God is disproven by science? Really?

[MrIntelligentDesign]

Because no one, and this includes you, has been able to present any evidence for an intelligence.

You do not even understand what qualifies as evidence.

I had been giving you evidence that Evolution cannot answer this simple question:

is biological cell intelligently designed or not?

You see, either you answer that or accept my explanation...

Shall I repost again the definition of intelligence that I discovered? You must accept it or fight it.
Either I am wrong or you are.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I had been giving you evidence that Evolution cannot answer this simple question:

is biological cell intelligently designed or not?

You see, either you answer that or accept my explanation...

Shall I repost again the definition of intelligence that I discovered? You must accept it or fight it.
Either I am wrong or you are.

No you haven't. I posted a definition and a link that explained what qualifies as scientific evidence. Have you forgotten that already? You could not meet the qualifications.

 

[MrIntelligentDesign]

Sorry, but you appear to be the religious fanatic here.

Why do you accuse others of your sins? You better hope that the atheists are right.

WHAT?? I followed the norm of peer-review. The reviewers and journals did not follow. Whose fault?? Them, not me..

They are religious freaks, for not knowing real science and real intelligence.

 

[Subduction Zone]

WHAT?? I followed the norm of peer-review. The reviewers and journals did not follow. Whose fault?? Them, not me..

They are religious freaks, for not knowing real science and real intelligence.

No. You didn't.

 

[Spirit of Light]

When Galileo said that the Earth revolved around the Sun, he was house imprisoned. Was it his fault? No!

Our science in our generation is ruled by religious fanatics, who thought themselves scientists.

I will wait my time.

Actually i found you on youtube, honestly the comment from people and by listening to your speach.....does not seem like ENYONE agree with you.

I am no scientist, but when nobody understand you or can find faults that much in your work.....

 

[MrIntelligentDesign]

No you haven't. I posted a definition and a link that explained what qualifies as scientific evidence. Have you forgotten that already? You could not meet the qualifications.

If you discovered or rediscovered intelligence, I will follow you. But, you have no clue on that topic.

What are you talking about? Your evidences and basis had come from Evolution, thus, totally wrong.
You are totally wrong in everything in science IF YOU follow and accept Evolution.

 

[Spirit of Light]

WHAT?? I followed the norm of peer-review. The reviewers and journals did not follow. Whose fault?? Them, not me..

They are religious freaks, for not knowing real science and real intelligence.

If they are real scientists they dont mix religion and science (except for finding similarities in their scientific discovery and religious scriptures)

 

[Subduction Zone]

If you discovered or rediscovered intelligence, I will follow you. But, you have no clue on that topic.

What are you talking about? Your evidences and basis had come from Evolution, thus, totally wrong.
You are totally wrong in everything in science IF YOU follow and accept Evolution.

You can't show that you discovered anything.


And my evidence is based upon the scientific standard for all evidence. You can't even come close to that standard.

 

[MrIntelligentDesign]

Actually i found you on youtube, honestly the comment from people and by listening to your speach.....does not seem like ENYONE agree with you.

I am no scientist, but when nobody understand you or can find faults that much in your work.....

You cannot agree if you do not know the topic. My basis is: I discovered intelligence. Why? Intelligence was covered by Evolution. So?
When you used intelligence in Biology, you could easily falsify and replace Evolution. That is my claim. That is why I wrote science books, I summitted articles in science journals, etc..

BUT, they will never give that honor to me, probably, of professional envy! Yes! They will never falsify Evolution since Evolution messed reality! Evolution messed intelligence.

 

[Spirit of Light]

You can't show that you discovered anything.


And my evidence is based upon the scientific standard for all evidence. You can't even come close to that standard.

He reminds me of questfortruth

 

[MrIntelligentDesign]

If they are real scientists they dont mix religion and science (except for finding similarities in their scientific discovery and religious scriptures)

That is the ideal, but they are mixing now religion and science. For example, nothing can produce something? ARE YOU CRAZY??? Are you for real?? HOW COME?? Laurence Krauss... stupid.

 

[F1fan]

What do you mean by factual basis? Did I already tell you that Evolution cannot answer this simple question: is biological cell intelligently designed or not? There is no actual basis or any facts from Evolution, if that simple question is left unanswered.

If you are going to propose that cells are intelligently designed then what is intelligent in the design of cancer cells, especially those in children?

 

[Subduction Zone]

He reminds me of questfortruth

There is a debate between him and Aron Ra. It is a classic.

 

[Spirit of Light]

You cannot agree if you do not know the topic. My basis is: I discovered intelligence. Why? Intelligence was covered by Evolution. So?
When you used intelligence in Biology, you could easily falsify and replace Evolution. That is my claim. That is why I wrote science books, I summitted articles in science journals, etc..

BUT, they will never give that honor to me, probably, of professional envy! Yes! They will never falsify Evolution since Evolution messed reality! Evolution messed intelligence.

Are the intelligence you speak of called God in religion? If so you did not discover God

 

[Subduction Zone]

That is the ideal, but they are mixing now religion and science. For example, nothing can produce something? AR YOU CRAZY??? HOW COME?? Laurence Krauss... stupid.

Casimir effect.

 

[MrIntelligentDesign]

You can't show that you discovered anything.


And my evidence is based upon the scientific standard for all evidence. You can't even come close to that standard.

If you do not know intelligence, you are nothing valuable in science. Since, you are just following an erroneous Evolution.. Erroneous Evolution had messed intelligence.. oh my...

WHAT is intelligence?? Answer me..

Is the universe intelligently designed or not?

Oh, come on, evolution has no gut to answer that...

 

[Subduction Zone]

If you do not know intelligence, you are nothing valuable in science. Since, you are just following an erroneous Evolution.. Erroneous Evolution had messed intelligence.. oh my...

WHAT is intelligence?? Answer me..

Is the universe intelligently designed or not?

Oh, come on, evolution has no gut to answer that...

You can't even define your terms. As a result the answer has to be "No" at least until you do so.

 

[MrIntelligentDesign]

Are the intelligence you speak of called God in religion? If so you did not discover God

In science, we must have a very simple question for curiosity. How can you tell if a worker is smart or not, for promotion? Then, apply that in Biology and in science, you will end up rediscovering intelligence. And end up falsifying and replacing Evolution. It is so simple, right?

Start from a question. Then, you will see how God used intelligence in the creation.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Epic debate with our OP:

 

[Subduction Zone]

In science, we must have a very simple question for curiosity. How can you tell if a worker is smart or not, for promotion? Then, apply that in Biology and in science, you will end up rediscovering intelligence. And end up falsifying and replacing Evolution. It is so simple, right?

Start from a question. Then, you will see how God used intelligence in the creation.

Perhaps it is a problem with speaking English on your part, but that made no sense at all.