I kept the wording open intentionally, and did not ask if you 'believe' in God or 'believe' in evolution. Are the concepts of God and evolution compatible or not, and if they are not, which concept makes the most sense to you? You could probably substitute the phrase "scientific approach to understanding the world" for "evolution."
Ok you have two models you are trying to meld:
Evolution
God (Christian in your case)
The first thing I want to point out to you is that most of the people theists and non-theists alike realize that the models don't meld very easily. Even your Christian brothers and sisters see problems with what they deem as micro-evolution, specie mutations, and purely organic life medical biological definitions of life and death vs Christian definitions of life and death. I noticed you didn't address my mutually exclusive example of man as the zenith of creation and man as another mutation along an endless series of mutations.
I feel like in your case, essentially the elephant in the room is that both your religious peers (Christians) and non-theists see that essentially you are attempting to intragrate two separate and distinct models.
A number of questions for you in your "reconciliation of the two are as follows:
1) evolutionary theory says man is a mutation in a series of biological mutations. Your religion says man is the zenith of creation. How can you reconcile those two mutually exclusive ideas?
2) Biological theory holds that all living things are composed of carbon and dna but your religion says there is a non-carbon based non-dna composed soul that is living. These two ideas are mutually exclusive to me. How do you reconcile that?
3) Biological theory states that life is a finite experience where all living organisms that are born will one day die. Your religion by contrast stipulates that people who have faith in Jesus will not die but instead transition to a spirtual form and live much longer, maybe forever. These two ideas again are mutually exclusive by design. How do you reconcile them?
I could list out more but I think this kinda scratches the surface. The reality is the two models, Christianity and evolution do not fit so easily together. For one to attempt to intragrate the two concessions or changes need to be made to one or both of the models so they can fit. We see these changes in things like:
1) Christians rejecting "micro-evolution" but accepting other aspects of it
2) Christians rejecting the 6 day birth of man theory but still accepting a non-evidenceable God made man as opposed to man being the product of genetic drift over a long period of time.
3) Christians accepting evolution but rejecting the idea that man may evolve and change over time
ect ect.
Rather than running a poll and voting without laying out the details the real challenge for you will be to construct both models as you understand them in terms of principles and see where they fit and where they don't before saying
"I believe in God and evolution" , or "I accept both God and evolution" ect ect.
I feel like in this case constructing both models and looking at them both separately and than as a possible melded model is a much more academic method of assessing your assertion as opposed to voting and not detailing why you or others say yes or no to the question of "evolution and God."
A really good place to start out for you would be to address this:
1) Do you accept evolution based on the evidence used to support it or do you accept evolution based on faith?
2) Do you accept God on the evidence used to support his existence or do you accept God on faith.
If the answer to number 1 and number 2 is different why the different standards of measurement for # 1 and # 2 and is this an issue in the melding of your two models?
