview prevents you from seeing Reality.