If he did, he would have pursued all lies no matter who did it. In that he didn't, he didn't do his job
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
For the Trump supporter who can't read...
- Thread starter Kangaroo Feathers
- Start date
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
okay, which lies did he not pursue?
The FBI knew the dossier was a fake and lied to the courts to get permission to listen in on conversations.
How do you find each indictment significant relative to Trump's conduct?
I ask because I've seen others cite the fact, but never explain how it
relates to Trump's guilt of any of the charges. I'm sure it isn't merely
to create an impression of guilt by association.
What you might be missing is that regardless of whether or not Trump was involved in the original crimes, he tried to obstruct justice after the fact. By trying to interfere with the Mueller probe he was not just obstructing his own case, but all these other cases as well.
That makes Trump’s conduct significant.
Why do you think I'm missing it, when I haven't even addressed it yet?
I'm addressing the claim that prosecutions of Trump underlings
& associates shows his guilt.
I've asked how it relates to Trump's guilt of any of the charges.
No answer forthcoming yet.
You've quoted my post #44, & voiced some objections,
but not to anything I'm addressing.
If you respond to that post, why not address it?
Because you hadn't addressed it yet.
I am not sure I understand the point you are making, but it seems trivial compared to the central idea that the President of the United States obstructed Justice. He tried to prevent all of these serious crimes from being prosecuted. Tried to protect the Russians and conceal their interference in the U.S. election.
So what is your point again?
ecco
Veteran Member
What "false representation of the Dossier to the courts"? Please be specific.
ecco
Veteran Member
Are you suggesting that he should have followed up and reported on the over one thousand lies that President Trump told?
Yeah. That would have been good.
That seems a pretty lame attempt to wring disagreement where there is none.
The part of the post which you didn't address.
You took issue with my post #44 to someone else.
Why object without answering it?
For your convenience, here is post #44 again (the one you only partially responded to).
It's the question I asked of another poster...
"How do you find each indictment significant relative to Trump's conduct?
I ask because I've seen others cite the fact, but never explain how it
relates to Trump's guilt of any of the charges. I'm sure it isn't merely
to create an impression of guilt by association."
Last edited:
Like I said... one sided.
Let me see if I understand you correctly... are you saying that the FBI and the Democratic party did NOTHING wrong in reference to the Dossier and the FISA requests?
Just want to make sure I am understanding you correctly and see if you are understanding me correctly,.
Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
When you're done projecting, maybe if you ask me a direct question, I'll answer it.
ecco
Veteran Member
Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
Fun watching them squirm, though, isn't it?
Like I expected, one sided which is why I asked the question.
Last edited:
ecco
Veteran Member
Why are you having a problem understanding a straight forward question?
You said:
he {Mueller} never pursued the false representation of the Dossier
I asked to specify:
What "false representation of the Dossier to the courts"? Please be specific.
Why are you having a problem understanding and responding appropriately to a straight forward question?
At this point - dodge count = 1
Stanyon
WWMRD?
I did, and you avoided it
Salvador
RF's Swedenborgian
The report available to me is redacted for legitimate legal reasons; therefore, I'll trust the opinion of the AG who has read the non-redacted report and William Barr knows more than just about anybody else what the entire Mueller investigation has concluded.
Salvador
RF's Swedenborgian
I don't bother watching fake news; I only trust real objective news sources like Fox News or Breitbart.