Monk Of Reason
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
Somewhat true yes. But it is randomness and chances within the confines of reality and laws.Has to do with randomness and chances.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Somewhat true yes. But it is randomness and chances within the confines of reality and laws.Has to do with randomness and chances.
For reals?Did this software magically write itself or was it written on purpose? which is more plausible?
Yet you dont.point being; between chance and design, which one is extraordinary magic and which is the norm depends entirely on the frame of reference right?- which we just don't have for how universes and life 'usually' appear-
there's no default answer to this, have to look at the individual merits of each.
You must have some weird idea of what "logic" is.Without using logic you may think of God as being magic, not seeing or tracing God doesn't mean he isn't existing.
Inanimate nature.Who is much clever, you or the inanimate nature ?
Please explain this logic. An argument from incredulity is not logic.
If God doesn't use magic, what mechanism does He use? If he leaves thing to happen through the ordinary laws of chemistry and physics already in place, then He is superfluous and useless. If He actively intervenes in the happenings on Earth, then he does so by magic.
Sure, why not?
Lava launched into the air can assume all kinds of shapes as it cools into glass.
Well, if God existed, I don't see how there would be inanimate nature, unless God accidentally makes things that he isn't aware of happening before hand. Nature would be infused with God's intention. It may be inanimate but it is of and acts because of the direction of an animate being.
But, I don't get existed. And I also don't think nature has any ability of thinking, nor the intentions to be anything in particular, so I don't cleverness is an attribute one could apply to nature.
I'd assume the chances of that happening to be slim. There's very few instances where geometric shapes are that simple in nature.
No matter what sort of seed I could think of, rolling it up in clay, and over and over until it hardens into bone would never work, if I, or you, or any other being on Earth did it. But if God does it, it works. Why is it that when God does it, it makes bone, but when you or I do it, it doesn't make bone?
The inanimate nature can't be clever, but do you think our brains were designed by a clever process or were just a product of the inanimate nature ?
Through billions of years the nature wasn't able to produce a single perfect cup of glass but it produced the intelligent humans.
Nature made life whereas we can't, why the nature can and we can't ?
Who knows? They just are. 2+2=4, E=MC^2.And where did laws come from at first place ?
There is no mechanism selecting for a "perfect glass." On the other hand, there are perfectly understandable and demonstrable mechanisms to account for the much more complex forms we see in Nature.A perfect cup of glass can be one, do you have an evidence that such things had happened ?
Because nature is far more complicated than what is intuitive to our minds.
By this is avoiding the question.
If I do what God did to make bone, by placing seed in clay and rolling it up over and over, I'd never make bone. Neither would any human. But God did make bone. So what did God do other than what the Qur'an says he did, that isn't magic, to make the process work, when I can't make it work?
Different processes are required for creating each of those things. It's like arguing that since a computer-manufacturing plant can't make cups of glass then it can't make computers either. Unlike a cup of glass, living things have genes which are subject to mutation and selection and which can be passed on by reproduction. That is what allows them to improve over the generations. A cup of glass has none of those properties.Through billions of years the nature wasn't able to produce a single perfect cup of glass but it produced the intelligent humans.
That's magic.Who knows? They just are.
Different processes are required for creating each of those things. It's like arguing that since a computer-manufacturing plant can't make cups of glass then it can't make computers either. Unlike a cup of glass, living things have genes which are subject to mutation and selection and which can be passed on by reproduction. That is what allows them to improve over the generations. A cup of glass has none of those properties.
Because your question doesn't make any sense, it's like asking if i put flour with water and rolling it up over and over again then why it doesn't turn to bread.
Laws = relationships and values.That's magic.
RNA preceded DNA...