Tumah
Veteran Member
Are you saying ones incentive to keep the law is irrelevant?
Not at all. Just that the wrong intention doesn't necessarily negate the requirement to fulfill the Law.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Are you saying ones incentive to keep the law is irrelevant?
....
The purpose of the laws of the Torah is to get closer to G-D.
And often actions are better than beliefs. Actions often frame beliefs.
Giving money to the poor has more merit (despite the reason) than just believing in giving money to the poor and not doing it.
Not speaking gossip (regardless of why) is more power than believing in not speaking in gossip and doing it anyway.
...
The purpose of jewish law is to get closer to G-D.
The law of Moses had to end with the coming of the Messiah since the Messiah is to be both king and high priest which is impossible under the law of Moses
Oh? And why is that?The law of Moses had to end with the coming of the Messiah since the Messiah is to be both king and high priest which is impossible under the law of Moses
thats true, but only partly. Jews and all mankind are alienated from God. To get closer to God, we need permanent & lasting atonement from sin (which keeps us alienated) and death (which ends our life and makes us even more alienated)
The mosaic law alone will not end sin and death. More is needed and that is why God promised to send a messiah who would "...finish off sin, and to make atonement for error, and to bring in righteousness for times indefinite..." as prophesied in Dan 9:24 and also described at length in Isaiah 53.
The only way to get close to God is to be free of sin and death.
Originally Posted by CMike
The purpose of jewish law is to get closer to G-D.
Oy.
Man will always sin. It's the ability to overcome temptation that brings us closer to G-D.
Without the temptation to sin we can't get closer to G-D. We would be robots.
As far as the passage from Daniel you quoted, once again context.
24. Seventy weeks [of years] have been decreed upon your people and upon the city of your Sanctuary to terminate the transgression and to end sin, and to expiate iniquity, and to bring eternal righteousness, and to seal up vision and prophet, and to anoint the Holy of Holies.
It's dealing of a specific time. The seventy years is from the destruction of the first temple until it's destruction the second time.
The foundation of all the commandments in the Torah rests on the very first one, to walk in Gods way and to cleave to him. Without the very first one, the remaining commandments are meaningless. I am deliberately using the King James Version of the Bible for the following verses because of the use of the word cleave. The kabbalists have a preference for the word cleave. I prefer to use the word embrace. Either or, it means the same. The starting point on ones path must be to seek God. The destination of the path is to embrace God. It is no coincidence the meaning of the English word religion means to reunite. Wrong motivation will only accomplish wrong results.Not at all. Just that the wrong intention doesn't necessarily negate the requirement to fulfill the Law.
And look closely at the passages that you posted.The foundation of all the commandments in the Torah rests on the very first one, to walk in Gods way and to cleave to him. Without the very first one, the remaining commandments are meaningless. I am deliberately using the King James Version of the Bible for the following verses because of the use of the word cleave. The kabbalists have a preference for the word cleave. I prefer to use the word embrace. Either or, it means the same. The starting point on ones path must be to seek God. The destination of the path is to embrace God. It is no coincidence the meaning of the English word religion means to reunite. Wrong motivation will only accomplish wrong results.
Mystical Union with the Divine: Devekut - KabbalahYe shall walk after the LORD your God, and fear him, and keep his commandments, and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him. (Deuteronomy 13:4)
22 For if ye shall diligently keep all these commandments which I command you, to do them, to love the Lord your God, to walk in all his ways, and to cleave unto him; 23 Then will the Lord drive out all these nations from before you, and ye shall possess greater nations and mightier than yourselves. (Deuteronomy 11:22-23)
G-d Awareness - Chasidic Masters
A person who gives and wants nothing in return gives far more than a person who wants to receive something back.And look closely at the passages that you posted.
For example, one may make big donations to the poor to get big tax donations. However, he still fulfills the commandment to help the poor regardless of the intention.
Oh? And why is that?
Also, it's not the laws of Moses, it's the laws of G-D.
do you really think the Daniel prophecy refers to the temples destruction the 2nd time?
The foundation of all the commandments in the Torah rests on the very first one, to walk in Gods way and to cleave to him. Without the very first one, the remaining commandments are meaningless. I am deliberately using the King James Version of the Bible for the following verses because of the use of the word cleave. The kabbalists have a preference for the word cleave. I prefer to use the word embrace. Either or, it means the same. The starting point on ones path must be to seek God. The destination of the path is to embrace God. It is no coincidence the meaning of the English word religion means to reunite. Wrong motivation will only accomplish wrong results.Mystical Union with the Divine: Devekut - KabbalahYe shall walk after the LORD your God, and fear him, and keep his commandments, and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him. (Deuteronomy 13:4)
22 For if ye shall diligently keep all these commandments which I command you, to do them, to love the Lord your God, to walk in all his ways, and to cleave unto him; 23 Then will the Lord drive out all these nations from before you, and ye shall possess greater nations and mightier than yourselves. (Deuteronomy 11:22-23)
G-d Awareness - Chasidic Masters
But why would you use Christian scripture to try to explain Jewish law?
This is something that often disturbed me in threads like this one: Judaism and Christianity are two separate religions, and the teachings of one have nothing to do with the other. We, as Jews, can quote Torah and Talmud, discuss Rashi, Ibn Ezra, and Rambam, and explain Jewish theology until we are blue in the face; it means nothing to Christians because they have their own understanding of God and their own Scriptures, sages, and theologians. They understand the concepts of sin, righteousness, redemption, law, and the messiah much differently than we do.
A lot of good can come from interfaith dialogue, but it needs to be undertaken with an attitude of understanding each other and not chastising or trying to prove each other wrong. They are Christians and they practice Christianity, not Judaism.
Your point is incorrect because stoning and sacrifice are no longer applied because of scripture which clearly shows that animals may only be sacrificed in a holy place which God chooses (ie: The Temple). Stoning was only done when there was a Sanhedrin, which there isn't anymore. It has nothing to do with the current culture or time we live in, it has to do with scripture.Well, yes when viewing certain parts of the Old testament. Is stoning relevant today? Is animal sacrifice relevant today? Those are just examples, But you see my point?
If you were to say "We are Christians and the law doesn't apply to us." I would just leave it at that. By saying that they are no longer relevant implies that they once were relevant to you. So explain to me why it was relevant at some point in time to not eat pork, but it is irrelevant to do so today.Some laws just are not relevant or necessary as they once were.
He is merely quoting the Torah. This same Torah says about many laws or feasts that they should be everlasting to future generations. At the very least, if the Torah was once relevant to you, then these laws should still be followed.Luke 10:25-27
25 On one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test Jesus. Teacher, he asked, what must I do to inherit eternal life?
26 What is written in the Law? he replied. How do you read it?
27 He answered, Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind; and, Love your neighbor as yourself.
Because God is a progressive God and His seconds are always greater than his first.Your point is incorrect because stoning and sacrifice are no longer applied because of scripture which clearly shows that animals may only be sacrificed in a holy place which God chooses (ie: The Temple). Stoning was only done when there was a Sanhedrin, which there isn't anymore. It has nothing to do with the current culture or time we live in, it has to do with scripture.
If you were to say "We are Christians and the law doesn't apply to us." I would just leave it at that. By saying that they are no longer relevant implies that they once were relevant to you. So explain to me why it was relevant at some point in time to not eat pork, but it is irrelevant to do so today.
He is merely quoting the Torah. This same Torah says about many laws or feasts that they should be everlasting to future generations. At the very least, if the Torah was once relevant to you, then these laws should still be followed.
Because God is a progressive God and His seconds are always greater than his first.
Makes no sense to me either.Because God is a progressive God and His seconds are always greater than his first.
Jesus was Jewish. Jesuss audience was Jewish. The writers of the canonical Gospels were Jewish. Jewish scripture was used as a point of reference for the canonical Gospels. According to the canonical Gospels, Jesus stressed to his Jewish audience they are to observe the commandments. But how do Gentiles fit into the equation? The answer must be found within Jewish scripture. To the best of my knowledge Gentiles are not required to convert to Judaism. But then again, what do I know? Im just some heretic Christian, LOLYour point is incorrect because stoning and sacrifice are no longer applied because of scripture which clearly shows that animals may only be sacrificed in a holy place which God chooses (ie: The Temple). Stoning was only done when there was a Sanhedrin, which there isn't anymore. It has nothing to do with the current culture or time we live in, it has to do with scripture.
If you were to say "We are Christians and the law doesn't apply to us." I would just leave it at that. By saying that they are no longer relevant implies that they once were relevant to you. So explain to me why it was relevant at some point in time to not eat pork, but it is irrelevant to do so today.
He is merely quoting the Torah. This same Torah says about many laws or feasts that they should be everlasting to future generations. At the very least, if the Torah was once relevant to you, then these laws should still be followed.