Triumphant_Loser
Libertarian Egalitarian
And... Your point being?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Genesis 2
- Thread starter dgirl1986
- Start date
And... Your point being?
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Have you been reading this thread?
Do you have a good question?.....or just killing time?
sincerly
Well-Known Member
You have no credibility on this topic.
You are no one to denounce the whole worlds science departments conclusions
You have no credibility and follow what most claim is mythology.
Your conclusions are still your witness to the truths which GOD expressed via the Biblical writers in the Scriptures. Those conclusions are Acknowledged as contrary to the Scriptures. Yes, the Creator GOD "finished HIS creating" of "All things".
Last edited:
sincerly
Well-Known Member
Repeating the same "mantra" shows your lack of credibility and or knowledge of the Scriptures.
In modern day terms, that's equivalent to "brain-washing".
sincerly
Well-Known Member
Then you do comprehend that you already have missed the boat.---The Ark only took aboard--Believers.
Triumphant_Loser
Libertarian Egalitarian
I believe in God also, but just because a majority of the population believes in something, does not make it true. Most people in the 1600's believed that the Earth was the center of the universe. That still does not mean it was true.
outhouse
Atheistically
outhouse
Atheistically
Yes, believers will follow mythology, true or not, they believe.
And they do so with NO evidence. its called FAITH.
And faith does not dictate reality or history or science
Ouroboros
Coincidentia oppositorum
And especially the scientific part where it in detail explains how God created life in the ice in antarctica and in the deep crust of Earth. I mean, it's really a scientific essay that has all the details. Isn't it? Also, the part of how God created aminoacids and even dipeptides in deep space! After all, the Universe is fine tuned for life, which means it must be filled with life everywhere. I'm looking forward to meeting our cousins from neighboring stars.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
And especially the scientific part where it in detail explains how God created life in the ice in antarctica and in the deep crust of Earth. I mean, it's really a scientific essay that has all the details. Isn't it? Also, the part of how God created aminoacids and even dipeptides in deep space! After all, the Universe is fine tuned for life, which means it must be filled with life everywhere. I'm looking forward to meeting our cousins from neighboring stars.
Sooner than you think.
I believe the spirit we are continues.
All that is left is the distance to get there.
sincerly
Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by Thief View Post Genesis is so cool.
Especially Chapter Two.
Yes, Genesis One and Two are "scientific essays" written and explained(by mankind) by/through the Creator GOD of all that one sees. Today, one still sees the "Life" which came from and is still maintained/sustained by the Love by which it is governed. One, also, sees the destructive forces and activity by which rebellion to that LOVE PRINCIPLE has caused.
The Creator GOD made it so---"fine tuned for life".
Scripturally, those "cousins" are only the Angels which are in/from heaven.
Especially Chapter Two.
And especially the scientific part where it in detail explains how God created life in the ice in antarctica and in the deep crust of Earth. I mean, it's really a scientific essay that has all the details. Isn't it? Also, the part of how God created aminoacids and even dipeptides in deep space! After all, the Universe is fine tuned for life, which means it must be filled with life everywhere. I'm looking forward to meeting our cousins from neighboring stars.
Yes, Genesis One and Two are "scientific essays" written and explained(by mankind) by/through the Creator GOD of all that one sees. Today, one still sees the "Life" which came from and is still maintained/sustained by the Love by which it is governed. One, also, sees the destructive forces and activity by which rebellion to that LOVE PRINCIPLE has caused.
The Creator GOD made it so---"fine tuned for life".
Scripturally, those "cousins" are only the Angels which are in/from heaven.
outhouse
Atheistically
How can you debate science when you cannot even use the quote feature correctly?
outhouse
Atheistically
Substantiate your comment.
The educated world follows this. It is taught in every major university around the world as higher learning and education.
Young Earth creationism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Young Earth Creationism is contradicted by scientific evidence from numerous scientific disciplines that shows the age of the universe is 13.798±0.037 billion years, the formation of the Earth was 4.5 billion years ago, and life first appeared on Earth at least 2.5 billion years ago.[8][9][10][11]
Young Earth Creationism directly contradicts the scientific consensus of the scientific community.
"99.9 percent of scientists accept evolution
Genesis creation narrative - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Genesis creation narrative is the creation myth of both Judaism and Christianity.
MYTH
sincerly
Well-Known Member
My use of the "quote feature" isn't the topic of debate. Even though you have tried to make it so.
outhouse
Atheistically
It shows your credibility to learn new things. Some would say it also related to intellect.
So you know everything? and are above learning?
If so then you are only proselytizing your opinion, your not here to learn. This is against forum rules.
sincerly
Well-Known Member
Substantiate your comment.
The educated world follows this. It is taught in every major university around the world as higher learning and education.
Young Earth creationism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Young Earth Creationism is contradicted by scientific evidence from numerous scientific disciplines that shows the age of the universe is 13.798±0.037 billion years, the formation of the Earth was 4.5 billion years ago, and life first appeared on Earth at least 2.5 billion years ago.[8][9][10][11]
Young Earth Creationism directly contradicts the scientific consensus of the scientific community.
"99.9 percent of scientists accept evolution
Genesis creation narrative - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Genesis creation narrative is the creation myth of both Judaism and Christianity.
MYTH
From the IAP statement: """We agree that the following evidence-based facts about the origins and evolution of the Earth and of life on this planet have been established by numerous observations and independently derived experimental results from a multitude of scientific disciplines. Even if there are still many open questions about the precise details of evolutionary change,..."""
Substantiated by their own admission.
I believe what was given by GOD to the Prophets---NOT what was compiled by "editors of Wikipedia".
sincerly
Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by sincerly View Post
My use of the "quote feature" isn't the topic of debate. Even though you have tried to make it so.
It seems the proselytizing is by you. My ability to learn new things is contingent upon the content and NOT by your criteria or judgment of "intellect".
Now you are attacking me rather than staying with the topic.
My "opinion" is that which I have gleaned from the Scriptures---which happens to be the basis for these topics.
My use of the "quote feature" isn't the topic of debate. Even though you have tried to make it so.
It seems the proselytizing is by you. My ability to learn new things is contingent upon the content and NOT by your criteria or judgment of "intellect".
Now you are attacking me rather than staying with the topic.
My "opinion" is that which I have gleaned from the Scriptures---which happens to be the basis for these topics.