יְהֹוָ֥ה אֱלֹהִ֖ים ( 'Adonai' Elohim ) aka HashemWhat does "God" refer to in your religion or culture?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
יְהֹוָ֥ה אֱלֹהִ֖ים ( 'Adonai' Elohim ) aka HashemWhat does "God" refer to in your religion or culture?
Of course. He's the personification of people's own ego, emotion, and prejudice.and popular too.
Never saw either from them.you forgot Love and the four horseman
I'm counter-sue.I’m sue....
That 1 foot radius has been around a long time,.....when you say “Here in USA” you mean in the general vicinity of 1 foot from wherever you are at.
Money is one of the greatest inventionsI thought that was "money"?
The Hebrew god's name is Yahweh/Jehovah. God is a noun, not a name. Abrahamics use God has Yahweh's name but that is not correct. I know why they do this, thinking there is only one god.No, not the being, deity, concept, or whatever you call God, but the name itself, especially in interfaith discourse or when speaking to the non-religious.
I've seen "God" (note the capitalization rendering the word a proper noun) used to describe everything from a personal deity, to a creator, to an underlying substratum for reality, to existence itself, and many things between. Yet people use the word even when their religion or culture has another name for it.
An example off the top of my head is Ramakrishna apparently referring to Nirguna Brahman as "God" in The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna. Of course, what he means is understood by Vedantins and probably most Hindus, but the meaning of the term is likely lost on people outside of this subset.
What does "God" refer to in your religion or culture?
Do you agree that use of the term is problematic outside of your own religion or culture? If not, how do you reconcile the differences? If so, what do you think can be done to communicate what is being referred to in interfaith dialogue or conversations with the non-religious?
Its not a fully inclusive list. You want more?
Money is one of the greatest inventions
of humankind. It's like oil to a machine,
ie, without it, motion grinds to a halt.
BTW, beware what televangelists
will do to get money
Most people won’t be within the 1 ft radius.I'm counter-sue.
That 1 foot radius has been around a long time,
& traveled coast to coast. You God is a violent
POS who loves genocide, murder, & smiting.
No.The list of what, atheist grievances? I’m sure it’s endless
The buck has neve failed me.It’s your nation’s one true God, is it not? From Trump to televangelists, from Warhol to Walmart, you all believe in the almighty buck, right?
Certainly not to you.Most people won’t be within the 1 ft radius.
You say “God is violent” and yet you don’t demonstrate love.
Yes, it must comfort you to read a passage thatReminds me of a scripture… “In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God."
ORIGIN OF RELIGIONIn my understanding religion was originally an English term which referred to the regularity with which one attended mass. Since then the West has broadened the term to reflect all ways of life which other people do instead of that but also including it. Its a vague term 'Religion', but no it isn't a set of beliefs. Beliefs are themselves practices. The usefulness of the term 'Religion' is that it allows us to discuss groups of people by the way we perceive them: such as by their funny hats, where they meet, what they do and also by what they say they believe. If I call someone a Buddhist I don't have to know what a Buddhist really is. Its just a useful term. I say their religion is Buddhism, and that is enough for the term to be useful. In order to call them Buddhist all I need to know is that something about them: such as that they live in a monastery and wear orange or that they are a member of a group of Buddhists or that they meditate on Buddhist texts. I don't have to know what they believe or how they cook their food though these things can be very important in their religion.
In other words a recognition that a particular set of people share the same set of beliefs (more or less) that is the cause for their participation in those rites, rituals, and customs that is perpetuated by that set of beliefs.Its just a useful term. I say their religion is Buddhism, and that is enough for the term to be useful. In order to call them Buddhist all I need to know is that something about them
Love is the term that the biased often claim that god is.Never saw either from them.
Yes, I see it as very problematic, especially in interfaith. I think we can thank some translators for the mess. The version of 'God' I adhere to simply would not do much of the stuff attributed to the 'God' of other faiths.No, not the being, deity, concept, or whatever you call God, but the name itself, especially in interfaith discourse or when speaking to the non-religious.
I've seen "God" (note the capitalization rendering the word a proper noun) used to describe everything from a personal deity, to a creator, to an underlying substratum for reality, to existence itself, and many things between. Yet people use the word even when their religion or culture has another name for it.
An example off the top of my head is Ramakrishna apparently referring to Nirguna Brahman as "God" in The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna. Of course, what he means is understood by Vedantins and probably most Hindus, but the meaning of the term is likely lost on people outside of this subset.
What does "God" refer to in your religion or culture?
Do you agree that use of the term is problematic outside of your own religion or culture? If not, how do you reconcile the differences? If so, what do you think can be done to communicate what is being referred to in interfaith dialogue or conversations with the non-religious?
As I said, it appears you are blinded and certainly don’t understand the Gospel that Christians proclaim. There are spirits (as per my signature) but, at this point, you don’t believe there are.Certainly not to you.
Yes, it must comfort you to read a passage that
says you have The Truth, & others are blind.
Yet you don't see the light regarding Palestinians.
You defend war crimes, genocide, destruction,
& hatred of people for who they are.
Your God is a wicked delusion.
Your cult is the mind killer.