I believe there are a few out here
.
This is an old video after the "dover trial". Ken Miller was the PBS Darwanian Biologist in "Evolution Series". (I had to look that up tonight).
What exactly is the question? Is it concerning a common DNA library?
Is it directed versus accidental progression of species from a common DNA library?
Is it just a statement that the video has all the information one needs to enjoy a good conversation.
My question to you is: What part of a metaphysical question do you think anybody can prove?
When evolution and ID have metaphysical presuppositions, the end result is not going to be under the "scientific method" scrutiny.
Inherent in the Big Bang theory are two presuppositions that are similar to the Evolution theory: 1) There are no outside forces affecting the process 2) very long periods of time are required for the process.
These are reasonable presuppositions, but unprovable.
Inherent in the Creation Myth that is described in Genesis are three presupposition: 1) There was a outside force affecting the process 2) Time is relative 3) The English translation of the Bible is full of the same information as the Hebrew text .
The first is reasonable and unprovable. The second is true and has been proven. The last one is false and provable.
Good stuff.
How do you explain the creation of the entire universe ? (you can substitute evolution for universe with less books written).
Can you write millions of books that document every measurement that is possible concerning astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, mathematics, physics and other studies and still not know how the universe started? The answer is yes.
Can you write just 32 sentences in an ancient book and have enough information to document an outline of the entire creation event? The answer is yes.