Since I really haven't been following this as close as a lot of people this is what I understand, or think I understand. Enlighten me if I'm mistaken
1. FBI Director sends letter to Congress saying they are re-opening the investigation
a. I would have to assume that he means the investigation of the Hillary email issue
2. New information came to light during the investigation of Weiner's sexting escapades.
a. Information came from various electronic devices that both Weiner and his estranged wife, Huma , own.
3. We, the general public, have no idea what this information is
a. I would have to assume that it would have to be about something Hillary sent to Huma due to the assumption in 1a.
>>3. We, the general public, have no idea what this information is<<
Aside from the weirdness, the real issue is #3.
Part of it is explained by an intelligent Democrat:
"
Two Points About the Hillary Clinton Email Fiasco
William J. Astore Posted on
October 30, 2016
Much is being made of Hillary Clinton’s private email server, which she used when she was Secretary of State. To me, the real issue is not that Hillary
endangered national security by sending classified information in the clear. No – the real issue is that the Clintons act as if they are above the rules and laws that apply to “the little people.” They are superior and smug, totally devoted to themselves and their pursuit of power and the privileges that come with it. It’s a matter of character, in other words. Hillary’s evasiveness, her lack of transparency, her self-righteousness, her strong sense of her own rectitude, make her a dangerous candidate for the presidency.
My second point is this: The issue of classification should be turned on its head. The real issue is not that Hillary potentially revealed secrets. No – the real issue is that our government keeps far too much from us. Our government uses security classification not so much to keep us safe, but to keep the national security state safe – safe from the eyes of the American people.
As
The Guardian reported in 2013:
“A committee established by Congress, the Public Interest Declassification Board, warned in December that rampant over-classification is ‘imped[ing] informed government decisions and an informed public’ and, worse, ‘enabl[ing] corruption and malfeasance’. In one instance it documented, a government agency was found to be classifying one petabyte of new data every 18 months, the equivalent of 20m filing cabinets filled with text.”
Nowadays, seemingly everything is classified. And if it’s classified, if it’s secret, we can’t know about it. Because we can’t be trusted with it. That’s a fine idea for an autocracy or dictatorship, but not so fine for a democracy.
Government of the people, by the people, for the people? Impossible when nearly everything of any importance is classified.
Too bad Hillary didn’t send
everything in the clear – what a service she would have done for the American people and for democracy!"
https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2016/10/30/two-points-about-the-hillary-clinton-email-fiasco/
Today, we know the media does not present unbiased, uncensored or unfiltered news and give their opinions in the editorial. Instead, their view is in the news and the editorial. Yesterday, I found out that our major social media including reddit is censored, too.
So, to get what you want in #3, you have to go to the less reported sources.
