• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Gay Reproduction may be more Moral than Straight Reproduction

Uberpod

Uberpod

Active Member
If we all turned gay tomorrow, the propagation of the species would be lessened perhaps but by no means stopped. The overpopulation problem would be reversed. If all non-humans animals turned gay tomorrow, it would be the end of the species (without human intervention.) This is NOT TRUE of humans. Obviously WE KNOW how reproduction occurs and we would perpetuate other generations because we want to. How? Artificial insemination would occur for the squimish. Others would take one for the team through heterosexual (yuck) intercourse. Gay people can still do that and make it work but it is a chore. Gay people would have heterosex to get pregnant and homosex because it's hot and fun and enhances bonds with their same sexed loved one.

If we all turned gay tomorrow, the problem of abortion and unwanted or less wanted children would eventually be resolved almost completely!

If the motivation for getting pregnant were unhooked from the motivation to feel sexual pleasure we would have emaculate birth control.

If a gay pill comes out, clearly, we should all take it!
 
Quintessence

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
I have to say, the thread title is a bit misleading. "Gay reproduction" made me think of cutting-edge techniques that can convert egg cells to sperm cells (or vice versa) so homosexual couples can have biological children together. That's what I thought this thread was going to be about. And I was trying to figure out how this kind of arcane science was "more moral" than "straight reproduction" which can happen without any assistance (though not always; I don't mean to discount the prevalence of infertility).

As the content of the OP stands, however, I'm just going to assume this is a joke until told otherwise. Because what is really being argued here is that not reproducing is more moral than reproducing, not about "gay reproduction" (which as noted above, simply doesn't happen without significant intervention).
 
Uberpod

Uberpod

Active Member
Quintessence said:
As the content of the OP stands, however, I'm just going to assume this is a joke until told otherwise.
Click to expand...
How can truth be a joke!? This is no joke.

Because what is really being argued here is that not reproducing is more moral than reproducing, not about "gay reproduction" (which as noted above, simply doesn't happen without significant intervention).
Click to expand...
1) I guess it is true that I could be arguing that if reproduction were unhooked from sexual pleasure there would be a beneficial result. So the gay thing is not really necessary.

2) But, given that it is not unhooked for most people and gay people exist, I feel compelled to suggest that in gay families, every child is wanted (pretty much) while in straight families this is often not the case.

3) Gay's are given a boat load of ways they are disadvantaged. Here's one area where they are differently abled and can be proud. It's this and being able to share showers with eye candy.
 
Last edited:
Uberpod

Uberpod

Active Member
Gay reproduction simply refers to the population of gay people who reproduce not how they reproduce. It's not that hard.
 
illykitty

illykitty

RF's pet cat
Huh? I'm married, hetero relationship and don't plan on having children... Being hetero or bisexual doesn't mean automatically that someone will have children!

Also, I believe there's enough resources, just that people are too greedy but yes, it would be a good idea to slow down reproduction, only through education and encouragement from society... I don't think we need to become like China or all gay!
 
dgirl1986

dgirl1986

Big Queer Chesticles!
Uberpod said:
If we all turned gay tomorrow, the propagation of the species would be lessened perhaps but by no means stopped. The overpopulation problem would be reversed. If all non-humans animals turned gay tomorrow, it would be the end of the species (without human intervention.) This is NOT TRUE of humans. Obviously WE KNOW how reproduction occurs and we would perpetuate other generations because we want to. How? Artificial insemination would occur for the squimish. Others would take one for the team through heterosexual (yuck) intercourse. Gay people can still do that and make it work but it is a chore. Gay people would have heterosex to get pregnant and homosex because it's hot and fun and enhances bonds with their same sexed loved one.

If we all turned gay tomorrow, the problem of abortion and unwanted or less wanted children would eventually be resolved almost completely!

If the motivation for getting pregnant were unhooked from the motivation to feel sexual pleasure we would have emaculate birth control.

If a gay pill comes out, clearly, we should all take it!
Click to expand...

Fair point really and kind of makes a joke of the "homos will bring upon the end of the species" arguement.

I am hoping that I will be able to adopt when the time comes, otherwise I am in for some expensive artifical insemination :/
 
DallasApple

DallasApple

Depends Upon My Mood..
illykitty said:
Huh? I'm married, hetero relationship and don't plan on having children... Being hetero or bisexual doesn't mean automatically that someone will have children!

Also, I believe there's enough resources, just that people are too greedy but yes, it would be a good idea to slow down reproduction, only through education and encouragement from society... I don't think we need to become like China or all gay!
Click to expand...

I had 3 over 14 years..and now two grand babies.sorry I'm a "breeder" but being gay isn't the answer...Even gay people want kids..they go to lengths to have them.(their own biological children)
 
dgirl1986

dgirl1986

Big Queer Chesticles!
Uberpod said:
But, it is one possible answer. Correct?
Click to expand...

The possible answer is that allowing gay people to adopt or to have children shouldnt really be a big issue. The issue should be trying to deal with the problem of unwanted children and excessively large families that end up needing government assistance.
 
dgirl1986

dgirl1986

Big Queer Chesticles!
DallasApple said:
Agreed..not just unwanted...unable to feed.
Click to expand...

There are so many children being exposed to horrific home lives, poverty, street living etc that just breaks the heart. There must be something that could be done to tackle that. Not to mention all the children waiting to be adopted or fostered.
 
S

Slapstick

Active Member
Uberpod said:
If we all turned gay tomorrow, the propagation of the species would be lessened perhaps but by no means stopped. The overpopulation problem would be reversed. If all non-humans animals turned gay tomorrow, it would be the end of the species (without human intervention.) This is NOT TRUE of humans.
Obviously WE KNOW how reproduction occurs and we would perpetuate other generations because we want to. How? Artificial insemination would occur for the squimish. Others would take one for the team through heterosexual (yuck) intercourse. Gay people can still do that and make it work but it is a chore. Gay people would have heterosex to get pregnant and homosex because it's hot and fun and enhances bonds with their same sexed loved one.

If we all turned gay tomorrow, the problem of abortion and unwanted or less wanted children would eventually be resolved almost completely!

If the motivation for getting pregnant were unhooked from the motivation to feel sexual pleasure we would have emaculate birth control.

If a gay pill comes out, clearly, we should all take it!
Click to expand...
Being gay has nothing to do with unwarrented sex or sexual reproduction. People (specially males) can control their penis and should if they are not fully involved in a relationship or one supporting a child.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top