Why don't you let him post much?My hubby. Daddy to my kids. He doesn't post a lot here. On and off, here and there.
He doesn't seem that big an embarrassment.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why don't you let him post much?My hubby. Daddy to my kids. He doesn't post a lot here. On and off, here and there.
Easy for you to say. You don't have to take him out in public.Why don't you let him post much?
He doesn't seem that big an embarrassment.
Then what is sex scene lolBut showing breasts isn't a sex scene, so why bring that up?
Porn is group of people filming while making sex , and publish it.I think Godobyer said it having the posts that say it's okay because it is an art while porn is an art too.
@Godobeyer : could this be the reason?
Thank you for the suggestion, but I no longer have the ability to edit my OP, and I think the picture has been up long enough for most people to have seen it. However, I will post a link to the video of the scene, which is: HERE
Since the picture was removed, you may want to edit a substitute in its place. Perhaps a link towould suffice?
It would be entirely a factor of how much I trusted the society she lived in. In Brazil I would not.
Uh, a scene in which people are having sex. The naked body alone is not sex. A breast is not sex. Two, or even more, people engaged in sexual relations like vaginal intercourse or oral or anal sex and the like would constitute a sex scene. But a boob...is just a boob.Then what is sex scene lol
What if the sex scene in question is of a husband and wife? If a married couple sets up a camera in their bedroom and records themselves having sex is that "cuckold"? If for their private viewing pleasure? If for public viewing pleasure with both their consent?Porn is group of people filming while making sex , and publish it.
for your opinion SG :
Is sex scene consider as cuckold or art ?
if yes, is cuckold is good ?
Porn is an art? i don't know if I would classify it as such. Either way, since porn is not the discussion here, the naked breast is, I still don't see the connection.
Porn is group of people filming while making sex , and publish it.
for your opinion SG :
Is sex scene consider as cuckold or art ?
if yes, is cuckold is good ?
Obviously it isn't against the law because she did it and there were no legal repercussions, for anyone.At 16, no, I would not approve of it...and, it is against the law as far as I know, at least in the US (I think actors have to be 18 under federal law). .
Right, boobs that in many states any female is allowed to bare.No, I would not consent to porn. There are numerous reasons for that that I think should be self-explanatory. But as for just nudity, being topless, I don't see an issue. We aren't talking about sex, we're talking about boobs.
Of course there isn't any, but oftentimes when a person's point is fairly well shot down they exaggerate the issue by bringing in irrelevancies. Hardly a commendable practice, people.Porn is an art? i don't know if I would classify it as such. Either way, since porn is not the discussion here, the naked breast is, I still don't see the connection.
And they're not. I think that some of the members here are simply uptight about nudity.I would suggest that just photos or depictions of the naked body by itself is not "porn".
It is against the law. I think you might have overlooked what he was responding to. The question he was replying to was whether or not those that said yes about being topless would approve of their 16 year old daughter doing hard-core porn.Obviously it isn't against the law because she did it and there were no legal repercussions, for anyone.
.
I dont know about many Playboy models becoming porn stars, I havent heard of that at all really. And Playboy I find artistic actually. In fact, there's a pile of some just a few feet from me. Now, magazines such as Hustler are more on the pornographic side, but Playboy? No. Not really. At least not in my opinion.Well, porn is not what couple typically do in real life and it involves studies performance. Many call porn actors performers and, well, actors. But given the conditions you provided, I tend to agree.
It still worries me because I typically think of young woman out there as my own daughters *I'm not a father, but I have nieces and I'm 33) and sisters in what they go thru. Play Boy started with just boobs, then escalated to lower parts and finally many of its models became porn stars.
الديوث هههههههههI don't know what a cuckold is
It is against the law. I think you might have overlooked what he was responding to. The question he was replying to was whether or not those that said yes about being topless would approve of their 16 year old daughter doing hard-core porn.
Hard core porn is against the law for a 16 year old.
Here,it's different,breast is consider as sex scene,and shamefullUh, a scene in which people are having sex. The naked body alone is not sex. A breast is not sex. Two, or even more, people engaged in sexual relations like vaginal intercourse or oral or anal sex and the like would constitute a sex scene. But a boob...is just a boob.
No I am talking about someone agree that his wife doing sex scene with man.What if the sex scene in question is of a husband and wife? If a married couple sets up a camera in their bedroom and records themselves having sex is that "cuckold"? If for their private viewing pleasure? If for public viewing pleasure with both their consent?
Would depend on how tasteful or degrading the scene in particular was.
Permission for a minor to do something is such situations is not verbal, but written and signed contract. The minor cannot make legal decisions on their own, and to ensure that the film company cannot be sued for anything in particular that the minor may do in their movie, they must have the contractual permission of a parent or legal guardian.Also, even as older than 16, they are still our daughters. The thread is about permission and approval which is verbal, not allowing which involves letting or making them not. One may not permit or approve but still leaves the person do what they want. I think it is all about family ethics. People with good family bonds tend to respect what their parents' wishes unconditionally. Then again, I think even that is a cultural thing.
But no actual sex is involved. It is just a body part being shown, like a foot or a man's chest. Is a baby breastfeeding a sex scene? It involves a breast. Does that make it a sex scene?Here,it's different,breast is consider as sex scene,and shamefull
So porn made by married couples is okay? What if it is the married man engaging in porn instead of the wife? Is that different?No I am talking about someone agree that his wife doing sex scene with man.