God is strange or are we the weirdos.

[Link]

Analogy:

Lovely Lady: You want to go on a date?

Skeptic: Yes, but you got to prove you are real!

Lovely Lady: What, I'm right in front of you, you see me don't you?

Skeptic: It can be that you are robot programmed as a human designed to trick me from Aliens.

Lovely Lady: Bye Weird person.

Skeptic: Aha, I knew it, she was a robot. Nice try Aliens!

 

[Pete in Panama]

the question for me is do I post a warning to everyone here that this thread has been started by the forum's new AI bot...

 

[The Hammer]

Typical logic when someone tries to "prove" a singular god.

Glad you can see the religious hypocrisy.

 

[F1fan]

It's weird to think Gods exist.

 

[F1fan]

Analogy:

Lovely Lady: You want to go on a date?

Skeptic: Yes, but you got to prove you are real!

If he's a skeptic who is he talking to? That he in engaging acknowledges that she's real.

Lovely Lady: What, I'm right in front of you, you see me don't you?

Skeptic: It can be that you are robot programmed as a human designed to trick me from Aliens.

Now it makes sense (no it doesn't).

Lovely Lady: Bye Weird person.

Skeptic: Aha, I knew it, she was a robot. Nice try Aliens!

@Link did this happen to you?

 

[Link]

@Link did this happen to you?

Story of my life <3.

 

[sun rise]

This thread reminded me of a song I quite liked in my youth

 

[LuisDantas]

As @F1fan points out, the dialogue is weird and does not match the thread title.

 

[dybmh]

Yes, I think skepticism can definitely go too far. At a certain point it starts to become arrogant.

1. Nothing can be proven outside the mind
2. The only thing that can be proven is inside the mind
3. If it's outside of my mind it cannot be proven
4. If you don't agree with what's in my mind you're automatically wrong
5. My mind is all that matters
6. I am all that exists

 

[Link]

As @F1fan points out, the dialogue is weird and does not match the thread title.

Relax, it's just food for thought.

 

[dybmh]

As @F1fan points out, the dialogue is weird and does not match the thread title.

If it is incomprehensible TO YOU then you do not need to participate.

 

[Link]

Story of my life <3.

Should Have Never Doubted

You who show up in overwhelming glory and beauty
My legs shivered and I fell in love
I should have never doubted your reality
I sought proofs as if to put your hand in a glove

Proofs philosophically I sought
When all you wanted is for me abandon my caprice
So that your love and vision be bought
But alas I moved away from your matrass

That use to fly me up to you
Down to the illusions
Darkness of deeds made me untrue
Till I awakened from my delusions

You who is in the clear horizon
I seek your forgiveness and mercy
So don't roast me in your oven
And bring me to the highest potential me

 

[The Hammer]

It's weird to think Gods exist.

It's weird to think they can be proven. Not that they exist.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

Analogy:

Lovely Lady: You want to go on a date?

Skeptic: Yes, but you got to prove you are real!

Lovely Lady: What, I'm right in front of you, you see me don't you?

Skeptic: It can be that you are robot programmed as a human designed to trick me from Aliens.

Lovely Lady: Bye Weird person.

Skeptic: Aha, I knew it, she was a robot. Nice try Aliens!

Let me just ask a very simple question: when was the last time that somebody spoke to you, and you first had to decide if that person was "real" or not?

 

[Link]

Let me just ask a very simple question: when was the last time that somebody spoke to you, and you first had to decide if that person was "real" or not?

Exactly, why pick on God than?

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

Exactly, why pick on God than?

Because I've never met him. When I do, I may well take a different position.

 

[dybmh]

Let me just ask a very simple question: when was the last time that somebody spoke to you, and you first had to decide if that person was "real" or not?

Believe it or not, this is kinda trendy in certain groups. Nothing has inherent reality. All perception is completely false. Not incomplete, but nothing about it is true. And then they try to prove it using real world examples... from reality. It's literally self-defeating.

None the less, it means something simple like players on a baseball team are questionable. Are they real? Is this the matrix?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Analogy:

Lovely Lady: You want to go on a date?

Skeptic: Yes, but you got to prove you are real!

Lovely Lady: What, I'm right in front of you, you see me don't you?

Skeptic: It can be that you are robot programmed as a human designed to trick me from Aliens.

Lovely Lady: Bye Weird person.

Skeptic: Aha, I knew it, she was a robot. Nice try Aliens!

How is this supposed to be analogous?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Yes, I think skepticism can definitely go too far. At a certain point it starts to become arrogant.

1. Nothing can be proven outside the mind
2. The only thing that can be proven is inside the mind
3. If it's outside of my mind it cannot be proven
4. If you don't agree with what's in my mind you're automatically wrong
5. My mind is all that matters
6. I am all that exists

Is that supposed to be a description of your average sceptic?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Relax, it's just food for thought.

Is it?

It rather sounds like some bizarre false equivocation fallacy