You asked for evidence that the appointees were biased
No, that's not what I asked for.
Again, you seem to be confused regarding the steps and roles in this process. The House Committee is basically the investigation phase, where they are looking into
all aspects of the Jan. 6 attempted insurrection, such as what led to it, whether some folks should have known it was likely to happen, what preparations (or lack thereof) were taken, and how to prevent it from happening again.
If the Committee finds evidence of criminal activity, they will refer that to the appropriate law enforcement entities, who will then conduct their own review of the evidence, and if appropriate will charge and arrest the suspects.
Then (unless a deal is reached) the suspects will go to court and a potential trial.
Try and keep all that in mind.
I gave it to you.if you have no problem with two people that said they would impeach Trump for things the F.B.I says there is no supporting evidence for serving on the committee then I'd say you have no desire for truth or fairness and you are either being willfully ignorant or purposely stupid.
Again, you seem to be confused about the facts here.
The FBI found that there wasn't any evidence that Trump
pre-planned or coordinated the attempted insurrection. The House never accused Trump of that. They accused Trump of inciting the mob to storm the Capitol, but they didn't accuse him of planning to do so ahead of time, or personally coordinating with the insurrectionists.
Understand?