• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Federal Judge Blocks Florida Restrictive Voting Law

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
I'd like to post this under a thread that say "I told ya so!", but this will have to do.

A federal judge barred Florida from enforcing the bulk of its new restrictive voting law on Thursday, siding with opponents who said the law was discriminatory and needlessly infringed on Floridians' voting rights.

The ruling, which will likely be appealed, is the first major invalidation of a spate of restrictive new election laws passed in Republican-controlled states last year, fueled by voter fraud anxieties and President Donald Trump’s stolen election lie.

The Florida law, known as Senate Bill 90, added new restrictions on drop boxes, third-party voter registration, mail voting, and "line warming" activities like giving voters food and water while they wait in line to cast a ballot. It was challenged last May in federal court by voting rights advocates lead by the League of Women Voters of Florida.

In a stinging 288-page ruling, U.S. District Court Chief Judge Mark Walker declared the bulk of the state’s new voting rules unconstitutional and issued a permanent injunction barring their enforcement.

The plaintiffs “allege that SB 90 runs roughshod over the right to vote, unnecessarily making voting harder for all eligible Floridians, unduly burdening disabled voters, and intentionally targeting minority voters — all to improve the electoral prospects of the party in power,” Walker, who was nominated by former President Barack Obama, wrote. “Having reviewed all the evidence, this Court finds that, for the most part, Plaintiffs are right.”

Walker writes in his ruling that certain provisions of the law intentionally discriminated against Black voters — though he notes the plaintiffs were not able to prove intentional discrimination against Latino voters — and says that the law fundamentally was designed with partisan aims.

Federal judge blocks Florida restrictive voting law
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
The Florida law, known as Senate Bill 90, added new restrictions on drop boxes, third-party voter registration, mail voting, and "line warming" activities like giving voters food and water while they wait in line to cast a ballot. It was challenged last May in federal court by voting rights advocates lead by the League of Women Voters of Florida.
They're Conservatives. We need to go back to the good ole days when we got booze.
 

robocop (actually)

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
We should encourage legal voting as much as possible. Call me biased Democrat I don't care it's true. And there wasn't a whole lot of illegal voting in the last election. If so, why did all the court cases fail?
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
I'd like to post this under a thread that say "I told ya so!", but this will have to do.

A federal judge barred Florida from enforcing the bulk of its new restrictive voting law on Thursday, siding with opponents who said the law was discriminatory and needlessly infringed on Floridians' voting rights.

The ruling, which will likely be appealed, is the first major invalidation of a spate of restrictive new election laws passed in Republican-controlled states last year, fueled by voter fraud anxieties and President Donald Trump’s stolen election lie.

The Florida law, known as Senate Bill 90, added new restrictions on drop boxes, third-party voter registration, mail voting, and "line warming" activities like giving voters food and water while they wait in line to cast a ballot. It was challenged last May in federal court by voting rights advocates lead by the League of Women Voters of Florida.

In a stinging 288-page ruling, U.S. District Court Chief Judge Mark Walker declared the bulk of the state’s new voting rules unconstitutional and issued a permanent injunction barring their enforcement.

The plaintiffs “allege that SB 90 runs roughshod over the right to vote, unnecessarily making voting harder for all eligible Floridians, unduly burdening disabled voters, and intentionally targeting minority voters — all to improve the electoral prospects of the party in power,” Walker, who was nominated by former President Barack Obama, wrote. “Having reviewed all the evidence, this Court finds that, for the most part, Plaintiffs are right.”

Walker writes in his ruling that certain provisions of the law intentionally discriminated against Black voters — though he notes the plaintiffs were not able to prove intentional discrimination against Latino voters — and says that the law fundamentally was designed with partisan aims.

Federal judge blocks Florida restrictive voting law
Maybe it is time for the US to move to a Right to Vote, instead of a privilege.
 

esmith

Veteran Member
Florida Senate Bill 90
Voter registration[edit]
Provisions include:

  • Amending the regulations governing organizations and their volunteers who promote voter registration:
    • Clarifying that only volunteers who collect and handle registration applications need to be registered with the voting division, not volunteers who only solicit applications.[19]
    • Repealing the requirement for volunteers to undertake a sworn statement saying they will obey all state laws regarding voter registration.[19]
  • Amending requirements for voter registration organizations delivering of applications:
    • Requiring applications to be submitted to the county in which the applicant lives.[19]
    • Extending the delivery time requirement from 48 hours after the application was completed by the applicant to 14 days after.[19]
    • Laying out information that organizations must provide to applicants using their services.[20]
Voting by mail[edit]
Provisions included:

  • Making it a first degree misdemeanor to possess more than two vote-by-mail ballots, not including one's own and those of an immediate family member.[21]
  • Expanding the definition of "immediate family member" to include grandchildren.[22][note 2]
  • Expanding rules on making duplicates of damaged mail-in ballots during counting:
    • Requiring duplicates to be made in "an open and accessible room".[24]
    • Allowing duplicates of over or undervoted mail-in ballots only if there is a clear indication that the voter made a definite choice in that election or ballot measure.[25]
    • Allowing candidates, party officials or political committee officials to observe the duplication taking place, including the markings made on each ballot.[26]
    • Requiring duplication to happen in the presence of at least one canvassing board member.[26]
    • Allowing observers present to make objections to a duplication which, if reasonable, must be presented to the canvassing board which notes the serial number in its minutes and decides on its validity. If valid, it must be counted and if invalid, it must be replaced with another duplication.[27]
  • Allowing a single request to vote by mail to be sufficient to receive mail-in ballots for all elections until the end of the calendar year of the next regularly scheduled general election.[28]
  • Allowing requests for mail-in ballots submitted before the act comes into force to stand until the end of 2022.[29]
  • Reforming methods of requesting a mail-in ballot:
No-solicitation zones[edit]
No-solicitation zones are areas around polling stations where campaigning and political activities are restricted for the duration of an election. Under Florida law, anywhere within 150 feet (46 m) of a polling place, early voting site or election supervisor office is a no-solicitation zone.[31] SB 90 made provision for:

  • Drop box sites to be added to sites protected by no-solicitation zones
  • Expands the definition of solicitation to include any activity with the intent to or effect of influencing voters.

I don't see any problem with any of the above.
What's your complaint?????
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I'd like to post this under a thread that say "I told ya so!", but this will have to do.

A federal judge barred Florida from enforcing the bulk of its new restrictive voting law on Thursday, siding with opponents who said the law was discriminatory and needlessly infringed on Floridians' voting rights.

The ruling, which will likely be appealed, is the first major invalidation of a spate of restrictive new election laws passed in Republican-controlled states last year, fueled by voter fraud anxieties and President Donald Trump’s stolen election lie.

The Florida law, known as Senate Bill 90, added new restrictions on drop boxes, third-party voter registration, mail voting, and "line warming" activities like giving voters food and water while they wait in line to cast a ballot. It was challenged last May in federal court by voting rights advocates lead by the League of Women Voters of Florida.

In a stinging 288-page ruling, U.S. District Court Chief Judge Mark Walker declared the bulk of the state’s new voting rules unconstitutional and issued a permanent injunction barring their enforcement.

The plaintiffs “allege that SB 90 runs roughshod over the right to vote, unnecessarily making voting harder for all eligible Floridians, unduly burdening disabled voters, and intentionally targeting minority voters — all to improve the electoral prospects of the party in power,” Walker, who was nominated by former President Barack Obama, wrote. “Having reviewed all the evidence, this Court finds that, for the most part, Plaintiffs are right.”

Walker writes in his ruling that certain provisions of the law intentionally discriminated against Black voters — though he notes the plaintiffs were not able to prove intentional discrimination against Latino voters — and says that the law fundamentally was designed with partisan aims.

Federal judge blocks Florida restrictive voting law
Should have gone to a professional organization like ALEC, rather than winging it themselves. :rolleyes:

American Legislative Exchange Council - Wikipedia
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
Florida Senate Bill 90
Voter registration[edit]
Provisions include:

  • Amending the regulations governing organizations and their volunteers who promote voter registration:
    • Clarifying that only volunteers who collect and handle registration applications need to be registered with the voting division, not volunteers who only solicit applications.[19]
    • Repealing the requirement for volunteers to undertake a sworn statement saying they will obey all state laws regarding voter registration.[19]
  • Amending requirements for voter registration organizations delivering of applications:
    • Requiring applications to be submitted to the county in which the applicant lives.[19]
    • Extending the delivery time requirement from 48 hours after the application was completed by the applicant to 14 days after.[19]
    • Laying out information that organizations must provide to applicants using their services.[20]
Voting by mail[edit]
Provisions included:

  • Making it a first degree misdemeanor to possess more than two vote-by-mail ballots, not including one's own and those of an immediate family member.[21]
  • Expanding the definition of "immediate family member" to include grandchildren.[22][note 2]
  • Expanding rules on making duplicates of damaged mail-in ballots during counting:
    • Requiring duplicates to be made in "an open and accessible room".[24]
    • Allowing duplicates of over or undervoted mail-in ballots only if there is a clear indication that the voter made a definite choice in that election or ballot measure.[25]
    • Allowing candidates, party officials or political committee officials to observe the duplication taking place, including the markings made on each ballot.[26]
    • Requiring duplication to happen in the presence of at least one canvassing board member.[26]
    • Allowing observers present to make objections to a duplication which, if reasonable, must be presented to the canvassing board which notes the serial number in its minutes and decides on its validity. If valid, it must be counted and if invalid, it must be replaced with another duplication.[27]
  • Allowing a single request to vote by mail to be sufficient to receive mail-in ballots for all elections until the end of the calendar year of the next regularly scheduled general election.[28]
  • Allowing requests for mail-in ballots submitted before the act comes into force to stand until the end of 2022.[29]
  • Reforming methods of requesting a mail-in ballot:
No-solicitation zones[edit]
No-solicitation zones are areas around polling stations where campaigning and political activities are restricted for the duration of an election. Under Florida law, anywhere within 150 feet (46 m) of a polling place, early voting site or election supervisor office is a no-solicitation zone.[31] SB 90 made provision for:

  • Drop box sites to be added to sites protected by no-solicitation zones
  • Expands the definition of solicitation to include any activity with the intent to or effect of influencing voters.

I don't see any problem with any of the above.
What's your complaint?????
Why not read the ruling itself?

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21564733/ndfl-voting.pdf
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
https://www.freedominthe50states.org/

Of course you will predictably reject it.
From the Chas. Koch and CATO institutes, I see.

Well, I won't disappoint you.
This isn't the 'freedom' most of us are talking about. This is about the free market, about freedom from regulation.
It's about Neoliberal deregulation; the same small government, laissez-faire policies that brought us the great depression, outsourcingand the rust belt, the '08 economic crash, demise of labor unions, stagnant wages, a diminishing middle class, a shredded social safety net; unaffordable healthcare, housing and education, and widespread poverty and homelessness.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
From the Chas. Koch and CATO institutes, I see.

Well, I won't disappoint you.
This isn't the 'freedom' most of us are talking about. This is about the free market, about freedom from regulation.
It's about Neoliberal deregulation; the same small government, laissez-faire policies that brought us the great depression, outsourcingand the rust belt, the '08 economic crash, demise of labor unions, stagnant wages, a diminishing middle class, a shredded social safety net; unaffordable healthcare, housing and education, and widespread poverty and homelessness.
I like to think this can be accomplished without having people put in a regulatory and legislative cage.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I like to think this can be accomplished without having people put in a regulatory and legislative cage.
But it's not about "the people" or individual prosperity.The people are miserable. This is about the corporate deregulation and the 'freedom' that's caused the wealth to trickle up and has filled our cities with homeless camps and a beggar on every street corner.

Is this the freedom you support?
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Forum shopped to an Obama-appointed judge with an agenda. This legislation was crafted based on higher court rulings. This rogue judge’s opinion will not withstand appeal to higher courts.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Forum shopped to an Obama-appointed judge with an agenda. This legislation was crafted based on higher court rulings. This rogue judge’s opinion will not withstand appeal to higher courts.
You may be right, considering the supreme court packed with conservatives with an agenda. ;)

Me, I see this sort of legislation as a threat to democracy, by a party that knows its policies aren't supported by the majority of the public and that has to manufacture crises, fake news and suppress voters to remain in power.
 
Top