Skwim
Veteran Member
And what was he saying? He was repeating "leave me alone" over and over. Moreover, his tone and body language reflected these words perfectly. In essence: "I don't want to cooperate with you."Yes, I feel pretty confident in this particular judgement. Watch the video and make your own judgement. Listen to what this man is saying in the moments before the attack (yes, it was an attack). Listen to his tone of voice, look at his body language. This is a man who wanted to be heard. Yes, I feel sure in this evaluation.
How convenient that you ignored the other statement entirely.Yes, note the term "previously". That is not evidence that he was doing this on this occasion.
"A police officer's choke hold on a man being arrested for selling loose cigarettes killed him."
source
Your cherry picking here doesn't speak well of you at all.
This is an unknown, but just because it's not a known doesn't give one the right to assume there wasn't anything else more important going on. My working assumption is that law enforcement manning is guided by need, none of which would assume that the 3-4 policemen involved would be tied up "a half hour talking to this guy so that they can handle the situation safely" so as to arrest him. Police don't finesse perps into arrest, they take a pro-active approach to get the situation resolved as quickly as possible. Watch Cops or Cops Reloaded on TV and see if any of the police wait until the perp decides he's ready to go with them before they act. They don't. They cuff the guy as soon as they can.btw, I notice that you have still not answered my question. What in your judgement, opinion, imagination, could have been more important than talking to Eric Garner for a while in the attempt to diffuse the situation?