It´s OK by me if you don´t follow up on the critical articles of modern cosmology - but then don´t expose your lack of updates here.
Gareth’s video is a “critical article”. If it was, it would have mathematical modeling (equations) and data (eg measurements, quantities) from observations that represented his cosmology, and people would be able to analyze his works.
All his video showed that he have some flashy special effects without a single equation, without any data whatsoever, so his computer simulations are nothing more than fake fabrication.
And it is the same with videos from Robitaille, special effects without data, without mathematical equations, hence without substances.
You still cannot comprehend that even when a physicist start a new hypothesis, before he even to write an explanation of the phenomena, he must have at least preliminary observations of such phenomena.
Newton didn’t just make up his theory from the top of his head. He had observed natural phenomena of objects falling to the ground, and he was the only one, because about a century earlier, Galileo tried to explain falling objects by dropping things from the Tower of Pisa.
I don’t remember what experiments Newton himself had performed, but it would have required measuring the masses of objects, measuring the time they would have taken to fall to the ground from certain heights. The time and distance measured would have given the speed, or more precisely the velocity (because velocity include the direction with speed) of the falling objects, but more importantly it would provide the calculations for acceleration. The acceleration and mass would provide the calculations of the forces.
As you can see, or should see, Newton would have deducted the equations of not only the forces, but the downward velocity and acceleration, and the acceleration would be the same for masses of objects dropped from certain height, hence a constant acceleration 9.14 m/s^2.
Based on the technology of his time, Newton tried to explain what he observed, with some equations that are based on his observations and data he collected from his observations, measurements taken and numbers collected. His theory and equations were was based on observations, testing done and data collected.
Maxwell would have done the same things with his theory on electromagnetic fields. Maxwell didn’t invented his explanations from imagination, but based on his observations of the natural phenomena of magnets and electricity, to formulate his equations, data collected from observations and testing.
I don’t see anything remotely similar in Samuel’s video or in the moron Robitaille’s video. Where are their data (observations + measurements), where are their equations and numbers?
As I keep telling you without data from observations and from testings, their videos are just words that are only speculative and baseless.
Even you, won’t provide any observed data and equations for this Electric Universe cosmology. Any time someone like me,
@ecco ,
@Polymath257 or someone else have asked you to show equations and data , you would make some half-assed excuses and pretend no one have asked you again and again.