• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Far-rightists on this site?

Should there be subforums for the far-right on RF?

  • Yes

    Votes: 17 60.7%
  • No

    Votes: 11 39.3%

  • Total voters
    28

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
Hey. I don't call myself fascist, but it is probably the closest thing to my views. I'm not racially motivated in any way, though. A nationalist libertarian would also be close. I support a government that acts for its people first, middle, and last, and I've the good fortune to have been born to a nation whose traditional people are not a genetic stock, but an ideological one
Interesting. I would love to hear more about your views. How do you square Fascism with libertarianism? What are your views on national rebirth and the past? How do you view totalitarianism and imperialism?
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
No, not that. Others can talk about that if they want. I'm more interested in discussing the failures of degenerate modernity, identity, cultural renewal and pride, tradition and the path we should take bring rebirth and prosperity to Western culture.

So maybe a topic could be "standing up for western values" ?
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
Ok. So I believe western secularism is simply a better cultural norm than what any Muslim majority society offers. Is that a "far right" opinion?
No, that's a mainstream secular humanist opinion. I personally don't really believe in secularism. I view it as a holdover from Christianity. I want all aspects of society and nature to be resacralized. I want a return to the Pagan worldview in society.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
No, that's a mainstream secular humanist opinion. I personally don't really believe in secularism. I view it as a holdover from Christianity. I want all aspects of society and nature to be resacralized. I want a return to the Pagan worldview in society.

Hmmm, i might call myself SH who places a high, high value on nature - not quite sure that that's Pagan though.
 

Kirran

Premium Member
I kind of agree with the whole "resacralisation" thing - I think that the whole "religion" construct born from the Mediterranean has been a problem, basically cos of exclusivism and such - but I don't know what we can do about it.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Does not require, but very rarely the case.
Well, if we have fascists here who don't preach racism, I wouldn't prevent them from
airing their views just because it can be associated with racism. Communism cannot
be found without mass murder, yet none of the communists here advocate that.
 

Mindmaster

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Far right? How bleeding edge are we talking? Alt-Right-wackos? There is already a Conservative Only forum, why have another that virtually no one will use?

I find it moderately humorous that people associate the alt-right with conservatives, but I digress that the far right has never really been the "alt-right". Mostly, what you have in the alt-right are people who don't fit the mold - gay conservatives, progressives conservatives (center-right), right leaning libertarians, etc, for example. I honestly do not feel that there are many on this board equipped to differentiate the difference due the inherent leanings and bias of the membership, in general.

Socialism/communism are OK but fascists are *bad*! Both of these ideologies have killed a lot of people, none of them deserve airspace if you ask me. Socialism/communism has killed more people than Hitler by a long shot... But, it's perfectly "acceptable". :D
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
Neither of them uses the Nazi label, but one is not a Hindu with a nazi swastika tattoo who has called for genocide on multiple occasions (and is currently banned) and the other has praised what Hitler did for Germany, so I think the assumption is fair.

Edit: Said user with the tattoo is not the lovely Aupmanyav. To my knowledge, said user is a former white nationalist.
If they don't call themselves such, probably shouldn't call them that. Especially when they can't speak for themselves.
 
Last edited:

Kirran

Premium Member
Socialism/communism are OK but fascists are *bad*! Both of these ideologies have killed a lot of people, none of them deserve airspace if you ask me. Socialism/communism has killed more people than Hitler by a long shot... But, it's perfectly "acceptable". :D

More about intent, really.
 

Nietzsche

The Last Prussian
Premium Member
Socialism/communism are OK but fascists are *bad*! Both of these ideologies have killed a lot of people, none of them deserve airspace if you ask me. Socialism/communism has killed more people than Hitler by a long shot... But, it's perfectly "acceptable". :D
I don't know how many times I have to explain this. But here it goes again;

National Socialism's purpose, the ideology's very core tenets, its raison d'être, was the extermination of people they didn't like.

Communism's brutality occurred for pragmatic, not ideological, reasons.
 

Kirran

Premium Member
And there are very different and varying schools within both socialism and communism, while we're at it, whereas fascism and National Socialism are pretty united.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
And there are very different and varying schools within both socialism and communism, while we're at it, whereas fascism and National Socialism are pretty united.
Fascism and NS are not united ideologies. There's great variance between the different movements.
 
Top