BTW, did you hear that the TRAIL for Trump U starts on November 28th? That's got to be upsetting.
That's gotta be an interesting 'trail.' Especially since it needed all caps.
Deflections are always interesting when they are worded erroneously.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
BTW, did you hear that the TRAIL for Trump U starts on November 28th? That's got to be upsetting.
An investigation is not a accusation much less a guilty verdict. I choose to wait and see, while the anti-Clinton crowd have an orgy over pretty much nothing at this point.
BTW, did you hear that the TRAIL for Trump U starts on November 28th? That's got to be upsetting.
Re-opened in connection to an unrelated case. Fascinating, that dude Weiner is quite something.quote
The FBI has reopened its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while secretary of state, in a stunning turn of events just days before the presidential election.
FBI Director James Comey wrote in a letter to top members of Congress Friday that the bureau has “learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation.”
unquote
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/28/fbi-reopens-investigation-into-clinton-email-use.html
OMG!!! I've gone and done it now IV MISTSPEEELD A WERD!!! OH THE AD HOM!!! Cats will be living with dogs, rats will overrun the earth and all the other pestilences will be sure to follow.Deflections are always interesting when they are worded erroneously.
This new evidence was not part of what was found (or erased, or bleachbit'ed) on Hillary's servers and other devices, has nothing to do with Wikileaks nor Trump nor any such thing.
This new evidence was found when searching the home of sex offender Anthony Weiner's residence (sexting case and who himself is facing jail time in New York) who was married to Huma Abedin who is Hillary's top aide. She is on the plane with Hillary right now and probably should be grabbed by the FBI to answer a few things as soon as she gets off the plane.
There is NO WAY the FBI would "reopen" (this is not "reopen", it is either a NEW case or additional charges ON TOP of and EXCEEDING the "previous" case which was closed in July) this case unless this new evidence was explosive and with only a week and half before the election.
I suspect the new evidence has nothing per say to do with Anthony. I could be wrong, but I suspect some device was found in the Weiner's house that belonged or belongs to Huma and what was found on the device PROVES HILLARY HAD LIED TO BOTH THE FBI AND CONGRESS regarding not only the emails and national security violations but other matters as well.
This will not be resolved before election day. It will go right to election day, and WILL impact the election. And even if she gets elected, her only option will be to try and "pardon herself" because there is no way the FBI would get in on this after closure back in July unless it was now criminal. If she gets elected, she is probably facing hearings et all, and should be impeached.
I think this can easily destroy her campaign at this juncture while she is imploding and her polls are diving. This isn't going to help. I guess that explains why, as this news was breaking just as she was getting off a plane in Iowa to a "rally" before a small crowd that she would not answer anything to the shouting reporters and why when she got up on the stage she started shrieking and mumbling and then the "Trump is a racist" SOP but explains her totally bizarre and vague shout "Trump a sexual predator of a teenage girl" with no details or evidence but some bizarre statement to try and distract and I think this means she was on the cell phone (which was also probably hacked) finding out about the breaking news and then decides that what has to be done is to launch another totally phony attack and lie on Trump to try and distract from this explosive news about her. But I don't think even that will work, after all, this entire thing with the new evidence in itself involves her close friend and sex offender Anthony and that bizarre wife of his.
In an era of bring your own device, IT have there hands full for sure. As such I would never recommend a tech to install a private server for employees. Bad enough everyone has smartphones and laptops.It wouldn't be good in my opinion if those 2 were found to have classified information on their devices.
If this was anyone with an "R" next to their name, it would be a guaranteed non-issue.
From what I saw they are investigating someone else. Unless I misread do illuminate us slow readers.Finally someone has a sense of decency to make double sure no criminal enters the oval office. Kudos to the FBI and all who see corruption for what it is.
From what I saw they are investigating someone else. Unless I misread do illuminate us slow readers.
Ok just to help with the case of the typical smugness that seems to have infected a few folks.From what I saw they are investigating someone else. Unless I misread do illuminate us slow readers.
While investigating an unrelated case potential new evidence relating to Clinton was found.
Ok so a read that. Now rereading says it was carefully worded and the emails may not even be significant. I guess I am catching that right.Ok just to help with the case of the typical smugness that seems to have infected a few folks.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cn...r-tells-senate-judiciary-committee/index.html
Ok so a read that. Now rereading says it was carefully worded and the emails may not even be significant. I guess I am catching that right.
It's a Republican thang: disregard the small print. Anything that doesn't slam Clinton is small print in their mind.and the emails may not even be significant.
Can, has and isYou couldn’t make it up!
I suppose details will remain sketchy as to the sensitivity of the emails. It's a talking heads game until an official announcement is made.Ok so a read that. Now rereading says it was carefully worded and the emails may not even be significant. I guess I am catching that right.