Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I can't help but think this doesn't really mean anything. A lot of metaphysical stuff is just like this -- lots of words, no real meat to them.According to my beliefs, the nature of the soul is a mystery.
“Thou hast asked Me concerning the nature of the soul. Know, verily, that the soul is a sign of God, a heavenly gem whose reality the most learned of men hath failed to grasp, and whose mystery no mind, however acute, can ever hope to unravel. It is the first among all created things to declare the excellence of its Creator, the first to recognize His glory, to cleave to His truth, and to bow down in adoration before Him. If it be faithful to God, it will reflect His light, and will, eventually, return unto Him. If it fail, however, in its allegiance to its Creator, it will become a victim to self and passion, and will, in the end, sink in their depths.”
Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, pp. 158-159
In order to act on the brain -- to any effect whatever on the brain, and therefore the person whose brain it is -- it must have some means of communicating with that brain. This requires making physical changes to that brain -- something that seems quite impossible since the soul apparently has no existence within physical reality. Only within something else, not known to exist, that some would seem to think of as "spiritual reality."However, the function of the soul can be known.
The soul animates the body and gives it life. The soul communicates its desires through the brain to the physical body, which thereby expresses itself, so the soul is responsible for the mind, senses and emotions as well as physical sensations. The soul, working through the brain, is responsible for all our thought processes.
The body needs a soul to direct its processes, but the body is just the medium through which the soul functions while we are alive on earth in a physical body. The soul is our true self, the sum total of the personality, the person himself; the physical body is pure matter with no real identity. The person, after he dies and leaves his physical body behind, goes to the spiritual world where the soul takes on a spiritual body made up of heavenly elements that exist in the spiritual realm. Since all we have ever experienced is physical, it is impossible for us to understand what it is like to be living as a purely spiritual being rather than a physical body.
Yes, well humans have imagined no end of ridiculous things, haven't they?Do animals have soul? At one time it was thought that even Africans do not have soul.
No.Isn't it curious that labels like "christian" or "hindu" or "muslim" etc don't make a difference when you ask people what something like gravity is?
.
Consider.
Easily said, but just what is the nature of this immortal spiritual or immaterial part of a human being?soul
/sōl/
Learn to pronounce
noun
noun: soul; plural noun: souls
1.the spiritual or immaterial part of a human being or animal, regarded as immortal.
.
.
Consider.
Easily said, but just what is the nature of this immortal spiritual or immaterial part of a human being?
soul
/sōl/
Learn to pronounce
noun
noun: soul; plural noun: souls
1.the spiritual or immaterial part of a human being or animal, regarded as immortal.
.
The soul works through the brain and mind while we are alive in a physical body, so it can be seen in our thoughts and emotions. My point was that it is the soul that allows the brain matter to function. Without the soul we would be as dead beingsI am not averse to the idea of personality or individual character being equated as the soul. Clearly there are properties that are uniquely expressed for all of us. But is this evidence the soul or is it some emergent property of the matter that is our brain, neurons, hormones combined with experiences?
That is why I said that the NATURE of the soul is a mystery. There is no way to describe the soul's nature. All we can say is how it expresses itself.We can equate functions to it, but a more concrete description is clearly not so simple.
So is the one!Whatever you say.
Since the soul comes into being at the moment of conception from the joining of the sperm and egg, it must have a hereditary counterpart. Much of what makes us who we are comes also from our early life experiences, but it is the soul that is affected, not the body. The body is pure matter with no identity.Of course I've wondered - I probably still have an Eysenck paperback from the 1960s when I first became interested in psychology and what makes us tick. Current evidence seems to suggest that much comes from our parents (genes), whilst some probably comes from our early environment and what we experience - hence so many disorders often coming from such. No signs of a soul to me. The soul is an unnecessary addition to personality and character - which are hardly fixed - and presumably where many believe the soul to be such.
I agree, but the question is what makes us sad. Is it simply chemical reactions in the brain or is it something more? I am saying that it is the soul that makes us happy or sad, the soul working through the brain and mind.I think it is the simple sadness of loss that accounts for our grief, and something that usually fades with time, for most, even if the memories will usually remain to lessen our sadness. Death of someone always reminds us of our own eventual death, so doubly troubling.
I do not believe that animals have a rational soul like humans because they cannot reason in the abstract like humans or know and worship God, but animals clearly they have a personality and a spirit. What happens to that spirit after they dies us a subject of much controversy among believers. I believe it continues to exist in some fashion.I would suspect that most pet owners (including yourself) would assign a personality to their pets, differentiating them from other pets they have or just recognising that they don't just react 'like dumb animals'. Would this indicate the existence of souls within, or perhaps more like other animals having many features common to us - that is, different personalities and characters (because they have intelligence and thinking to some extent), and hence different behaviours?
That is also one of my pet peeves, the religious belief that humans are so superior to animals, special.One of my bugbears - anything (like lack of souls in other animals) that tends to separate us from all other life.
I believe that the Bible does bot support this definition..
Consider.
Easily said, but just what is the nature of this immortal spiritual or immaterial part of a human being?
soul
/sōl/
Learn to pronounce
noun
noun: soul; plural noun: souls
1.the spiritual or immaterial part of a human being or animal, regarded as immortal.
.
Since the soul comes into being at the moment of conception from the joining of the sperm and egg, it must have a hereditary counterpart. Much of what makes us who we are comes also from our early life experiences, but it is the soul that is affected, not the body. The body is pure matter with no identity.
You won't see signs of a soul because the soul is invisible. It is like a stage director that works behind the scenes throughout your life and after death, for all eternity.
I agree, but the question is what makes us sad. Is it simply chemical reactions in the brain or is it something more? I am saying that it is the soul that makes us happy or sad, the soul working through the brain and mind.
I do not believe that animals have a rational soul like humans because they cannot reason in the abstract like humans or know and worship God, but animals clearly they have a personality and a spirit. What happens to that spirit after they dies us a subject of much controversy among believers. I believe it continues to exist in some fashion.
That is also one of my pet peeves, the religious belief that humans are so superior to animals, special.
The physical brain is pure matter with no identity whereas the soul is our identity, the sum total of the personality.How do you tell the difference between the "soul" and the physical brain?
I was not implying that animals have no reasoning ability, only that they do not have the same ability to reason in as humans. Clearly there are things we do not yet know about animals, science is constantly evolving.Well at least we agree on one thing - the last point.
But I think you are probably wrong about them not being able to reason, given that many are capable of solving problems that are not natural to their normal environments.
I believe certain things as an aspect of theology, but haven't the least clue if observed manifestations reveal a soul or not. I too consider it a mystery.The soul works through the brain and mind while we are alive in a physical body, so it can be seen in our thoughts and emotions. My point was that it is the soul that allows the brain matter to function. Without the soul we would be as dead beings
That is why I said that the NATURE of the soul is a mystery. There is no way to describe the soul's nature. All we can say is how it expresses itself.
Happy Birthday!So is the one!
You: We are all the one. (to that effect)
Me: Two!
You are doing an over-reductive claim to oneness.
Reality can never be one, because other humans can do differently than you.
So different is the same as one. That is absurd. Meaningful and absurd is the same as one. Again nothing but absurdity.
I believe that the Bible does bot support this definition.
The first souls were created when a physical body joined with the breath of God. The Bible says they became Living souls. Obviously then without both factors, life, and a physical body, a soul does not exist.
The immaterial part of the person is personality, memories, knowledge. These exist with God, to be reunited with the soul once again at Gods will.
The very first lie ever told was "you will not die", i.e. you have an immortal soul, you can never die.
From this has been extrapolated eternal hell where people are burned and punished forever.
So, God wants to eradicate sin in his creation, yet He preserves part of it to put sinful people and commit everlasting atrocities on them. Which in it's ugliness is unfair. A person in hell 5,000 years ago has been tortured 5,000 years more than someone who dies today. Thus their sins, though maybe less severe, nets them 5,000 more years of torture.
A God of infinite justice cannot do this, it is unjust. A God of infinite mercy cannot support eternal pain and torture, it is totally unmerciful.
The person who chooses to reject God, receives capital punishment, they cease to exist, forever.
God will remain, infinitely just, infinitely merciful, Forever.
Sin, and the poor bodies ravaged by it will cease to exist. They will sleep forever, by Gods mercy.
Oh, hell, no !!!, at least as many believe it is.
You are welcome to your belief. I have no problem with such if that's what floats your boat. Souls just don't figure in my world view because they seem an unnecessary adjunct and just another thing to take 'on faith'.