• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Faith in Buddhism

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
The term "faith" appears to be a good translation of the Sanskrit "sraddha".

Merriam-Webster defines "faith" as "strong belief or trust in someone or something."

Wikipedia defines "faith in Buddhism" (or sraddha) as "an initial acceptance of the Buddha's teaching prior to realising its truth for oneself. It is an important constituent element of all traditions of Buddhism, although the kind and nature of faith changes in the different schools. Other translations of saddhā/śraddhā include confidence and trust.[1] "
Merriam Webster has a different definition of 'faith' specific to the context of religion - you have mistaken it for the non religious meaning.
 

Gambit

Well-Known Member
You don't seem to have a lot of sympathy or respect for skepticism, from what I have seen.

I believe in appropriate skepticism. But I fail to see what relevance this has to the OP of this thread and my claim that there's faith in Buddhism.
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
I believe in appropriate skepticism. But I fail to see what relevance this has to the OP of this thread and my claim that there's faith in Buddhism.
Well in that it is not faith as it is defined in the context of religion - belief without evidence.
 

Gambit

Well-Known Member
Merriam Webster has a different definition of 'faith' specific to the context of religion - you have mistaken it for the non religious meaning.

I gave the general definition which applies how faith is employed in all contexts.
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
I gave the general definition which applies how faith is employed in all contexts.
No, you missed the definition given for the religious context. You quoted Merriam Webster, the relevant definition is identified in 2.
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
Gambit

FYI, this is the Merriam entry on faith in the context of religion; 2. strong belief in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual conviction rather than proof.

"bereaved people who have shown supreme faith"
 

Jumi

Well-Known Member
I documented my claim that faith plays a pivotal role in Buddhism (your personal objections not withstanding).
You just used a bad article on wikipedia and think you know something based on it is what I have a problem with. Buddhism I have little interest in.
 

Gambit

Well-Known Member
You just used a bad article on wikipedia and think you know something based on it is what I have a problem with. Buddhism I have little interest in.

That explains why you have very little knowledge of it.
 
Last edited:

MonkeyFire

Well-Known Member
It's a better approach that way Imo.

Faith is like having luggage that you use to carry around whatever you like with the hope the zipper is closed properly, so as nothing spills out.
.
If Buddhism employed faith for understanding, then I suppose it's another venue by which the matter of faith settles well with practice then blows away with the dust upon realization.

If faith remains undifferentiated by which Buddhism is practiced, at least later on as understanding deepens, it's likely you won't get trapped by those definitions when people tout faith as being the/a precursor for Buddhist practice.


.

Then again its when we let go of love or knowledge that we find faith. Both are important.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
The bottom line is that faith plays a pivotal role in traditional and historical Buddhism (contrary to objections of secular Buddhists).
No, fair person. The bottom line is instead that meanings matter and that stubborn opposition to secularism is foolish.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
I gave the general definition
Thus ignoring the actual situation.

That is not acting in good faith, though, nor is it correct usage of a dictionary.

Sort of underscores the issue, come to think of it.

Are you a lawyer, perchance?

which applies how faith is employed in all contexts.

Now, that. That resides somewhere between unashamed wishful thinking and just lying.
 
Top