• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Flight Shaming....I Like It !!

PruePhillip

Well-Known Member
In the news....
Flight shaming hits air travel as 'Greta effect' takes off
Perhaps I can use this to avoid vacations which require flying.

On to a better issue to discuss....
What's reasonable to do for those of us who want to treat our environment better?

And of course, let's not forget
consumer shaming,
Capitalist shaming
Judaeo Christianity shaming
scientific method shaming
heterosexual shaming
morality shaming
military shaming
profit shaming
white shaming
Western society shaming

and let's fight to ban bridges, roads, airports, fisheries, timber, oil, gas, mining, fur,
meat, vaccines, GM, horse racing, pet ownership, national borders etc..

You give in to one thing and before you know the next issue is presented for you
to accept. The issue isn't really what is presented, the issue is you.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
And of course, let's not forget
consumer shaming,
Capitalist shaming
Judaeo Christianity shaming
scientific method shaming
heterosexual shaming
morality shaming
military shaming
profit shaming
white shaming
Western society shaming

and let's fight to ban bridges, roads, airports, fisheries, timber, oil, gas, mining, fur,
meat, vaccines, GM, horse racing, pet ownership, national borders etc..

You give in to one thing and before you know the next issue is presented for you
to accept. The issue isn't really what is presented, the issue is you.
I prefer shaming things which do harm.
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
On to a better issue to discuss....
What's reasonable to do for those of us who want to treat our environment better?
  • Stop using air shipping and bubblewrap. That means no more Amazon.
  • Move out of the country into a city where you can live without an automobile
  • Give up plastic and metal. Live with cotton, wool, wood and wax. These are sufficient.
  • Own a goat. Feed it city food. It will trim your lawn, your hedges, help recycle your waste.
  • Instead of air conditioning use silk furniture, water-misters and weight driven ceiling fans.
  • In winter huddle for warmth. Mammals have done for hundreds of thousands of years, including humans since whenever we appeared. Its ridiculous to claim otherwise. Its fact.
  • Cease accessing the cloud. It is an energy hog using more power than airlines. This an undeniable fact.
  • solar calculators are great, but don't encourage new production. Buy used.
  • Bread is an energy intensive food. Opt for fresh fruits and nuts, instead.
  • Use solar heating to warm soups. Don't burn coal just to heat your beans.
  • Semaphore uses no coal, so encourage its use.
  • There are numerous other ways that society today is in denial about.
 

PruePhillip

Well-Known Member
I prefer shaming things which do harm.

You can argue (as you must) that anything your political opponent believes in will harm you.
My mother believed that all mining should be banned. She could muster a good argument
to the effect that mining is harmful (environment, injury, industrialization etc..)
 
Last edited:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
You can argue (as you must) that anything your political opponent believes in will hard you.
I can.
But I'm not.
My mother believed that all mining should be banned. She could muster a good argument
to the effect that mining is harmful (environment, injury, industrialization etc..)
One could advocate returning to a pre-industrial lifestyle.
I'm not going that far.

But I recommend against buying this car, & against driving this way.
 

PruePhillip

Well-Known Member
Stop eating meat, or things that required an animal to be involved (eggs, milk,.....). And yes; fish, lobster, shrimp, etc....are all meat.

Stop eating, period.
Grain, fruit, legumes etc require huge acreages - land that once belonged to non-humans.
Stop eating, stop breeding, lay down and die - and hand the land over to the feral cats,
dogs and weeds.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Stop eating, period.
Grain, fruit, legumes etc require huge acreages - land that once belonged to non-humans.
Stop eating, stop breeding, lay down and die - and hand the land over to the feral cats,
dogs and weeds.
I respect your personal choice.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Stop eating, period.
Grain, fruit, legumes etc require huge acreages - land that once belonged to non-humans.
Stop eating, stop breeding, lay down and die - and hand the land over to the feral cats,
dogs and weeds.

The best policy is always to go to the greatest
extreme one can think of, no?

To hell with that Greek "golden mean" stuff.
You see where it got them.
 

PruePhillip

Well-Known Member
The best policy is always to go to the greatest
extreme one can think of, no?

To hell with that Greek "golden mean" stuff.
You see where it got them.

Yes, it's called "race to the bottom."

If the status quo is wind power then people will start
asking how many birds and bats get killed, how real
is infra-sound on people's health, how many terrawatts
of energy are being taken out of the world's winds,
how much infrastructure of the turbines is blotting
our scenery and so on.

People who go on about transgender toilets, gay
marriage, nuclear disarmament etc are often not
that interested in the issues - they often admit as
much, and show surprising ignorance of the issues
and their consequences - it's this deeper hate they
tap into. The general public just buy the issue.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Yes, it's called "race to the bottom."

If the status quo is wind power then people will start
asking how many birds and bats get killed, how real
is infra-sound on people's health, how many terrawatts
of energy are being taken out of the world's winds,
how much infrastructure of the turbines is blotting
our scenery and so on.

People who go on about transgender toilets, gay
marriage, nuclear disarmament etc are often not
that interested in the issues - they often admit as
much, and show surprising ignorance of the issues
and their consequences - it's this deeper hate they
tap into. The general public just buy the issue.

Well, yes, your extreme statement sort of fits
with "race to the bottom" but
"(insert adjective) satire" would be closer to it.

As for the rest of what you say, I suppose it
represents what a few people would say or do.
There is nothing you or I can think of that someone
wont do.
I dont get the relevance tho..?
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
That whole "drifting" thing looks really hard on tires.
It's so wasteful. I treat my tires gently in order to
safely get the most life possible out of them.

Moi aussi (me also). I rely on them to keep the cars right side up so look after them - i used to do circuit trials, thats a different thing.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Stop eating, period.
Grain, fruit, legumes etc require huge acreages - land that once belonged to non-humans.
Stop eating, stop breeding, lay down and die - and hand the land over to the feral cats,
dogs and weeds.

After you
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
In the news....
Flight shaming hits air travel as 'Greta effect' takes off
Perhaps I can use this to avoid vacations which require flying.

On to a better issue to discuss....
What's reasonable to do for those of us who want to treat our environment better?

I thought "flight shaming" was about unruly passengers who ruin the flight for everyone else. And I've seen a lot of complaints about bad service and unfriendly personnel. I've seen it myself. These airlines suck in general, so if people stop flying on them, I like it too.

The only problem is, Greyhound sucks too, and so does Amtrak. I prefer driving my own vehicle.

I remember seeing a sci-fi pilot (created by Gene Roddenberry) about a post-apocalyptic Earth which still had operating "sub-shuttles," which were underground, high-speed trains which went all over the world - as fast as planes or even faster.

The best thing we can do for our environment is to encourage negative population growth for a few generations and get the global population down to more reasonable numbers - under a billion, if possible. The main problem isn't consumption itself, but the number of people doing it.
 

PruePhillip

Well-Known Member
Well, yes, your extreme statement sort of fits
with "race to the bottom" but
"(insert adjective) satire" would be closer to it.

As for the rest of what you say, I suppose it
represents what a few people would say or do.
There is nothing you or I can think of that someone
wont do.
I dont get the relevance tho..?

The relevance is that we must be ashamed of ourselves.
Not just airplanes or white supremacy or Imperialism or
anything in particular - just ourselves.

In Plato's Republic there would be no poets. Why?
Because poets (like screen writers, authors, activists)
are persuasive. Not truthful, honest etc but persuasive.
The poet would have you believe it's grand to live in a
cave.
... and ban airplanes, cars, roads, factories, vaccines.....

ps Plato wanted his ideal city to be governed by Philosopher
Kings. I wonder if our activists see themselves as having that
divine right to rule others?
 
Top