Flood Evidences — revised

[Audie]

Some journalist used the term in a popular article.

I'm not even sure of the relevance of their level of preservation in the context of the flood. Do mythical floods suspend decomposition?

So much better to let someone else make
up things and repeat them, eh

 

[shunyadragon]

You have a freezer, right?
Does it “suspend decomposition “?

If there was a vapor canopy extending over the Earth, what would that mean for much of the Earth’s climate? A greenhouse effect, maybe? And if it did exist, what effect would this have on Carbon dating?

What would happen if all of that water was released suddenly?

I appreciate your willingness to reason on the subject. You seem to be the only one here….most of the others that have replied, just try to belittle these concepts, except for maybe @KWED . Maybe he’s open minded, I’ll find out.

The problem is there is not evidence that this has ever happened, Local and regional catastrophic events (with local regional causes) that happened at different times in geologic history are not evidence of a world flood. Points 3 and 5 are the most are simply physically impossible based simple Physics.

There is not enough water on nor in the earth to account for the water needed for the flood.

 

[KWED]

(How deep do you think?) Did you read the OP? If so, you read the 5th bullet point. That should answer your question. Also related are bullet points 6 & 7.

Take care.

So just to be clear, you are claiming that all the mountain ranges on the planet are no more than a few thousand years old?

 

[shunyadragon]

So just to be clear, you are claiming that all the mountain ranges on the planet are no more than a few thousand years old?

Deuteronomy 33:16 with the best of the ancient mountains and the bounty of the everlasting hills,

 

[Audie]

So just to be clear, you are claiming that all the mountain ranges on the planet are no more than a few thousand years old?

He cites as proof that high
mountains have all manner of high peaks, and
sharp ridges; for lo, erosion only gives smooth
rounded features.

Examples, demonstrations that this is not so
will receive no response. Try it!

He is back to that silly clain about how the
fossil clams were all alive when buried in the 'flood', proved by shells being closed.

Anyone who ever dug clams knows most of the one you dig up are long dead and full of sand. Closed. But of course not this or any other tiny insignificant error will ever be admitted.
Try mentioning that error.

 

[Audie]

Deuteronomy 33:16 with the best of the ancient mountains and the bounty of the everlasting hills,

Which hills are the everlasting one?

 

[Audie]

You have a freezer, right?
Does it “suspend decomposition “?

If there was a vapor canopy extending over the Earth, what would that mean for much of the Earth’s climate? A greenhouse effect, maybe? And if it did exist, what effect would this have on Carbon dating?

What would happen if all of that water was released suddenly?

I appreciate your willingness to reason on the subject. You seem to be the only one here….most of the others that have replied, just try to belittle these concepts, except for maybe @KWED . Maybe he’s open minded, I’ll find out.

We note that people who post wild theories
always find the fault is in those who respond.
Not open minded
Rude
Condescending
Belittling.
Unreasonable

So to be ignored.

It's cute. Gives the moral and intellectual high ground, and rescues the theorist from having ever admit to even the tiniest error.

 

[Sheldon]

You have a freezer, right?
Does it “suspend decomposition “?

I thought the creationist blog you cited, was asserting a mythical global flood was the only plausible explanation? Now apparently they froze??

 

[Audie]

I thought the creationist blog you cited, was asserting a mythical global flood was the only plausible explanation? Now apparently they froze??

Shoot n scoot involves never really engaging

 

[shunyadragon]

Which hills are the everlasting one?

Based on the citation all hills are everlasting...

 

[Audie]

Based on the citation all hills are everlasting...

It's ambiguous. As usual it means whatever one chooses.

 

[shunyadragon]

It's ambiguous. As usual it means whatever one chooses.

Nothing ambiguous here. Literally, no question, the hills are eternal

 

[Hockeycowboy]

So just to be clear, you are claiming that all the mountain ranges on the planet are no more than a few thousand years old?

No, not all. Some are very old, no doubt existing millions of years before the Flood. From observation, it’s obvious: either very rounded due to weathering and other forces, such as the Smokey’s, or extremely eroded, like a few of the Argentine Andies. They look very different (much older), though, from the majority of the Rockies or Himalayas.

 

[Hockeycowboy]

Not open minded
Rude
Condescending
Belittling.
Unreasonable

That’s you, Audie; not me. You throw around the (subtle) Ad Homs, not me.

I wish you a good day.

 

[Hockeycowboy]

So just to be clear, you are claiming that all the mountain ranges on the planet are no more than a few thousand years old?

“A few thousand years old”? Nope. If you’d read the post, you would have read where I said ‘the rocks are old.’ Or similar.

One more time (hope it’s the last): I’m not a YEC.
Grief!

 

[Subduction Zone]

You have a freezer, right?
Does it “suspend decomposition “?

If there was a vapor canopy extending over the Earth, what would that mean for much of the Earth’s climate? A greenhouse effect, maybe? And if it did exist, what effect would this have on Carbon dating?

What would happen if all of that water was released suddenly?

I appreciate your willingness to reason on the subject. You seem to be the only one here….most of the others that have replied, just try to belittle these concepts, except for maybe @KWED . Maybe he’s open minded, I’ll find out.

A "vapor canopy" is one of the most hilarious of all handwaving claims of flood believers. Perhaps you are conflating carbon dating with radiometric dating in general. It would have no effect on any of the long term dating methods. And if the "vapor canopy" had all of the thousands of feet of water necessary to flood the Earth none of the current land life forms would have been able to survive. Most oceanic species of fish would not likely be able to survive either. It is pure scientific ignorance that leads to such proposals by believers in the magic god boat.

 

[Subduction Zone]

That’s you, Audie; not me. You throw around the (subtle) Ad Homs, not me.

I wish you a good day.

Truly it is not. Corrections are not ad homs. What ad homs did she use? Facts are not ad homs either.

 

[Subduction Zone]

“A few thousand years old”? Nope. If you’d read the post, you would have read where I said ‘the rocks are old.’ Or similar.

One more time (hope it’s the last): I’m not a YEC.
Grief!

Wait a second. didn't you earlier try to claim that the mountain ranges formed during the flood?

By the way, why is there zero, nada, zilch, bupkis when it comes to geological evidence for the Flood? It would have left massive evidence behind.

 

[Audie]

Based on the citation all hills are everlasting...

What bounty is to be had from barren desert hills?
Could be that only bounty- hills is made of permanite

 

[Audie]

That’s you, Audie; not me. You throw around the (subtle) Ad Homs, not me.

I wish you a good day.

Terrif.Toss a stink- bomb false accusation
Then run away

You provide such a target rich environment
for anyone who wants to identify the falsehoods and nonsense you peddle.
Who would need to stoop to ad hom?