God is disproven by science? Really?

[Dan From Smithville]

If you have best discovery in science, how come nobody heard or seen you in world wide news or science programs?
You should be invited to take part all over the world to explain your discocery.

If you look you will see an emerging pattern regarding overwhelming loss in debates and rejection by peer review for those making absurd or baseless claims. It isn't the absurdity of there position that is at fault. It is a conspiracy against them personally.

 

[Spirit of Light]

In science, we must have a very simple question for curiosity. How can you tell if a worker is smart or not, for promotion? Then, apply that in Biology and in science, you will end up rediscovering intelligence. And end up falsifying and replacing Evolution. It is so simple, right?

Start from a question. Then, you will see how God used intelligence in the creation.

I am a believer in God my self.
But science have not yet discovered by solid proof that "God" actually exist, that is why religion is a belief system and not science
If you basing your science on a belief that "God" or intelligence as you call it exists, you will have difficulty proving to other real scientists that your research is true, because you would lack evidence.

 

[F1fan]

I just want to know what is intelligent about the design of cancer cells, especially in children. Apparently MrIntelligentDesign is totally stumped by my question.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I am a believer in God my self.
But science have not yet discovered by solid proof that "God" actually exist, that is why religion is a belief system and not science
If you basing your science on a belief that "God" or intelligence as you call it exists, you will have difficulty proving to other real scientists that your research is true, because you would lack evidence.

Some believers take it personally when their own "God" is proven not to exist. An extreme example is that of some Flat Earthers. They claim that a spherical Earth is an atheistic idea. They use "atheist" as a general pejorative.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Epic debate with our OP:

I remember that one. Aron Ra did a good job and easily won that debate.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I remember that one. Aron Ra did a good job and easily won that debate.

Even our OP admitted that on this thread.

 

[John53]

Even our OP admitted that on this thread.

Wait! What? You take that back! Mr ID has never lost a debate, he has told me so many times.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Even our OP admitted that on this thread.

Really? I am surprised. I thought the first rule of Pseudoscience Club was not to talk about the losses of Pseudoscience Club?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

No you haven't. I posted a definition and a link that explained what qualifies as scientific evidence. Have you forgotten that already? You could not meet the qualifications.

I fail to understand how the greatest mind in all science thinks that the theory of evolution

WHAT?? I followed the norm of peer-review. The reviewers and journals did not follow. Whose fault?? Them, not me..

They are religious freaks, for not knowing real science and real intelligence.

Or they recognized pseudoscientific nonsense when they were presented with it.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

In science, we must have a very simple question for curiosity. How can you tell if a worker is smart or not, for promotion? Then, apply that in Biology and in science, you will end up rediscovering intelligence. And end up falsifying and replacing Evolution. It is so simple, right?

Start from a question. Then, you will see how God used intelligence in the creation.

This isn't even pseudoscience. It is just plain nonsense.

 

[Sgt. Pepper]

Even our OP admitted that on this thread.

That's odd because he said that no one had ever beaten him in a debate (post # 562).

He reminds me of questfortruth

I was thinking the same thing.

 

[Sgt. Pepper]

Some believers take it personally when their own "God" is proven not to exist. An extreme example is that of some Flat Earthers. They claim that a spherical Earth is an atheistic idea. They use "atheist" as a general pejorative.

I don't know if this is a common belief among Flat Earthers and Young Creationist evangelicals, but I've heard some of them claim that dinosaurs never existed and all the dinosaur "fossils" were planted by demons to confuse humanity and cause people to doubt God's existence and doubt the Bible's account of the 6-day creation. I've also heard others claim that dinosaurs and man co-existed and that dinosaurs were created when God created the other animals. Doesn't Creationist Ken Ham claim that dinosaurs were on Noah's Ark?

 

[Watchmen]

Which religion _______________
Already in Genesis chapter 11, MEN created gods (man-made religion) for self-serving purposes or possibilities.
So, 'men's religions' gives them whatever rationale they want, thus we see many similar or overlapping religious ideas spread throughout today's religious world. From ancient Babylon to now a world-wide Babylon the Great.
Babylonian man-made religious ideas and practices with its rationale outside of Scripture but often taught as being Scripture so that the focus is placed on the 'desire of the heart' away from the Creator (Revelation 4:11).
So, going after 'whatever rationale one needs' does Not make what 'religious truth' is for.
Often not accepted, but Jesus taught that God's Word (Scripture) is religious truth - John 17:17
I'll stick with the rationale that Jesus taught which gives us the rationale, the reasons that God wants us to have.

I should have been clearer. ALL religion is false, but if believing in it makes you feel better than go for it (as long as you’re not hurting others).

 

[Watchmen]

I will believe you if you rediscover intelligence better than mine. If not, you are too ignorant of reality.

I know what intelligence is. In fact, there are many different kinds of intelligence.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I don't know if this is a common belief among Flat Earthers and Young Creationist evangelicals, but I've heard some of them claim that dinosaurs never existed and all the dinosaur "fossils" were planted by demons to confuse humanity and cause people to doubt God's existence and doubt the Bible's account of the 6-day creation. I've also heard others claim that dinosaurs and man co-existed and that dinosaurs were created when God created the other animals. Doesn't Creationist Ken Ham claim that dinosaurs were on Noah's Ark?

Yes, I know about the deniers of dinosaurs. That is too much for even Ken Ham. And due to the wording of Genesis Ken has to claim that there were dinosaurs on the ark since there were supposedly at least two of every "kind". It would go against the narrative for them to be left behind. But for some reason they went extinct after the flood.

Did you see the Bill Nye- Ken Ham debate?

 

[Sgt. Pepper]

Yes, I know about the deniers of dinosaurs. That is too much for even Ken Ham. And due to the wording of Genesis Ken has to claim that there were dinosaurs on the ark since there were supposedly at least two of every "kind". It would go against the narrative for them to be left behind. But for some reason they went extinct after the flood.

Did you see the Bill Nye- Ken Ham debate?

No, I haven't seen it.

 

[Subduction Zone]

No, I haven't seen it.

This is two and a half hours long, but there is one clear point where Ken lost the debate.

 

[John53]

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Do you want me to spoon-fed you?

I want you to follow the same track as any other idea in science.

Meaning: you formulate a testable and falsifiable hypothesis and support that hypothesis with data.
You lay out the testable predictions it makes and acknowledge the difficulties and assumptions required.

You write up a proper paper and send it in for subsequent review and publication (if it passes review).

You haven't done ANY of these things.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

What do you mean by factual basis? Did I already tell you that Evolution cannot answer this simple question: is biological cell intelligently designed or not? There is no actual basis or any facts from Evolution, if that simple question is left unanswered.

You are very confused because you had already thought that I am wrong in my definition of intelligence. EMPTY your self first with wrong definitions, and absorb mine, and you will see that I am right.

The answer to your silly question is "no".