• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

FBI reopens investigation into HIllary's Server... and now what?

idav

idav

Being
Premium Member
ShivaFan said:
BREAKING NOW!

650,000 Emails on the laptop.
Click to expand...
Takes a lot of leaps of logic to connect a pedo to his wife then to her boss. Not surprising that the scum had his wifes info on his laptop. What the heck that has to do with Hillary is ridiculous to even think about. Talk about people phishing.
The BEST election, yet!
Click to expand...
Like the best reality series ever. I almost expect to see something new on Trump other than a dozen more sexual assault allegations.
 
Scuba Pete

Scuba Pete

Le plongeur avec attitude...
Revoltingest said:
You made the usual mistake of presuming something without question.
Click to expand...
I didn't presume a thing. I wasn't addressing you, but the attitude of the quote. You've got to work on your comprehension and stop making assumptions. However, it the shoe fits, then you're in luck. :D :D :D
 
james bond

james bond

Well-Known Member
More on Lynch. No transparency under Obama.

"Free Beacon: Loretta Lynch 'Pleads Fifth' on Iran Ransom Probe
Attorney General Loretta Lynch is declining to comply with a probe into the Obama administration's secret efforts to send Iran $1.7 billion in cash earlier this year to avoid incriminating herself, according to The Washington Free Beacon.

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and Kansas Rep. Mike Pompeo wrote in a letter that Lynch chose to "essentially plead the Fifth," after the Republican lawmakers presented her with questions about the cash payment.


In an Oct. 24 response, Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik responded for Lynch, refusing to answer the questions and telling the lawmakers that they are barred from publicly revealing details about the payment.

"Disclosure of this information beyond members of the House and Senate and staff who are able to view them could adversely affect the diplomatic relations of the United States, including with key allies," Kadzik wrote.

"It is frankly unacceptable that your department refuses to answer straightforward questions from the people's elected representatives in Congress about an important national security issue," Rubio and Pompeo wrote.


"Your staff failed to address any of our questions, and instead provided a copy of public testimony and a lecture about the sensitivity of information associated with this issue. As the United States' chief law enforcement officer, it is outrageous that you would essentially plead the Fifth and refuse to respond to inquiries."

They attached the questions again and requested that Lynch send answers by Nov. 4.

Rep. Pompeo rebuked the Obama administration about the issue. "Who knew that simple questions regarding Attorney General Lynch's approval of billions of dollars in payments to Iran could be so controversial that she would refuse to answer them?" he asked.


"This has become the Obama administration's coping mechanism for anything related to the Islamic Republic of Iran — hide information, obfuscate details, and deny answers to Congress and the American people."

Pompeo hopes the administration would begin to take their "professional, and moral," obligations seriously.

Details about the Iran deal are being kept in a secure facility, and any lawmakers who have clearance to view them must give up cell phones and are not allowed to take notes, the Free Beacon first disclosed.


Other efforts have been launched to unearth a full accounting of the Iran negotiations.

One senior congressional source told the Free Beacon that the administration "appears to be "running for cover" from the issue.

"Evidently Attorney General Lynch and the Department of Justice have decided 'refusal to cooperate' is their best strategy. But this is dangerous and ultimately won't protect them from anything," the source said.

The Iran deal is an "unfolding disaster," Rubio wrote in an op-ed for CNN."

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Loretta-Lynch-Pleads-Fifth-Iran-Ransom/2016/10/28/id/755849/
 
ShivaFan

ShivaFan

Satyameva Jayate
Premium Member
After the Weiner home discovery, a lot of people are asking why is Hillary Clinton above the law considering she is equally as egregious and even more so having compromised the personal life and safety of Americans and their children, and considering the proven fact of Bill Clinton's multiple connections to known criminals and pedophiles, and Weiner who is a sexual predator of underage minors, there is now a growing demand for an inventory of her Chappaqua mansion, certainly that would be most revealing.

A clearer picture is coming into focus that there are not just a dump truck full of emails found with classified and sensitive information throughout, but that Huma was the conduit between the Secretary of State/Clinton Crime Syndicate operations and the wealthy crony capitalist donors, "arrangers" and "fixers" including rouge lawyers, and other criminals including globally and in finance and "investing", that Huma was that "junket girl" that has come up and she worked the communications to help cover so that Hillary would not have to dirty her hands to pass on inside information to donors, she simply had Huma and her underlings do it, but likely Hillary was too "hands on" to just let the operation do it's job and she also left too many footprints all over this and it is all on Anthony Weiner's pedophile laptop. Don't be surprised if Bill Clinton's name pops up in relation to Weiner's own sex connections, either.

Basically the raw mindset and philosophy of the Clinton "foundation" is becoming clear:

“We kill what we can not control.”

But they were also deluded thinking they were already in control of the killing.
 
ShivaFan

ShivaFan

Satyameva Jayate
Premium Member
Another aspect now emerging is the Yahoo factor, the FBI and Congress must move on their legal authority to have Yahoo disclose the IPs belonging to these third parties and these foreign third parties who had access to read in real time and in non-redacted form the emails, encrypted (and considering what computer illiterates these Clinton cronies and Hillary herself are - unencrypted) attachments that Abedin forwarded to the various @yahoo.com's that ended up on Wiener’s laptop - at least two-thirds of Abedin’s released emails were forwarded by this computer illiterate to personal addresses she controlled. I think the NYPR with it's very effective anti-terrorism units have already got the dope on some of these IPs and that is in the "bombshell".
 
Revoltingest

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Scuba Pete said:
Srsly? We agree. No one should have that attitude, and I explained why. Now, you're just arguing for argument's sake.
Click to expand...
You so misunderstand.
To post a news item calling for Hillary's dropping out
is not to advocate such. I've clearly stated that this
is not good reason for her to drop out. For you to
disagree is pointless & incorrect gainsaying.
 
Shadow Wolf

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Too bad we can't take a betting pool over these emails having incriminating evidence or is a bunch of nothing like the last few times. People are so convinced Hillary is already a criminal I may walk out a millionaire if there's nothing there this time.
 
Revoltingest

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Shadow Wolf said:
Too bad we can't take a betting pool over these emails having incriminating evidence or is a bunch of nothing like the last few times. People are so convinced Hillary is already a criminal I may walk out a millionaire if there's nothing there this time.
Click to expand...
Why can't you start a pool?
We could bet with frubals.
But we'd need an agreed upon standard for what's incriminating.
 
W

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
Perhaps that's why the FBI was wiling to get rid of the laptops, to not drag the White House in, NotANum

By that do you mean intentionally breaking the law or breaking the law with plausible deniability, Revolting?
 
Last edited:
Underhill

Underhill

Well-Known Member
whirlingmerc said:
quote

The FBI has reopened its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while secretary of state, in a stunning turn of events just days before the presidential election.

FBI Director James Comey wrote in a letter to top members of Congress Friday that the bureau has “learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation.”

unquote

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/28/fbi-reopens-investigation-into-clinton-email-use.html
Click to expand...

Nothing...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top