Notanumber
A Free Man
That is a little harsh, but the Clinton's are not only petty but vindictive as well.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
FBI reopens investigation into HIllary's Server... and now what?
- Thread starter whirlingmerc
- Start date
-
- Tags
- hillary campaign
That is a little harsh, but the Clinton's are not only petty but vindictive as well.
Scuba Pete
Le plongeur avec attitude...
Oh please, that's not harsh at all. You're projecting yourself on them, that's all.
Notanumber
A Free Man
Someone is a little confused and it's not me.
The statement could be way more true if you replace Clinton with Trump.
Scuba Pete
Le plongeur avec attitude...
Trump is the pettiest person I have ever witnessed in my life.
No. If this happened to Trump he would be threatening to either sue Comey, or put him in jail. Or both.
Scuba Pete
Le plongeur avec attitude...
Wrong? No, not really... just nothing much relevant. He keeps talking about how bad these are going to be and they just aren't.
james bond
Well-Known Member
I agree, but the media will not remain unbiased. They're already blaming Comey and DOJ is claiming he wasn't supposed to influence an election. The election is still rigged.
esmith
Veteran Member
Hillary supports will blame Comey and DOJ for doing this now, if he waited until after the election then made the announcement what do you think the outcry would be?
From the other side.
Oh, well.....any progress, however small it be, is worth enjoying.
Wirey
Fartist
As a public servant he was correct to decline charges initially, and also to bring this up before the Yanks accidentally elect a crook.
Accidentally?
It's tens of thousands, so my info is right.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-laptop-had-tens-thousands-emails-source.html
And it's funny in that, Hillary said she wants the FBI to "clarify" what was found to the public...
... I just heard someone who seems to be more often "right on" than wrong, just say that by next week the FBI is going to do just that - and call Hillary's "demand" (bluff) and give it right back to her, release a big dump of the evidence to Congress so the public will know.
And then what will Hillary say?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-laptop-had-tens-thousands-emails-source.html
And it's funny in that, Hillary said she wants the FBI to "clarify" what was found to the public...
... I just heard someone who seems to be more often "right on" than wrong, just say that by next week the FBI is going to do just that - and call Hillary's "demand" (bluff) and give it right back to her, release a big dump of the evidence to Congress so the public will know.
And then what will Hillary say?
Everybody here knows that it is not against the law to have emails on a laptop, right?
BSM1
What? Me worry?
Oh, pleaaaassse... The guy's an idiot. How he got elected in VA in the first place is a mystery.
I'm not sure but probably something along the lines of blaming some "vast right wing conspiracy".
This is Preet Bharara, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York.
The plan of Hillary in collusion with the corrupt AJ DOJ Loretta Lynch, was to have Hillary run around saying "the public has the right to know" regarding what was found on devices of Huma Abedin and her sex offender former husband and Democrat Anthony Weiner who was being investigated for sex offences against a 13 year old minor when the home was searched and the devices found, all the while Hillary would cry foul that the FBI needs to "come clean" with what was found, Lynch acting of behalf of Hillary would not issue the warrant to allow Comey or anyone in the FBI to actually release any of the content to Congress and thus the public which is their obligation to do so.
But it looks like this corruption by the politicized DOJ under Obama and Lynch and Hillary to obstruct this information from Congress and from the public while Hillary shrieks we have "a right to know immediately" is already sunk. Because the NYPD has already taken all of it, has made multiple copies, and Preet Bharara has already issued the subpoena to review Weiner’s devices and warrant already obtained and the content has already been reviewed by NYPD as well as FBI agents and is being reviewed as I type this.
So don't worry, Hillary will probably and regrettably get her wish sooner than later and she will rue the day for what she was shrieking she wants it all public while her operative Lynch purposely obstructs the explosive criminal evidence from Congress and the public.
Sorry Hillary, you may soon get your wish and everybody will have it including Wikileaks. Yes, the public will know, even if your toad and friend Loretta tries to obstruct by holding back on the warrant. Too late. God these people are stupid. Has Loretta Lynch started her diet, yet? Have another shot of gin, Hillary.
Notanumber
A Free Man
I am guessing that Huma has seen the real personality of Hillary over recent days and I bet she doesn’t like what she sees.
Terrywoodenpic
Oldest Heretic
I do not understand what the fuss is about. Emails have been hacked from both private and government servers in the past and will be in the future. There is little between them as regards security.
Clinton has admitted that she has used a private servers and that she was wrong to have done so.
end of story....
finding messages on more servers was a certainty... it is the way it works... much like links in a daisy chain.
To compare such things as a Watergate is just stupid.
There is no evidence at all that any message fell in to enemy hands, or that it caused the slightest harm.
Wikileaks has hacked far more Real secret stuff into the public domain, and continues to do so. The US security system is leaky as a sieve.
Why are the services worried about a leak that has been plugged, when there is a river of uncontrolled leaks.?
Are they taking sides to divert the attention from their own incompetence.?
Clinton has admitted that she has used a private servers and that she was wrong to have done so.
end of story....
finding messages on more servers was a certainty... it is the way it works... much like links in a daisy chain.
To compare such things as a Watergate is just stupid.
There is no evidence at all that any message fell in to enemy hands, or that it caused the slightest harm.
Wikileaks has hacked far more Real secret stuff into the public domain, and continues to do so. The US security system is leaky as a sieve.
Why are the services worried about a leak that has been plugged, when there is a river of uncontrolled leaks.?
Are they taking sides to divert the attention from their own incompetence.?