Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
That was my other answer. Science should be required to learn the basics of science.Basic physics.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That was my other answer. Science should be required to learn the basics of science.Basic physics.
So despite me countering every single point...you claim I did a straw man, didn't reference the straw man and now are claiming that I ignored something, but didn't indicate what. My credibility isn't the one that's lacking here, especially since I responded to all of your points in great detail and you can't even bother to back up your claim that I created a strawman, or apparently some other thing I ignored from another post. The fact that you didn't reply to my actual post...at all...counter any points at all....and claimed I did something wrong, but didn't say what....shows your integrity is lacking. At this point you are just doing ad hominem, which means you've lost.
That would indicate a huge conspiracy and one in which all archaeologists around the world, both past and present are participating in.
You are making sweeping generalizations….
“All archaeologists around the world”?…. No.
Actually, I said all of "Archaeology" around the world, not (all Archaeologists),
Wow! I’m so impressed!Basic physics.
PLI, you said “all archaeologists in the world”…(I think you said it twice, actually)…. That means “every single archaeologist” !Well. at least you made it clear this time what you found a problem with. But it's hilarious that you are misrepresenting my words as basically "Every single archaeologist that's ever existed". Anyone reading my statement, combined with my first reference to the field of archaeology can plainly see that I'm referencing all archaeologists worldwide, both past and present, that came to the conclusion that these civilizations existed prior to your flood date and existed after. I shouldn't have to clarify this for you, but given how you've approached this, it's becoming clear what kind of person I'm dealing with, in that you strawman'd my argument. You've ignored my actual points, not rebutted anything, claimed to be a victim of an insult and now claim that I was referring to every single archaeologist that's ever existed, even though in my prior post, I explained that wasn't the case. So...are you going to start being honest? I though you christians were big on "thou shall not lie"? Or is that like everything in the bible and you cherry pick?
And when arrogance manifests itself, usually narrow-mindedness is not far behind.One cannot demand evidence when one does not understand the concept.
Yes, that is a problem with creationists and flood believers. One has to be very arrogant to ignore reality.And when arrogance manifests itself, usually narrow-mindedness is not far behind.
Let's add basic physics to the science that you do not understand.Wow! I’m so impressed!
How??!
Since the Event cooled the Earth’s atmosphere, more so especially in the extreme northern & southern latitudes where the fresh water froze creating the existing permafrost , encasing all those animals within it (not ‘on top’ of the surface — within it) thereby causing the last Ice Age!
Talk about ignoring evidence.
This statement, alone, reveals you simply either can’t comprehend or willfully misrepresent a perspective I’ve posited here, and on which you’ve been engaging me, for close to 3 years - Oct 17, ‘18 .You need five vertical miles for your myth.
You are the one that will not come up with a testable model. As a result we have to rely on reality to help you to make one. Mt Everest is older than humanity. How are you going to flood the Earth if you do not cover it?This statement, alone, reveals you simply either can’t comprehend or willfully misrepresent a perspective I’ve posited here, and on which you’ve been engaging me, for close to 3 years - Oct 17, ‘18 .
Simply incredible!
Proverbs 18:13 He who answers a matter before he hears it--this is folly and disgrace to him.
LOL! Yes, it does. Do you seriously think that it started out as a lone peak? Look at the sedimentary strata. It started out as part of a flat plane. The plate that the sediments were lying on was uplifted as a result of the collision between the Indian subcontinent and the rest off Asia. It took millions of years to erode away the vast majority of those sediments. The peaks are all that are left.You know, SZ, I’m gonna teach you something.
Part of science, a big part, is observation. So make an observation. Does Everest look like it’s experienced millions of years of extreme weathering and erosion? No, we don’t see that all.
What do we observe? We see well-defined features! Sharp.
Heavy erosion is what we’d expect from millions of years of weathering in its extreme cold and windy environment. This is not seen.
Oh, the rocks of the Himalayas are old , millions of years no doubt. But the mountains they form, with accompanying features? It’s young, geologically speaking.
Easy to see.
Thanks for verifying the observation, I didn’t think you’d do it.LOL! Yes, it does. Do you seriously think that it started out as a lone peak? Look at the sedimentary strata. It started out as part of a flat plane. The plate that the sediments were lying on was uplifted as a result of the collision between the Indian subcontinent and the rest off Asia. It took millions of years to erode away the vast majority of those sediments. The peaks are all that are left.
When you try to ask serious questions you only make it worse for yourself. Once again, to even have evidence the first thing that you need is a testable model. Until then all you have is handwaving and special pleading.
My observations are "verified" yours are not. You really should try to learn the scientific method. I can help you with that. We can shelve this discussion for a while until you understand the scientific method and scientific evidence.Thanks for verifying the observation, I didn’t think you’d do it.
Wow! I’m so impressed!
How??!
Since the Event cooled the Earth’s atmosphere, more so especially in the extreme northern & southern latitudes where the fresh water froze creating the existing permafrost , encasing all those animals within it (not ‘on top’ of the surface — within it) thereby causing the last Ice Age!
Talk about ignoring evidence.
PLI, you said “all archaeologists in the world”…(I think you said it twice, actually)…. That means “every single archaeologist” !
I don't think that he ever will, but let's see if he takes me up on the offer to learn what qualifies as evidence, and understanding the scientific method. He has keeps falsely claiming that others are ignoring the evidence when there is none for his beliefs.
@Subduction Zone has explained that to you countless times already.
The last ice age started some 2.5 million years ago.
Humans as we know them today wouldn't even be around for another 2.3 million years.
Thanks for verifying the observation, I didn’t think you’d do it.
Classic case of pigeon chessI don't think that he ever will, but let's see if he takes me up on the offer to learn what qualifies as evidence, and understanding the scientific method. He has keeps falsely claiming that others are ignoring the evidence when there is none for his beliefs.