Stanyon
WWMRD?
You know damn well.
Actually I don't, could you fill me in?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You know damn well.
But we do have new investigations in multiple jurisdictions.
As you well know, conservatives were constantly screeching and squealing about locking Clinton up during the campaign.Actually I don't, could you fill me in?
As you well know, Conservatives were constantly screeching and squealing that about Clinton during the campaign.
I gave you a frubal because obviously you meant the OP was being a snotty bimbelkiester.Your descriptor is unnecessary.
I expected this, whether the Mueller report vindicated or failed anti-Trumpers.But we do have new investigations in multiple jurisdictions.
Any proof or evidence that this has been tampered with?
Of course he does, but what did you expect? Consistency? Treating others the same way he demands to be treated? What are you, new?You know damn well.
Mueller was honest and objective?Because an honest, objective approach is detrimental to his ideology and narrative.
Attorney General William Barr released a redacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller's report.
Definition of redact
-to select or adapt (as by obscuring or removing sensitive information) for publication or releasebroadly: edit.
-to obscure or remove (text) from a document prior to publication or release.
If you watch the news, you know that Mueller wasn't going to indict anyoneNor did we have any new indictments
Exactly, which is why there's multiple investigations going on right now.A little thing about the Constitution and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty
Trump is innocent when it comes to criminal charges. Investigation was about the Trump campaign, not Trump himself.]would it kill you to say Trump is innocent until further notice?
Of course, but that's not the version linked in the OP, so what's your point?
Best whodunnit ever! Maybe Mueller is the real "Mr. Big" and he has been working for Russia all along, by doing so he caused more division thus undermining our democracy.
Of course he does, but what did you expect? Consistency? Treating others the same way he demands to be treated? What are you, new?
Mueller and his cronies are indeed sly, evil people. They twisted the words and deeds of at least seven Trump insiders to make them look so guilty that most just admitted being guilty.
For those who do not know me, yes, the above is sarcasm.
Nope. Just the seven old Trump insider indictments accompanied by guilty pleas.Nor did we have any new indictments
If you don't think he was honest and objective, you can quote from his report to show where he was not honest and objective.Mueller was honest and objective?
Mueller was honest and objective?
The original isn't in the OP is my point. Few have seen the original and that's why the Dems are throwing a fit trying to get the original.
In that he never pursued the false representation of the Dossier to the courts is evidence enough no matter what he wrote.If you don't think he was honest and objective, you can quote from his report to show where he was not honest and objective.
We will all be waiting.