I made a mistake saying left to right. You are correct.
Not only that but THERE IS NOTHING WRONG with making a genuine attempt to pronounce the NAME of God … a reverent approach is not unGodly.
What do you say about the NAME of the human Son of God: Jesus?
IT IS NOT ‘JEE-ZUS’ is it???
What? You didn’t know?????? Oh boy!!!!
It is, in fact, more like ‘YESHUA’!!!
Which is then Anglasized to ‘JOSHUA’!!!
And
Greek-ised to ‘IESUS’
And finally to ‘JESUS’
So, if ‘Jesus’, if ‘Yeshua’ is almighty God… then isn’t the NAME of God as the Son being blasphemed???
Of course, it’s a nonsense, which is why no one ever claimed a blasphemy in mispronouncing the NAME of the Son of God…. Since the Son of God IS NOT GOD!!! (Reality and truth: 101…!)
The end of the debate is that by REFUSING to ACKNOWLEDGE the NAME of the one true God, as most TRINITARIANS seems to say, this then allows for blasphemies to occur and also the diminishing of God’s statement to mankind:
- ‘This is my NAME for ALL ETERNITY’
So it doesn’t matter if you cannot pronounce it CORRECTLY (who speaks HEBREW these days?) as long as an attempt is made IN REVERENCE to God. Moreover, a SUPPORTED interpretation CAN BE AGREED - which is why interpretations such as:
are perfectly VALID.
How many people have names that are pronounced DIFFERENTLY in different accents and languages… WHO IS OFFENDED by one or another if the speaker makes full attempt or speaks it reverently?
Almighty God used his name constantly (according to the Old Testament / Torah). Why do so many REFUSE to use it today…
(I know why but that’s for another debate!!)