sincerly
Well-Known Member
That's not how the chapter said, though I guess you can interpret it as you want.
Hi FM, since you made no correction to my post, my post still stands.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's not how the chapter said, though I guess you can interpret it as you want.
It reduces GOD to a "symbolic narrative"; Therefore; MYTH
Right, the "rules" placed by the ???? are why there is still areas of dispute concerning some topics and Religion is one of those where non-believers have clout.
Hi FM, Mankind and the land animals were created on the Sixth day. Chapter 1 was finished as all things were completed----even "to male and female created them"(vs27)
In Chapter 2, one finds the details of that week's creation listed following the establishing of the Seventh day of Creation as the Sabbath---Blessed and sanctified.
In those "generations" of the heavens and the earth when they were created/made."
It was the same Male/Adam that named the Animals on that sixth day that all were created. It was Adam/male from who Eve was surgically removed on the Sixth day and marriage/one flesh was established.
Which god? El or Yahweh
Israelites wrote about both.
El is the hebrew word meaning God
Yahweh is the personal name of El.
El is the hebrew word meaning God
Yahweh is the personal name of El.
captainbryce said:My point is, you're proceeding from a false assumption. That's not necessarily what "days" refer to in this context. Your original comment was this: "I think you are confusing the days as in of indefinite period (hence age, era or epoch) in English, and I might be wrong, but the Hebrew word יוֹם doesn't mean "age" at all; I don't think as many meaning as they do in English." Your argument is faulty due to the fact that in Hebrew, the word has more than the one meaning you have assigned to it.
captainbryce said:Genesis 1:1
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
Guess what, the first verse, of the first book of the bible establishes that EVERYTHING in the universe was created "IN THE BEGINNING". The phrase "the heavens and the earth" would have been understood to mean the entire universe, that is all matter, energy, space and time were created in the beginning. That means, the sun, the moon, the stars, and everything else that occupies the heavens. The sun (which is in the heavens) existed before the first day, and light existed before the first day. We know that this light comes from the sun, because God was able to seperate it into day and night (establishing the rotation of the earth). It is only AFTER everything is created (in the beginning) does the Earth experience its first rotation.
False, your wrong.
Its not about dispute or clout.
Its about common knowledge and closed minds.
You making baseless assumption as to what type of DAY is being used in those verses. To make it mean AGE or ERA or EPOCH is something else, in which you can't prove, except taking the verse out of context.
You're taking the verse completely out-of-context. Nothing indicate God creating the heavens and earth, as if it was creating the UNIVERSE. You are trying to mix modern astronomy with theology.
Heaven either means God's abode, or the sky. To say that it is the universe is nothing more than twisting the verse to suit your belief: nothing more, nothing less.
This thread is more to common language and closed minds....
a war of words with no substance.
Oh!...there's that word 'substance' ...again.
Agreed.
Not only that there are verses in the bible that state a 24 hour day is just that.
But somehow it gets perverted.
What is worse is it flat states day and night, yet they choose to pervert that as well.
All to back a unsubstantiated literal interpretation, while ignoring real history, knowledge and education, in favor of known mythology.
It just ruins the beauty of these epic pieces.
Your using the word 'pervert' in place of 'interpret'.
No
Your now guilty as they are.
Your telling the author how to interpret his own words and the author is telling you your wrong.
You are your own example.
You are not my judge....or anything close to it.
I can surely judge your attempt at TRYING to pervert my statement.
Bias no. Nor can you site a credible example. But will you be dancing around this little jewel?
Creation myth - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A creation myth is a symbolic narrative of how the world began and how people first came to inhabit it.[2][3] By far the most well-known creation myth is the Genesis creation narrative
Bias no. Nor can you site a credible example. But will you be dancing around this little jewel?
Creation myth - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A creation myth is a symbolic narrative of how the world began and how people first came to inhabit it.[2][3] By far the most well-known creation myth is the Genesis creation narrative