• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Gender Apartheid

Ignatius A

Well-Known Member
Here is something fun. See if you can figure out the relevance:
Well I'm not too impressed by info offered by an apologist for a group of genocidal rabid dogs who have the same level of concern for their own citizens as they have for those of their enemy.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
Well I'm not too impressed by info offered by an apologist for a group of genocidal rabid dogs who have the same level of concern for their own citizens as they have for those of their enemy.

Yesh, you don't understand the relevance of the link to the debate. But that makes sense as it connects to how you do logic.
 

Ignatius A

Well-Known Member
Yesh, you don't understand the relevance of the link to the debate. But that makes sense as it connects to how you do logic.
So I am suppose to care more about the citizens under Hamas rule than Hamas does? And 90% of those people under Hamas rule support what hamas is doing. That's who I am suppose to care about?
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
So I am suppose to care more about the citizens under Hamas's rule than Hamas does? And 90% of those people under Hamas rule support what hamas is doing. That's who I am suppose to care about?

Can you explain this as per logic?
P1: A is B
P2: B is C
C: A is C

How do you explain that using words?
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
What about accurate claims like "war crimes"?

Do you think committing war crimes is a good solution to the problem?

I think that the blood of Palestinian civilians is NOT on Israel's hand, it's on the hands of the UN.
 

Ignatius A

Well-Known Member
Can you explain this as per logic?
P1: A is B
P2: B is C
C: A is C

How do you explain that using words?
Sure

P1: hamas is a band of genocidal rabid dogs
P2: genocidal rabid dogs are a threat to decent people
C: hamas is a threat to decent people

Now answer the questions in my previous post.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
So I am suppose to care more about the citizens under Hamas rule than Hamas does? And 90% of those people under Hamas rule support what hamas is doing. That's who I am suppose to care about?
Yeah, and screw the Jews, gays and gypsies too because Hitler didn't like them! :rolleyes:

You really aren't very good at this logic stuff.
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
I don't know how to add sound to Ignatius' deduction. But I will say this: I think that any Palestinian who supports Hamas is an absolute idiot, and deserves whatever happens to him or her.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Yeah, you think a lot, that is true. I will give you that. ;)
As I'm sure you know, forum rules strongly suggest that when making strong, potentially controversial claims, posters should always couch their claims with phrases like "i think" or "IMO".
 

Ignatius A

Well-Known Member
As I'm sure you know, forum rules strongly suggest that when making strong, potentially controversial claims, posters should always couch their claims with phrases like "i think" or "IMO".
Careful they might tell the mods how offended they are.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
As I'm sure you know, forum rules strongly suggest that when making strong, potentially controversial claims, posters should always couch their claims with phrases like "i think" or "IMO".

No, you always state objective, logical facts using science. That is your standard. ;)
 
Top