Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I disagree that leaning on wrong dogma does no harm.Exactly.... Though dogma does not define a person. A person might adhere to a dogma or not, but that confers nothing beneficial or harmful in itself.
Some churchess have no dogma... see the following...http://www.nspresbyterian.org/pages/faith.htm
This particular local Chuch was established in Comber by my family, and built by them on their land.
At the time the non subscribing Presbyterian church had an important presence in Northern Ireland, and was Unitarian in character.
I disagree that leaning on wrong dogma does no harm.
What a person believes is where a person is heading. Is this the truth?
Except that a person can't be "faithful" while believing against the truth, Jesus Christ. Is Jesus not the truth? The Bible says he is.In my opinion not so. If that were the case a majority of the faithful would fall outside God's love.
That is clearly not the case, as God's love is universal to everyone.
Of course not! But it is possible to be condemned by what you believe. Matthew 12:37No one is "saved" through what they believe.
Scepticism is a good thing imo.Though this puts the whole salvation theology in doubt.
I think you mean that you believe everyone will accept salvation. Opportunity and acceptance are two different things.I believe in a universal salvation. as we all have the opportunity to repent either in this world or the next.
I agree God has not created a place of torture for dead people.From that you will understand that I do not believe in a physical hell.
But this is all far from the OP.
I think you mean that you believe everyone will accept salvation. Opportunity and acceptance are two different things.
e.
You say there will be a universal salvation.if there is an offer of salvation there is a choice....however what could the alternative be?
I worry about the whole concept of salvation, or that it could be earned.
I prefer to think of it as returning to God, whatever that might entail.
Does it mean that everyone will be saved or can be saved?I believe in a universal salvation. as we all have the opportunity to repent either in this world or the next.
You say there will be a universal salvation.
Does it mean that everyone will be saved or can be saved?
I agree with you. Universal salvation I understand is that everyone will go happy with God. I do not believe that because then what good is law and love?I am sure salvation and saved are the wrong concepts, though i use the words out of convenience.
what do we need to be saved from?
certainly not from original sin?
we are responsible for our own sin.
instead of salvation...think of repentance forgiveness and returning to God.
every one who repents will do so, with their sins expunged.
perhaps those who refuse to repent, have an oportunity at a later time. Perhaps purgatory has some meaning?
I think that scripture is good for learning the language of the spirit. How can a person listen to it if he does not know what the words mean?
I agree with you. Universal salvation I understand is that everyone will go happy with God. I do not believe that because then what good is law and love?
What? You have switched the equation. I agree with you that love is for love's sake. OK?We are not supposed to love in expectation of a reward.
we should love because God loves us.
The law and Jesus examples are not to punish but to lead. We follow through love.
The Idea that we only do things through the fear of punishment. Is disproved even at a human level.
What? You have switched the equation. I agree with you that love is for love's sake. OK?
If everyone is saved the same way, then I do not have to obey the law if I do not want to and I will end up the same as those who struggle to love and obey.. Is that right?
If I do not work the will of God I will have the same reward as those who work hard for the Lord. Is that what you teach in your church?
Everything should end the same whether people obey God or not. ?
No. Not punishments. Is not knowing the will of God is accomplished a reward? What are the punishments? I think that to know the will of God has been accomplished is the reward. To be aware that it will not be accomplished is worse than death imo.some thinkers in the church have and do think this way. However it is not what the church teaches.
your questions show that you are still basing your thinking on rewards and punishments.
I do not live for the next life.put it another way...death and a return to God is inevitable.
however our role when we return, is not necessarily equal...some might have proved better suited in this life to one role than another in the next. What those roles might be are totally unknown. God may chose some to return and fulfill a different role.
I agree what God does is always appropriate."All shall be well, and all shall be well and all manner of thing shall be well.” Julian of Norwich.
In other words God's will will be done and it will be well.
I guess I should embarrass myself to since ancient Hebrew didn't have diacritical markers another addition from rabbinical Judaism. So you must be right.You are wrong.
Stop embarrassing yourself: go to any library and scan through ...
... or any comparable text.
Depends, if what is written was based on an invalid translation then it can be fixed. I will give you one example:
Isaiah 7:13
In most Christian bibles a passage reads: Therefore the LORD himself will give you a sign. The virgin (my emphases) will be with child.
In the Tanakh and The New Oxford Annotated Bible the word "virgin" is translated correctly to "young woman".
I don't believe there is any evidence to support this.
I believe I follow Jesus and that Paul is not a prophet and not false.
View attachment 15642
Verse 2:5 She'owl is the place of seperation from God. Sha'uwl is written and is interchangeable in Hebrew. They are the same word period.
Sha'uwl is Saul is Paul they are the same. Named by name as a warning. Habakkuk was written 666 years before Paul's gospel of grace.
Sha'uwl also means question him.
Note verse 6 "They do not question" , Do you question Paul? You should the church in Asia turned away from him, he said so himself. And in Rev 2:2 that church was commended for doing so.
2 Corinthians 12:7
Paul and his "corrective" demon, just like King Saul of the Old Testament and his demon.
Ravenous wolf of the tribe of Benjamin both of them fear Paul, his word can kill the soul.
Moses probably wrote some of the books of the Old Testament.
Jesus wrote nothing.
God was never an Author of books.
Moses probably wrote some of the books of the Old Testament.
Jesus wrote nothing.
God was never an Author of books.