Trailblazer
Veteran Member
Why not, because it would fail the test?I'm agreeing with you.
You shouldn't test your faith.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why not, because it would fail the test?I'm agreeing with you.
You shouldn't test your faith.
If you used your faith to fabricate things you had a perverse view of faith. I have no need to fabricate anything with my faith. Faith is very efficacious at dealing with the very real issues of life.Of course I did. Christianity among other religions do it all the time because I believed it regardless of the inability to prove and substantiate my beliefs.
So faith became the centerpiece, and made into something noble and virtuous sounding when in reality , faith isn't something I'd recommend people to rely on as if it's absolutely true and reliable without recourse.
Some people rely upon what is in the Bible rather than thinking for themselves. I find that very tragic.People rely on their own cognition instead of trusting God. I find that very tragic.
Ok, then I have faith that bigfoot exists. Is that the same faith as you have in God?No it's faith and your last sentence proves it.
which is what most Christians don't want to do because they are sure they are right.In my opinion, it wouldn't be failure but rather a genuine reexamination of their beliefs
That all depends upon who or what you are trusting....Trust but verify.
No there's far more evidence for God than for bigfoot.Ok, then I have faith that bigfoot exists. Is that the same faith as you have in God?
Some attack without discussing the issue but some do discuss the issue.Basically, I agree with you about being on the potter's wheel. However, there are quite a few people on this forum who attack me and others for our faith (as opposed to discussing the issue). To me, that is from Satan, so they are spiritually dead.
So faith requires evidence then?No there's far more evidence for God than for bigfoot.
Oh course it's my opinion and few people hold opinions they think are wrong. Btw are you the cops? If so I'll be careful not to incriminate myself around you. I figure since the mods have addressed me in the past when I went "afoul" of the rules ill wait for them to address me if i run afoul again. Another forum I'm on doesn't allow poster to play mod.In your opinion, of course, because otherwise you could run afoul of the rule prohibiting members from stating their personal opinion and belief as a definitive matter of fact. Naturally, as a devout theist, you wouldn't violate the rules that you agreed to follow when you joined the forum. Am I right?
And just who do you think created the natural world?No. Been down that road.
I don't need to embellish or fabricate the natural world here beyond what it actually brings to the table.
What I practice now can even be barely called a religion. In fact, I doubt it is one actually aside from the philosophical gleenings I entertain.
All in all , it's been a wonderful, at times a terrifying thing to allow the natural world call the shots on its own terms as I stay silent and observe and listen without my input getting in the way of the actual picture.
Can't ask for a better 'cathedral' or 'priest' than the natural universe itself on its own terms and its something I can actually see and experience without the need to pretend or fabricate past any of it.
You just beat me to the punch.I nominate this to be the most ironic post in the thread.
Hebrews 11:1, "Now faith is being sure of what we hope for, being convinced of what we do not see."So faith requires evidence then?
Bigfoot has more evidence than god, We have video footage, foot prints, photos, sound recordings, nests have been found unlike for god.
Like your evidence for god we have stories of ancient peoples telling about them, we also have personal encounters with them, books written about them.
Romans 1:19-20a, "For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. Ever since the creation of the world God’s eternal power and divine nature, invisible though they are, have been seen and understood through the things God has made."No there's far more evidence for God than for bigfoot.
I agree, so the hundred dollar question is: Is the Bible evidence that God exists or that anything in it is true?Even trust should require evidence.
Faith without evidence is blind faith.I never questions one's faith I question their reasoning for belief. If someone does not want a conversation about their faith I respect that. But believing things to be true by faith is unreliable not noble.
I agree, so the hundred dollar question is: Is the Bible evidence that God exists or that anything in it is true?
I agree with you.Hebrews 11:1, "Now faith is being sure of what we hope for, being convinced of what we do not see."
Faith does not require evidence. If it did, it would not be faith.
Hmm, This is the issue with religion. I get conflicting ideas about what faith is. Jimb says faith does not require evidence. How do I know what is right if any?Faith without evidence is blind faith.
No thanks.
This is evidence the bible is not true. It is not plain to me god is needed to create the world.Romans 1:19-20a, "For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. Ever since the creation of the world God’s eternal power and divine nature, invisible though they are, have been seen and understood through the things God has made."