I'm guessing we will never read a reasonable, fact-based response as to why you would disagree.I disagree
Are you simply agreeing with all that nonsense because it is ideologically expedient?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'm guessing we will never read a reasonable, fact-based response as to why you would disagree.I disagree
You should be sorry. Your opinion is just that. Opinion based on nothingSorry, that is an argument from ignorance. A logical fallacy.
Do you know anything about biochemistry?How? Where? Why?
The fact remains that there is only opinion when it comes down to it.Feelings are unreliable.
Not within science itself, so I suggest your feelings are misguiding your thinking.
Saying "coincidence" suggests there is some other assumed scenario, and that might be a problem for those fixated on a specific scenario, like one that theists might assume is true and valid. When facts challenge these beliefs there can be a problem for the theist accepting fact over faith.
Your statement here contradicts itself. If there are no facts (because there is only opinion) then how is this a fact? Since even you refer to at least one fact existing, there is at least one thing that isn't just opinion. So your opinion above is in error.The fact remains that there is only opinion when it comes down to it.
Irony at work here.You should be sorry. Your opinion is just that. Opinion based on nothing
Well where does the tadpole rate with the human being in the womb? More complex or less?No, a tadpole is as complex as you are. This again confirms about a fifth grade level of science education at best. Tadpoles, like you and I have over a three billion year history of evolution.
I haven’t seen a reasonable answer from any of you on here all you say is you know so much and have facts but don’t see any facts that support the fantasy of abiogenesis. Any experiment you try only supports intelligent design as soon as the human being (scientist) is introduced into the equation of any experiment.I'm guessing we will never read a reasonable, fact-based response as to why you would disagree.
Are you simply agreeing with all that nonsense because it is ideologically expedient?
Good responseIrony at work here.
Nope. My opinions aer based upon scientific evidence. It appears that yours are based upon a book of myths.You should be sorry. Your opinion is just that. Opinion based on nothing
Good responseIrony at work here.
And so narrow minded as to believe science can answer anythingNope. My opinions aer based upon scientific evidence. It appears that yours are based upon a book of myths.
Why do you oppose reality?
I need to remind you that you are the one that refuses to learn here. There is no reason that you could not learn. You do not appear to have any learning disabilities. The only thing that is keeping your from learning appears to be your fear. Which unfortunately tells us that you believe your faith to be rather weak.I haven’t seen a reasonable answer from any of you on here all you say is you know so much and have facts but don’t see any facts that support the fantasy of abiogenesis. Any experiment you try only supports intelligent design as soon as the human being (scientist) is introduced into the equation of any experiment.
Science can answer all sorts of questions. It just seems like magic to the uneducated. For example the path of the Solar Eclipse across America was known more than a year in advance. The exact path it would take, the time, how wide the band of total eclipse would be. Science gives us the power to do that.And so narrow minded as to believe science can answer anything
This is the link: Play from 25:00You claimed to have a clip. Now that appears to be a false claim.. Here is why they had pity on you:
If you are talking about "complexity" they are going to be roughly equal. Perhaps you wanted a different term. Of course that does not help your earlier argument.Well where does the tadpole rate with the human being in the womb? More complex or less?
I have been listening for almost 5 minutes. He was laughing at you earlier, is that what you are talking about?This is the link: Play from 25:00
Science answers scientific questions and not all questions of life.Science can answer all sorts of questions. It just seems like magic to the uneducated. For example the path of the Solar Eclipse across America was known more than a year in advance. The exact path it would take, the time, how wide the band of total eclipse would be. Science gives us the power to do that.
I haven't offered anything regarding abiogenesis.I haven’t seen a reasonable answer from any of you on here all you say is you know so much and have facts but don’t see any facts that support the fantasy of abiogenesis. Any experiment you try only supports intelligent design as soon as the human being (scientist) is introduced into the equation of any experiment.
Actually I am not religious at all. Probably I should say Creator. So my beliefs are based on something different. What are your disbeliefs based on ?Nope. My opinions aer based upon scientific evidence. It appears that yours are based upon a book of myths.
Why do you oppose reality?