If Dems were behind the hit-piece of the OP, you'd have a point.Perhaps for the Reps, but the Dems would be all over it
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
FBI reopens investigation into HIllary's Server... and now what?
- Thread starter whirlingmerc
- Start date
-
- Tags
- hillary campaign
Which could then prove that Obama is the Anti-Christ King of Isis who eats babies.
Is Glenn Beck missing his chalkboard? I think I found it.
For more than one reason, I have little confidence that Sanders would have been more "electable" than Clinton. For instance, I'm not sure Sanders could have raised the money that Clinton has.
Notanumber
A Free Man
Donald must be like a dog with two tails, he’ll be Tweeting all night!
Mickdrew
Member
I don't think the donors would be rushing to Trump either.
True, Trump could give in some of his own money (as he's already doing), but Sanders managed to out raise Hilary in the primaries with just regular people donating. I'm sure there would be plenty more for him in the general election.
Agree.
He did?
Anyway, my opinion here is just a "feeling" kind of thing. I think lots of Americans are skeptical of praise of "socialism".
Mickdrew
Member
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016#Campaign_finance
Hilary Clinton: $212 Million
Bernie Sanders: $220 Million
I have a difficult time seeing how any uncorrupted non-sexual predator could have lost this election.
Wirey
Fartist
Comey's words from CBC:
"In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation," Comey wrote. "I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation."
Comey stressed in his letter that the FBI could not yet assess "whether or not this material may be significant," or how long it might take to run down the new investigative leads.
From the Dems:
"FBI director Comey should immediately provide the American public more information than is contained in the letter he sent to eight Republican committee chairmen," Podesta said.
I got $5 says she forwarded a picture of Weiner's dink.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/email-leak-clinton-1.3826265
"In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation," Comey wrote. "I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation."
Comey stressed in his letter that the FBI could not yet assess "whether or not this material may be significant," or how long it might take to run down the new investigative leads.
From the Dems:
"FBI director Comey should immediately provide the American public more information than is contained in the letter he sent to eight Republican committee chairmen," Podesta said.
I got $5 says she forwarded a picture of Weiner's dink.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/email-leak-clinton-1.3826265
I can only imagine that it is something that Abedin got from Clinton and forwarded or mentioned to Weiner.
BSM1
What? Me worry?
Perhaps, perhaps not. Not getting excited, have to wait and see what transpires. I believe Comey was under intense pressure to do this internally and had no choice. But, that pressure does come with the obvious reasons.
What damage, if any, it does to her campaign we will have to see. It will likely be downplayed as not a big deal. Could very well turn out the same as it did the first time. Out of our hands
'Internally' from whom? He's the head of the FBI and the Justice Department belongs to Obama.
That seems a jump huh?
Lighthouse
Well-Known Member
That's great news from a Republican perspective.
Yes, millions have voted. The mere investigation and all the stuff journalists normally try to do, plus the rumor mill, all that combined could impact the election.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
With this and the huge financial hit people are going to get from Obamacare, I'd say Trump is going to be our next President.
Mickdrew
Member
That might be overly optimistic.
FiveThirtyEight reasons that today's debacle might double Trump's chances of winning.
He'd still be the underdog 2:1
I don't see how Obamacare will have any drastic impact between now and election day.
There isn't anything being "reopened". Republicans just wish so badly for it to be about Hillary. Is about Weiners sexting. OMG I can't even type the guy's name without laughing.
Mickdrew
Member
xDD
Well, even if nothing comes out of this, what matters is public perception.
Everyone is going crazy and she looks more distrustful.
I know, I first thought holy cow was Hillary sexting. No turned out to be about some dude that already has been ostracized.