Thief
Rogue Theologian
Deduced facts....not observed.
Take a collection of observations and draw an idea.
That is what happened as the theory of evolution 'evolved'.
Some claim immediate results from immediate experiment......ok.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Genesis 2
- Thread starter dgirl1986
- Start date
Deduced facts....not observed.
Take a collection of observations and draw an idea.
That is what happened as the theory of evolution 'evolved'.
Some claim immediate results from immediate experiment......ok.
sincerly
Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
Evolution is based on observed facts, you do not get to discount them from a point of severe ignorance on the topic.
The IAP wouldn't have said there was a lack of "details" had there "actually" been as posted by Outposts---"observed facts".
Evolution is based on observed facts, you do not get to discount them from a point of severe ignorance on the topic.
The IAP wouldn't have said there was a lack of "details" had there "actually" been as posted by Outposts---"observed facts".
outhouse
Atheistically
Please learn how to use the quote feature.
Lets work with facts, not your biased opinion.
IAP - IAP Statement on the Teaching of Evolution
We agree that the following evidence-based facts about the origins and evolution of the Earth and of life on this planet have been established by numerous observations and independently derived experimental results from a multitude of scientific disciplines. Even if there are still many open questions about the precise details of evolutionary change, scientific evidence has never contradicted these results:
In a universe that has evolved towards its present configuration for some 11 to 15 billion years, our Earth formed approximately 4.5 billion years ago.
Since its formation, the Earth its geology and its environments has changed under the effect of numerous physical and chemical forces and continues to do so.
Life appeared on Earth at least 2.5 billion years ago. The evolution, soon after, of photosynthetic organisms enabled, from at least 2 billion years ago, the slow transformation of the atmosphere to one containing substantial quantities of oxygen. In addition to the release of the oxygen that we breathe, the process of photosynthesis is the ultimate source of fixed energy and food upon which human life on the planet depends.
Since its first appearance on Earth, life has taken many forms, all of which continue to evolve, in ways which palaeontology and the modern biological and biochemical sciences are describing and independently confirming with increasing precision. Commonalities in the structure of the genetic code of all organisms living today, including humans, clearly indicate their common primordial origin
IAP - IAP Statement on the Teaching of Evolution
While your at it please learn how to comprehend simple English.....................
sincerly
Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by sincerly View Post
The IAP wouldn't have said there was a lack of "details" had there "actually" been as posted by Outposts---"observed facts".
Outhouse, here is that simple English quote"---Even if there are still many open questions about the precise details of evolutionary change,...".
They haven't changed it and no matter how many times you post it---it will continue to have the stated lack of "details"/FACTS.
The IAP wouldn't have said there was a lack of "details" had there "actually" been as posted by Outposts---"observed facts".
Outhouse, here is that simple English quote"---Even if there are still many open questions about the precise details of evolutionary change,...".
They haven't changed it and no matter how many times you post it---it will continue to have the stated lack of "details"/FACTS.
outhouse
Atheistically
ENGLISH COMPREHENSION SKILLS PLEASE.
Precise details are not required to make a process a fact, it does not matter how the process happens, ONLY that it happens.
Evolution has been observed.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
What is this?!!!!!!!!!!!
Details are not required?!!!!!!
only that it happens?!!!!!!
Genesis can stand as is.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Which way do you want to go?
Observation only?
Or reasoning that leads to a sound 'notion' (theory)
sincerly
Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by sincerly View Post
The IAP wouldn't have said there was a lack of "details" had there "actually" been as posted by Outposts---"observed facts".
Outhouse, here is that simple English quote"---Even if there are still many open questions about the precise details of evolutionary change,...".
They haven't changed it and no matter how many times you post it---it will continue to have the stated lack of "details"/FACTS.
Outhouse, it is those "details" that determine just where those necessary "ingredients" arrived from. All those elements in the "periodic table" and even more so the "Life" that was produced in the "all things" that were given "life". Please "comprehend that fact".
The IAP wouldn't have said there was a lack of "details" had there "actually" been as posted by Outposts---"observed facts".
Outhouse, here is that simple English quote"---Even if there are still many open questions about the precise details of evolutionary change,...".
They haven't changed it and no matter how many times you post it---it will continue to have the stated lack of "details"/FACTS.
Outhouse, it is those "details" that determine just where those necessary "ingredients" arrived from. All those elements in the "periodic table" and even more so the "Life" that was produced in the "all things" that were given "life". Please "comprehend that fact".
outhouse
Atheistically
You dont even know how to use the quote feature let! alone debate something you know nothing about.
Do you know what a conclusion is?? what is the conclusion of the IAP?
sincerly
Well-Known Member
It is as I have stated---lacking "details" which makes it false as it is would have to be labeled since one portion without the details is only unsupported theory.
Your argument continues to be non-sequitur.
outhouse
Atheistically
You are no one to denounce the whole worlds science departments conclusions
You have no credibility and follow what most claim is mythology.
sincerly
Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by sincerly View Post
It is as I have stated---lacking "details" which makes it false .
Outhouse, I didn't, but the Scriptures have done a magnificent job of giving the necessary details which those scientist have acknowledged as not comprehended by them.
Their ultimate "conclusion" isn't "fact", but false---the myth that they are perpetuating.
It is as I have stated---lacking "details" which makes it false .
You are no one to denounce the whole worlds science departments conclusions
You have no credibility and follow what most claim is mythology.
Outhouse, I didn't, but the Scriptures have done a magnificent job of giving the necessary details which those scientist have acknowledged as not comprehended by them.
Their ultimate "conclusion" isn't "fact", but false---the myth that they are perpetuating.
sincerly
Well-Known Member
You are no one to denounce the whole worlds science departments conclusions
You have no credibility and follow what most claim is mythology.
Answered in previous post--still true.
sincerly
Well-Known Member
You have no credibility on this topic.
You are no one to denounce the whole worlds science departments conclusions
You have no credibility and follow what most claim is mythology.
Did I miss your credentials? Posting numerous times the same false accusations will not get a different answer. The previous post remains valid.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
You have no credibility on this topic.
You are no one to denounce the whole worlds science departments conclusions
You have no credibility and follow what most claim is mythology.
This looks like trolling....having been reposted as is.
Reiteration would be different.
And I say MOST people believe in God.
Genesis is soooooooo cool!