Gay Reproduction may be more Moral than Straight Reproduction

[dgirl1986]

Have you been asking the right questions?

What questions are there to ask?

 

[Me Myself]

If we all turned gay tomorrow, the propagation of the species would be lessened perhaps but by no means stopped. The overpopulation problem would be reversed. If all non-humans animals turned gay tomorrow, it would be the end of the species (without human intervention.) This is NOT TRUE of humans. Obviously WE KNOW how reproduction occurs and we would perpetuate other generations because we want to. How? Artificial insemination would occur for the squimish. Others would take one for the team through heterosexual (yuck) intercourse. Gay people can still do that and make it work but it is a chore. Gay people would have heterosex to get pregnant and homosex because it's hot and fun and enhances bonds with their same sexed loved one.

If we all turned gay tomorrow, the problem of abortion and unwanted or less wanted children would eventually be resolved almost completely!

If the motivation for getting pregnant were unhooked from the motivation to feel sexual pleasure we would have emaculate birth control.

If a gay pill comes out, clearly, we should all take it!

I said for some time now that we need way more committed homosexuals for overpopulation to ceise ot be an issue

 

[illykitty]

I had 3 over 14 years..and now two grand babies.sorry I'm a "breeder" but being gay isn't the answer...Even gay people want kids..they go to lengths to have them.(their own biological children)

Your answers seem a bit... Aggressive? I never accused anyone of being "breeders" nor do I ever use those terms. I just said that being married to the opposite sex doesn't equal having children and my choice was to not have them (I lack the motherly desires now - I used to want them when I was a teenager)

Also suggested that maybe we should (as a species) consider slowing down reproductive rates... I mean the planet is finite and our population is still growing a lot! No one is to blame, it's natural to want children (I'm the weird one) but we can't infinitely grow... At some point there isn't going to be enough for everyone.

I never blamed you for anything or judged you! And I agree being gay isn't an answer and sometimes they desire children too.

 

[crossfire]

If we all turned gay tomorrow, the propagation of the species would be lessened perhaps but by no means stopped. The overpopulation problem would be reversed. If all non-humans animals turned gay tomorrow, it would be the end of the species (without human intervention.) This is NOT TRUE of humans. Obviously WE KNOW how reproduction occurs and we would perpetuate other generations because we want to. How? Artificial insemination would occur for the squimish. Others would take one for the team through heterosexual (yuck) intercourse. Gay people can still do that and make it work but it is a chore. Gay people would have heterosex to get pregnant and homosex because it's hot and fun and enhances bonds with their same sexed loved one.

If we all turned gay tomorrow, the problem of abortion and unwanted or less wanted children would eventually be resolved almost completely!

If the motivation for getting pregnant were unhooked from the motivation to feel sexual pleasure we would have emaculate birth control.

If a gay pill comes out, clearly, we should all take it!

What's your plan for the domestic violence problem?

 

[Uberpod]

What's your plan for the domestic violence problem?

Are you referring to the purported higher rate of domestic abuse among gay couples? I think this marginal increase would pretty much disappear when both members are equally out of the closet and have family and community support of their union.

:slap: < ugly isn't it!!

 

[crossfire]

Are you referring to the purported higher rate of domestic abuse among gay couples? I think this marginal increase would pretty much disappear when both members are equally out of the closet and have family and community support of their union.

:slap: < ugly isn't it!!

I was referring to domestic violence/abuse in general.

 

[LuisDantas]

It is not at all unusual for gays to have offspring.

And yes, it is a good thing that nevertheless they contribute to lessen the demographic pressure.

 

[Uberpod]

Or we could learn to keep ourselves under control without needing to deny our sexual urges.

Are you suggesting self-abuse?

 

[Gjallarhorn]

Are you suggesting self-abuse?

Meaning?

 

[Uberpod]

Meaning?

That we should contain sexual urges through self-satisfaction.

 

[Gjallarhorn]

That we should contain sexual urges through self-satisfaction.

And you call it abuse. Sad. It's called masturbation, and no. There are many ways to have sex without risk of pregnancy.

 

[Uberpod]

And you call it abuse. Sad. It's called masturbation

LOL. I use the term in jest. It's not my term. It was used that way by nuns.

and no. There are many ways to have sex without risk of pregnancy.

Sure, but obviously that is easier said than done given the number of oops babies. It's not too helpful to state this without mentioning how it might be achieved.

 

[Gjallarhorn]

LOL. I use the term in jest. It's not my term. It was used that way by nuns.


Sure, but obviously that is easier said than done given the number of oops babies. It's not too helpful to state this without mentioning how it might be achieved.

If contraceptives don't fit your criteria, voluntary sterilization.

 

[crossfire]

If contraceptives don't fit your criteria, voluntary sterilization.

Unfortunately, if you are a young woman and ask for a tubal ligation, you will likely be denied. It seems that there is this idea going around that young women can't make that decision on their own.

 

[Gjallarhorn]

Unfortunately, if you are a young woman and ask for a tubal ligation, you will likely be denied. It seems that there is this idea going around that young women can't make that decision on their own.

Obviously that has to change. Viva la ligacion!

 

[Draka]

Unfortunately, if you are a young woman and ask for a tubal ligation, you will likely be denied. It seems that there is this idea going around that young women can't make that decision on their own.

Same goes for vasectomies I've heard. Seems doctors are reluctant to do any sterilization procedure on younger individuals, especially if they are childless to begin with. Truly, it is not the doctor's decision to make though, at least it shouldn't be.

 

[Me Myself]

Unfortunately, if you are a young woman and ask for a tubal ligation, you will likely be denied. It seems that there is this idea going around that young women can't make that decision on their own.

My personal hypothesis is that it is emotionally linked with the concept of "innocence" and how sex is "not innocent".

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

If we all turned gay tomorrow, the propagation of the species would be lessened perhaps but by no means stopped. The overpopulation problem would be reversed. If all non-humans animals turned gay tomorrow, it would be the end of the species (without human intervention.) This is NOT TRUE of humans. Obviously WE KNOW how reproduction occurs and we would perpetuate other generations because we want to. How? Artificial insemination would occur for the squimish. Others would take one for the team through heterosexual (yuck) intercourse. Gay people can still do that and make it work but it is a chore. Gay people would have heterosex to get pregnant and homosex because it's hot and fun and enhances bonds with their same sexed loved one.

If we all turned gay tomorrow, the problem of abortion and unwanted or less wanted children would eventually be resolved almost completely!

If the motivation for getting pregnant were unhooked from the motivation to feel sexual pleasure we would have emaculate birth control.

If a gay pill comes out, clearly, we should all take it!

Sorry, but this seems stupid to me and something about it strikes me as vaguely homophobic. I think it's the caricaturing of gay relationships. Not a fan of its hetero-bashing, either.

 

[Uberpod]

Sorry, but this seems stupid to me and something about it strikes me as vaguely homophobic. I think it's the caricaturing of gay relationships.

How so?

 

[Slapstick]

If we all turned gay tomorrow, the propagation of the species would be lessened perhaps but by no means stopped. The overpopulation problem would be reversed. If all non-humans animals turned gay tomorrow, it would be the end of the species (without human intervention.) This is NOT TRUE of humans. Obviously WE KNOW how reproduction occurs and we would perpetuate other generations because we want to. How? Artificial insemination would occur for the squimish. Others would take one for the team through heterosexual (yuck) intercourse. Gay people can still do that and make it work but it is a chore. Gay people would have heterosex to get pregnant and homosex because it's hot and fun and enhances bonds with their same sexed loved one.

If we all turned gay tomorrow, the problem of abortion and unwanted or less wanted children would eventually be resolved almost completely!

If the motivation for getting pregnant were unhooked from the motivation to feel sexual pleasure we would have emaculate birth control.

If a gay pill comes out, clearly, we should all take it!

If we all turned gay tomorrow I still wouldn't have sex with another male. Sorry, I think this comes down to personal preference.