• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Gnosticism and Taoism

Buttons*

Glass half Panda'd
See, i never understood that Gnosticism was a dualistic religion... cause i saw the One in it all...

what do yall think?
 

d.

_______
Buttons* said:
...so do those steps give a purpose? Is that what you're saying the difference is? Okay, so Gnostics have to gain gnosis to understand whereas Toaists just... exist?

i would say that the knowledge that can be found in taoism teaches you that there isn't much to know...and that you already know it. anyone can find it. imho.
 

d.

_______
Halcyon said:
The One is in everything, everything is of the One.

To me, from what i've read of the Tao Te Ching, our concept of The One is almost identical to the Tao.

i don't know much about gnosticism, but based on your post i would agree with you.
 

ChrisP

Veteran Member
divine said:
i would say that the knowledge that can be found in taoism teaches you that there isn't much to know...and that you already know it. anyone can find it. imho.
I agree with this wholeheartedly. We love to complicate things with "reason" and analysis us humans :rolleyes:
 

d.

_______
ChrisP said:
I agree with this wholeheartedly. We love to complicate things with "reason" and analysis us humans :rolleyes:
but then i would also say that the human experience is infinitely simple, and infinitely complex. you agree?
 

ChrisP

Veteran Member
divine said:
but then i would also say that the human experience is infinitely simple, and infinitely complex. you agree?
I would say it was neither :). But that's just me being silly :p
 

ChrisP

Veteran Member
divine said:
define 'mystic' though?

because i don't see taoism as 'mystical' at all.
Taoism is not Mystical. The tao is though I think. That is probably where Taoism and Gnosis differ. Gnostic practises endeavour to find the source to explain all, whereas Taoism believes that all explains the source? I'm sure Halcyon will bring out the badger warriors if I'm wrong.
 

Buttons*

Glass half Panda'd
Yeah, I'll let Halcyon fight my battles for me, :p
My panda group isnt as convincing as his badger army...

Well, mystic just refers to seeing beyond what's written. Can't anyone can be a mystic? Gnosticism doesnt try to explain the One, it talks about it much like Taoist writings talk about the Tao... If you wanna read something sorta like taoist writings (well, from what i've read), i'd check Thunder in gnostic literature...
 

Buttons*

Glass half Panda'd
divine said:
i would say that the knowledge that can be found in taoism teaches you that there isn't much to know...and that you already know it. anyone can find it. imho.
i agree. i think gnosticism is the same way.... (well, dur ashley, thats why you made the thread)
 

d.

_______
Buttons* said:
Well, mystic just refers to seeing beyond what's written.

how? i'm sorry, i don't understand.


Buttons* said:
If you wanna read something sorta like taoist writings (well, from what i've read), i'd check Thunder in gnostic literature...

thanks, i'll check it out.
 

Scarlett Wampus

psychonaut
ChrisP said:
Someone needs to PM S_W cos I think he missed this thread! That man is a master.
Only a master of evil, Darth...:sarcastic

I found a four part article on the net that compares Gnosticism with Taoism. Part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4. The guy who wrote it also summed up his own personal synthesis of them.

Although they might differ in many respects, especially their metaphysical accounts of creation (though there are widely varying accounts of this even within Taoism), when I read things like this (from the Religious Tolerance website): -

Gnosticism is not factual, intellectual, rational knowledge, such as is involved in mathematics and physics; that would have been more accurately represented by the Greek world "episteme." Rather, Gnosticism involves the relational or experiential knowledge of God and of the divine or spiritual nature within us.

...that sounds a lot like Te to me.

Ashley I see what you mean by 'Thunder'. Loosely I would associate a text like Thunder Perfect Mind with the Mysterious Female (a symbol of Gnosis from Taoism). Also, this stuff about the physical world being 'bad' and only redeemed through the spiritual realm which is 'good' might seem different to Taoism, but not that much. Example from a Taoist Cultivation website discussing alchemy: -

The mysterious pass is profoundly subtle. It is not an ordinary aperture or place of the body which has shape and form and can be pointed to. The mysterious pass is immaterial and formless, and is without physical location. It is where essence and life abide. It is the intangible which connects with the primordial source. It is called the opening of the mysterious female, the door of birth and death, the commencement of non-being, and the great valley, yet all these terms refer to a basic immaterial quality of consciousness which has to do with reaching open and vital spiritual essence.

Just some random wanderings. :)
 

Buttons*

Glass half Panda'd
Scarlett Wampus said:
Only a master of evil, Darth...:sarcastic

I found a four part article on the net that compares Gnosticism with Taoism. Part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4. The guy who wrote it also summed up his own personal synthesis of them.

Although they might differ in many respects, especially their metaphysical accounts of creation (though there are widely varying accounts of this even within Taoism), when I read things like this (from the Religious Tolerance website): -

Gnosticism is not factual, intellectual, rational knowledge, such as is involved in mathematics and physics; that would have been more accurately represented by the Greek world "episteme." Rather, Gnosticism involves the relational or experiential knowledge of God and of the divine or spiritual nature within us.

...that sounds a lot like Te to me.

Ashley I see what you mean by 'Thunder'. Loosely I would associate a text like Thunder Perfect Mind with the Mysterious Female (a symbol of Gnosis from Taoism). Also, this stuff about the physical world being 'bad' and only redeemed through the spiritual realm which is 'good' might seem different to Taoism, but not that much. Example from a Taoist Cultivation website discussing alchemy: -

The mysterious pass is profoundly subtle. It is not an ordinary aperture or place of the body which has shape and form and can be pointed to. The mysterious pass is immaterial and formless, and is without physical location. It is where essence and life abide. It is the intangible which connects with the primordial source. It is called the opening of the mysterious female, the door of birth and death, the commencement of non-being, and the great valley, yet all these terms refer to a basic immaterial quality of consciousness which has to do with reaching open and vital spiritual essence.

Just some random wanderings. :)
that's more what i'm talking about, thanks so much for that *hugs*
 

michel

Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
Scarlett Wampus said:
Only a master of evil, Darth...:sarcastic

I found a four part article on the net that compares Gnosticism with Taoism. Part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4. The guy who wrote it also summed up his own personal synthesis of them.

Although they might differ in many respects, especially their metaphysical accounts of creation (though there are widely varying accounts of this even within Taoism), when I read things like this (from the Religious Tolerance website): -

Gnosticism is not factual, intellectual, rational knowledge, such as is involved in mathematics and physics; that would have been more accurately represented by the Greek world "episteme." Rather, Gnosticism involves the relational or experiential knowledge of God and of the divine or spiritual nature within us.

...that sounds a lot like Te to me.

Ashley I see what you mean by 'Thunder'. Loosely I would associate a text like Thunder Perfect Mind with the Mysterious Female (a symbol of Gnosis from Taoism). Also, this stuff about the physical world being 'bad' and only redeemed through the spiritual realm which is 'good' might seem different to Taoism, but not that much. Example from a Taoist Cultivation website discussing alchemy: -

The mysterious pass is profoundly subtle. It is not an ordinary aperture or place of the body which has shape and form and can be pointed to. The mysterious pass is immaterial and formless, and is without physical location. It is where essence and life abide. It is the intangible which connects with the primordial source. It is called the opening of the mysterious female, the door of birth and death, the commencement of non-being, and the great valley, yet all these terms refer to a basic immaterial quality of consciousness which has to do with reaching open and vital spiritual essence.

Just some random wanderings. :)

I wish I could 'wander' like that! Great stuff! Thank you, Michel:)
 

Halcyon

Lord of the Badgers
divine said:
how? i'm sorry, i don't understand.
mys·ti·cal
adj.
  1. Of or having a spiritual reality or import not apparent to the intelligence or senses.
  2. Of, relating to, or stemming from direct communion with ultimate reality or God: a mystical religion.
  3. Enigmatic; obscure: mystical theories about the securities market.
  4. Of or relating to mystic rites or practices.
  5. Unintelligible; cryptic.
Gnosticism, and Taoism i believe, are mystical religions because they don't take things at face value but look for the hidden or deeper meaning.

I know of very little Gnostic myth or speculation that should be taken in a literal sense, a lot of Gnostic 'poetry' which is often used when trying to describe The One, is made up of contrary statements eg. It is not large it is not small, It is not corporeal it is not incorporeal, It is not conscious it is not unconscious, etc...

When dealing with The One, Gnosticism tries to explain in words what is inexplicable in words. Much like the Tao Te Ching.

When it comes to myth, we find stories like Adam And Eve in the garden turned on their head - this has a dual purpose;

Firstly it attempts to show people like the literalists and extreme orthodox how the same myth can be viewed and interpreted from an entirely different perspective. Try and get them to think. (Doesn't work though)

Secondly, these myths are used to explain Gnostic concepts and views of the universe. For example in Gnosticism, Adam (humanity) is lifeless and ignorant until Eve (life) with the aid of the serpent picks the fruit of Gnosis and brings understanding to mankind - this sets us on the path out of the ignorance of Demiurge and towards the true understanding of God.... or Tao.

The same characters and events occur, but the meaning is very different.
 

Buttons*

Glass half Panda'd
Okay, so i have many ideas and no conclusion. (course, we come to our own conclusions, and just cause I dont have one, not everyone must have one, i know this.... but play along for my sake...)

Do most people agree that there are big similarities in both IDEAS? (didnt say religions)

Are they, fundamentally the same idea? (or, are the authors trying to get the same point across....)

...The reason i ask is because I'm thinking of looking into Taoism to further what I feel from the Gnostic texts. I wasnt sure how well it would go together, or if it was worth trying. Thank you all SO much for your helpful information! :)
 
Top