When I mean by God, I am technically only referring to just the belief of theist(s) concept of a god, and not an actual god. And this concept of God does exist.If a god exists, it's going the right way to make sure it does get the method flawed.
If it's manmade, and in many instances, it is proven it is. It is going the right way to make sure of more manmade gods. This can be proven.
But some theists can't grasp this understanding, so they will say something along the lines of, "How do you know what God is thinking, what are your evidence?" It's funny how some of those theists actually think, that that question is the fatal blow to their opponents' argument, prematurely celebrating their "Gotcha" moment,
not realizing that their question can easily be turned on them.
I wonder, after this post, who will be the one to bring up the ontological argument for God.