• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

For Trump, size clearly matters; reality, not so much

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
That is a cheap and shameful evasion. You are trying to evade reality. The fact that a court case is moving slowly is not an excuse for ignoring the facts.
As with previous situations with those in authority in previous administrations, the statements have always been “Let’s wait and see what the courts do”. I don’t understand why people get so riled up.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
As with previous situations with those in authority in previous administrations, the statements have always been “Let’s wait and see what the courts do”. I don’t understand why people get so riled up.
um, I don't know how closely you are following the news, but did you know there is an election coming up?

You don't know why people get riled up because someone tried to overturn the government? Really? You don't think that is worth getting riled up about?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
As do yours.
I asked first.
You refused.
So any questions you have deserve no answers.
Typical Maga....uncomfortable about supporting
a treasonous rapey felon. I've no problem criticizing
both Harris & Trump. But such fear in admitting
Trump's wrongdoing inspires twisting the knife.
Magas....no integrity or courage of conviction.
 
Last edited:

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
um, I don't know how closely you are following the news, but did you know there is an election coming up?

You don't know why people get riled up because someone tried to overturn the government? Really? You don't think that is worth getting riled up about?
Absolutely, I just see that the reason that so many high-profiled Dems are leaving their party because it is actually those in auhtority in that party that is trying to overturn the government and make it more of a Socialist/Communist country.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
I asked first.
You refused.
So any questions you have deserve no answers.
Typical Maga....uncomfortable about supporting
a treasonous rapey felon. I've no problem criticizing
both Harris & Trump. But such fear in admitting
Trump's wrongdoing inspires twisting the knife.
Magas....no integrity or courage of conviction.
Oh… I did answer, but you just didn’t want to see the answer that was plainly there
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Absolutely, I just see that the reason that so many high-profiled Dems are leaving their party because it is actually those in auhtority in that party that is trying to overturn the government and make it more of a Socialist/Communist country.
I think that you have that backwards. I think that you guys have a conspiracy theories or two. We have most of the people that ever worked with Trump. An amazingly high number of ex-aides and other White House workers have identified Harris. That has never happened anywhere close to this level in the past. There have been some people that leave and hold a grudge, but endorsing the opposing candidate is almost unheard of. And that is just his ex-employees. There are still a few honest Republicans out there that can see the threat that Trump is and his terrible incompetence and are supporting Harris for this race.
 

Tomef

Well-Known Member
Absolutely, I just see that the reason that so many high-profiled Dems are leaving their party because it is actually those in auhtority in that party that is trying to overturn the government and make it more of a Socialist/Communist country.
Come on, man, how can you just swallow this nonsense? It's the same crap Hitler used in the '30s. He convinced much of the German public there was a Jewish communist plot to take over the world, and that all the problems they faced were the fault of these international Jewish communists. Doesn't it astonish you that someone can just do the same thing over again? The goal may be different, but the rhetoric is the same. Do yourself a favour, you're old enough to step back a few paces and take a mature look at the world. Staying buried in the same circles of nonsense Fox and the like churn out over there is just cowardly.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
I think that you have that backwards. I think that you guys have a conspiracy theories or two. We have most of the people that ever worked with Trump. An amazingly high number of ex-aides and other White House workers have identified Harris. That has never happened anywhere close to this level in the past. There have been some people that leave and hold a grudge, but endorsing the opposing candidate is almost unheard of. And that is just his ex-employees. There are still a few honest Republicans out there that can see the threat that Trump is and his terrible incompetence and are supporting Harris for this race.
No… I think the fact that Dems leaving their party saying “The Democratic Party has left us” - along with documented efforts says otherwise
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Come on, man, how can you just swallow this nonsense?

Is it really? Or is it I am using the logical process in thinking!.

Their effort to take off Senate filibuster option to protect the minority by changing the rules using the nuclear option.

Packing the Court to change the direction of the Country:


Not to mention trying to get non-citizens to vote:


These are all utensils, as you say, “the crap Hitler used”…

No conspiracy, just hard facts of why Democrats have said, “The Democratic Party has left me”.
 

Tomef

Well-Known Member
Is it really? Or is it I am using the logical process in thinking!.

Their effort to take off Senate filibuster option to protect the minority by changing the rules using the nuclear option.

Packing the Court to change the direction of the Country:


Not to mention trying to get non-citizens to vote:


These are all utensils, as you say, “the crap Hitler used”…

No conspiracy, just hard facts of why Democrats have said, “The Democratic Party has left me”.
You're proving my point - picking out fine details, read in a particular way, because you think they prove your point. They don't. This isn't a 'what about this particular thing and what I think it means'. You need a total rethink, a broader perspective, an understanding of what is actually going on over there. Paxton's anatomy of fascism could be a good place to start. At a minimum, that could provide you with a better understanding of what you are supporting, and what it can lead to. Beyond that, switch your news sources. Fox and the like are just dopamine stimulators, useless if you want any understanding of the real world. Reading widely from sources you have been trained to dislike over a period of time might aggravate you at first but if you can work through that you'll come out of it better informed.
 

Tomef

Well-Known Member
Is it really? Or is it I am using the logical process in thinking!.

Their effort to take off Senate filibuster option to protect the minority by changing the rules using the nuclear option.

Packing the Court to change the direction of the Country:


Not to mention trying to get non-citizens to vote:


These are all utensils, as you say, “the crap Hitler used”…

No conspiracy, just hard facts of why Democrats have said, “The Democratic Party has left me”.
Please explain the thought process that leads you from what you’ve quoted here to a ‘socialist/communist’ country. What do you actually mean? Please be specific in explaining the links and what you think these mean.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Their effort to take off Senate filibuster option to protect the minority by changing the rules using the nuclear option.
In 2017, Trump opposed the filibuster.
He flip flopped in 2021 when it suited him.
Do you know which position he'll take if he wins?
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
You're proving my point - picking out fine details, read in a particular way, because you think they prove your point. They don't. This isn't a 'what about this particular thing and what I think it means'. You need a total rethink, a broader perspective, an understanding of what is actually going on over there. Paxton's anatomy of fascism could be a good place to start. At a minimum, that could provide you with a better understanding of what you are supporting, and what it can lead to. Beyond that, switch your news sources. Fox and the like are just dopamine stimulators, useless if you want any understanding of the real world. Reading widely from sources you have been trained to dislike over a period of time might aggravate you at first but if you can work through that you'll come out of it better informed.

I think you are proving my point. This ends up being a political advertisement. Using the phrase “change your news source” (I just picked one just because I knew that the facts were true - not looking for a news source that satisfies your vetting) - when the details can be found anywhere means that you really aren’t interested in facts. Conspiracy theorist?
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Do you mean as Trump did when in office,
ie, packing it with anti-abortion justices?
1) This statement is used always when one can’t deny what I said was true
2) The current court has had things go to the liberal side, the conservative side with a once in a while completely in agreement on all sides 9/0 rulings… This sounds like a well balance court - it just doesn’t fit your narrative.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
....you really aren’t interested in facts. Conspiracy theorist?
giphy.gif
 
Top